That's meant both figuratively and literally.
Starting out like a wildfire, the beauty of the Karma in concept form, as well as the Sunset and Surf concepts that followed it, spread the Fisker name far and wide--far wider than founder Henrik Fisker's work designing cars for other automakers over the course of his career.
Government-sourced accelerant in the form of Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing (ATVM) loans splashed the company back across the headlines in 2009, but an attempt to throw gasoline on the fire with an IPO in 2010 (a subject that arose again in 2012) in an effort to raise funds for further development of its planned range of cars fizzled.
Fisker's Karma, the only car it actually managed to build despite plans for a six-car lineup, is no stranger to fire. In fact, three Karma fires made national news over its brief lifespan.
The second saw a Karma in California burn to the ground at the roadside due to a faulty cooling fan. Fisker issued a voluntary recall to fix the defect shortly after.
Where the fault may lay for any of these fires, the theme has proved apt for the company as a whole.
Screen capture from video by Aaron Wood of fire in 2012 Fisker Karma in Wooside, CA, August 2012Enlarge Photo
Today's announcement, in context, is the final flameout, leaving only the dying embers of what was once Fisker Automotive to hire lawyers and prepare for a possible bankruptcy.
For a comprehensive, in-depth look at the rise and fall of Fisker Automotive, read The Car Connection's Fisker: An Influential Disaster and Green Car Reports' Fisker Lays Off Most Of Its Employees; Is This The Final Blow?
The Karma Conundrum
But enough about the brand's tendency toward inflammatory events. What of the Karma and other planned cars?
We've been fortunate enough to spend time in the Karma, and several of our staff have driven the car. It's actually not a bad car.
It's just not a very good car, or more specifically, it's not a very good range-extended electric car (or series hybrid). In fact, it's the least-efficient electric car sold.
Yes, it's beautiful, and yes, it's fairly quick, but it's miserably inefficient. In fact, it's no more efficient than many conventional V-8-powered cars of similar performance, and less efficient than some.
Powered by two electric motors drawing from a 20.1-kWh lithium-ion battery pack, as well as a GM-sourced 2.0-liter four-cylinder turbocharged Ecotec engine as on-board range extender, for a total of 408 horsepower, the Karma seemingly had the right ingredients to be a successful, efficient advanced powertrain vehicle.
That is, until you take into account the rest of the ingredient list: a corpulent 5,300-pound curb weight, a 124.4-inch wheelbase, 78.1-inches in width, and a $102,000-$116,000 price tag.
It has also been, from day one through the most recent examples we've seen, only one small step away from a kit car. Fit and finish vary widely, not just car-to-car, but from one portion of a car to the next.
Fisker, like Tesla Motors continues to do, constantly over-promised on its product. Unlike Tesla, however, Fisker consistently under-delivered. In most cases, in fact, Fisker has yet to deliver at all.
Those cases include the Sunset, the two-door convertible version of the Karma, and the Surf, the shooting break-style version. Both cars were shown at auto shows and promised for production-form unveilings by late 2012, but neither materialized.
Fisker Atlantic Design Prototype - 2012 New York Auto ShowEnlarge Photo
Now sounding what may be its death knell, we have to wonder where, exactly, Fisker's more than $1 billion in private funding and $192 million in U.S. government loans have gone.
Up in smoke?