
2005 Lexus LF-A Concept
A decade of development
To measure that, we have to look at what Lexus put into the LFA. Development began in early 2000, with three years of research and testing before the first prototype was built in mid-2003. Another two years of study elapsed before the first concept car appeared in January 2005, at the Detroit Auto Show. Even then, it was clearly a concept; side-mirrors were replaced by cameras, a heavy and impractical (in super/sports car terms) glass roof was fitted.
Despite rumors of its production-intent status, the car stagnated. Over the next two years, it underwent a radical redesign, switching from a more conventional aluminum frame to a carbon fiber basis due to growing weight concerns. The first of the redesigned LFA concept cars showed in January 2007, again in Detroit. At the same show, the Lexus IS-F debuted, the first--and thus far, only--example of Lexus' long-rumored F Performance line. If the goal were simply to bathe the IS-F in the light of the LFA's technical excellence, the job could have been considered complete at that point--the proof of concept showed Lexus had the technical and design capability.
But it wasn't to end there: over the course of 2007, the powertrain became the subject of vacillation and change. The 2005 concept was touted as generating "more than 500 horsepower" from an engine displacing "less than five liters," though exactly what form that engine would take--V-8, V-10, something else--was not revealed. The 2007 concept brought with it the promise of a V-10 layout. But between the 2007 concept and the 2008 Roadster concept, there were indications that Lexus was considering a possible V-8 engine paired with a hybrid drivetrain not unlike the LS600h L's. Yet another sinkhole for R&D dollars, and one that ultimately bore no fruit.
Returning again to Detroit, in 2008, the LF-A Roadster concept was unveiled, cementing the role of the V-10 engine, but this time showing it without the top. Lexus intended it, along with the dramatically restyled exterior details, to demonstrate the realm of possibilities enabled by the LFA's new-found carbon fiber construction. Though it isn't clear that the Roadster was ever intended for series production, it was this model that debuted many of the production-oriented design features of the car. One has to wonder how much time and effort was sunk into making it a suitable stiff, competent supercar in drop-top form.
Move forward another year to 2009 and the industry, fully in the midst of freefall, and still Lexus marched forward at its achingly slow pace with the LFA. In October, the production model was finally revealed at the Tokyo Motor Show. The order books opened two days after its debut, but even then, it would be another 14 months before the LFA finally entered production.
Have an opinion?
Enzo Posted: 5/24/2011 4:59pm PDT
beelzebub Posted: 5/24/2011 5:22pm PDT
Silent Bob Posted: 5/24/2011 5:39pm PDT
At least they built the damn thing when Acura canned the NSX and Infiniti only teased with the Essence and BMW doesn't even compete. You forget to really touch what was learned with the car and how this will trickle down to other cars. It did with the 2011 IS F as the LFA team tuned it and the car is 8 seconds faster than the 2008 model.
Lets be honest. no Japanese brand had a 100k car until the LS 600h L and now here is Lexus trying to sell one for 375k in a market that is slow? Its amazing they continued to go ahead with the project. I haven't seen another other supercar showcased and put into the hands of people as Lexus has done, that should be commended.
Countach Posted: 5/24/2011 7:19pm PDT
Damien Thomas Posted: 5/24/2011 11:14pm PDT
Back in the U.S., an IS F wouldn't get a second glance from me.
Lexus already has strong sales in the U.S. I think the purpose of the car is really to get Europe's attention. People with tons of money want to be different, want to stand out. I now finally understand why Lexus made this car so expensive. I was once a hater but now am converted. I would rather own this than a 599 or any Aston Martin if I was looking to buy a mega expensive GT.
QB Posted: 5/25/2011 6:31am PDT
I also acknowledge several times that the LFA, even if not a world-beater, is a very impressive car. I don't hate it by any means.
z2Cents Posted: 5/25/2011 9:01am PDT
The Author is rather myopic in his analysis of the LFA program focusing primarily on the monetary cost\benefit with indifference to the rest. This is a good article to read and understand the other side of the argument and is irrelevant to the value of the LFA program, either to Lexus or its customers.
It does however help expose fanbois such as Countach empowered by internet access and a few throw away comparisons.
Car Nut Posted: 5/26/2011 11:01am PDT
Eric Chang Posted: 5/26/2011 12:06pm PDT
Dave Posted: 5/26/2011 6:05pm PDT
chaplinmoore Posted: 5/26/2011 7:50pm PDT
How the hell can it be a sales dud ?
Mike Posted: 5/27/2011 9:58am PDT
Rebuttal
Austin Healey Posted: 5/30/2011 11:43pm PDT
There is a lot more to the LFA than the materials in in or the performance figures. Almost all the real car reviewers praised its handling and track manners. The TG power lap times speaks the undeniable truth.
There are plenty of alternatives, GTR, Corvette, ferrari, lamborghini, koeniggsegg, Pagani etc at all price ranges. None will be as exclusive or refined and built by the best automaker in the world.
True car enthusiasts will want to collect the LFA. Sunday drivers prefer the flashy brands like Ferrari.
Roger Posted: 6/1/2011 3:20am PDT
Lexus owner Posted: 6/3/2011 1:17pm PDT
DanCaek Posted: 6/6/2011 8:00am PDT
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!