2017 Jaguar F-Type SVR Convertible first drive review: more growl than bite Page 2

Attacking the track

I'm not a member here, but the good folks at Autobahn are letting me head out with the Group C cars, which are performance-oriented street cars. For this session, it's just me and one other guy in a hot Porsche 911. That's good because if I spin this thing I don't want to get hit.

Turns out my worries are unfounded. Yes, this car is a bit twitchy. It's reactions are indeed sudden. But given the space of a racetrack, it settles into predictability.

After that initial twitch, which sees the rear end kick out a bit in the opposite direction of the turn, the car settles down. It squats in the rear, with a bit of a nose-up attitude. It's actually quite forgiving at this point, as getting the car through carousel-type turns is a dance of feeding in bits of brake and throttle. Jumping on it hard too early when exiting a turn could send the rear end out too far, but I'm surprised how controllable it is near the limit. It's a bit sloppy. This is no scalpel like a Porsche 911. But it's fun.

ALSO SEE: 2017 Porsche 911 Carrera 4 GTS: Living with a street and track star

Unfortunately, that fun, and the brakes, don't last too long. This car is outfitted with the base brakes, which feature rather pedestrian 15-inch front rotors with dual-piston calipers and 14.8-inch rear rotors with single-piston calipers. On my fourth lap, the pedal starts to get spongy and sink deeper to the floor. The binders are still there; I just really have to rail on the pedal to get the car to slow down.

After 10 minutes, though, I get a warning on the instrument panel that the brakes have overheated. That's it. I stay out for five more laps at touring speeds to run air over the brakes to see if that will bring them back. It doesn't work. Apparently, I've overheated the brake fluid, and the Jaguar is done for the day. Maybe some higher grade brake fluid would help, but the brakes just aren't substantial enough for a car like this.

DON'T MISS: 2018 Audi RS 5 first drive review: green with mean

You would think a 575-horsepower, $132,000 sports car would be able to handle more punishment. You can bet a Porsche 911 would be able to deal with it. The option? Spend $9,900 for the carbon ceramic brakes, which have 6-piston front and 4-piston rear calipers, as well as larger rotors. More surface area on both the rotors and calipers, plus the carbon ceramic compound, means those brakes should be able to dissipate heat better.

Street machine

For as disappointing as the Jaguar is on the track, it's a ball on the street. The engine note is pure joy, and Jaguar provides an exhaust button on the center console that opens up more baffles to make it louder. After a few miles behind the wheel, I learn to go smoother on the steering and throttle, and that takes care of the twitchiness. The ride is actually livable, even on Chicago's minefield of potholes.

Top-down driving is a ball, as always, especially as the beautiful Midwestern days wind down, and the structure of this car allows no cowl shake. Perhaps this car's greatest strength is it's look. Sinister and beautiful at the same time, like Queen Cersei, this beast gets noticed. It's obvious that rear wing wasn't planned for from the beginning, though, as it obscures the Jaguar badge underneath.

I see two main issues, though. Those brakes are an embarrassment at this price. The F-Type SVR puts up near supercar numbers, but it's stopped by brakes you'd expect on a V-6 Camaro. The other main issue is the very existence of the Porsche 911. Yes, this is a better looking car, but it can't perform like the car it wants to challenge. It can't handle the rigors of the track, and its twitchy street character and somewhat sloppy track handling wouldn't be accepted in Stuttgart.

I'm glad that I can handle it, but Jaguar still has some work to do.

Follow Us

Take Us With You!


Related Used Listings

Browse used listings in your area.

© 2017 MotorAuthority. All Rights Reserved. MotorAuthority is published by Internet Brands Automotive Group. Stock photography by izmostock. Read our Cookie Policy.