Lexus Planning Recall Of 2010 HS 250h For Potential Post-Crash Fuel Leak

 
Follow Nelson

2010 Lexus HS 250h

Gasoline. Even for hybrids, it's the nectar of life. But in a crash, it can become your worst enemy--which is why the Department of Transportation has standards for how much fuel can leak from a car following an accident. In Lexus' latest round of safety-related recalls, the 2010 HS 250h is being called in for repair for failing fuel leak tests.

The problem arises when the car is rotated 90 degrees or more around its longitudinal axis. In human speak, that means when the car rolls over. In testing, the car leaked more than the acceptable amount of fuel as required by Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 301, which regulates post-crash fuel system integrity. Specifically, sections 5.6 and 6.2, which relate to rollover and rear-impact spillage prevention.

Section 5.6 limits fuel spillage in a rollover test to a total of 142 grams of fuel in the first 5 minutes for each successive 90-degree increment, and 28 grams per minute for the remainder of the test. To put that in meaningful terms, a standard gallon of gasoline weighs about six pounds, so a leak of 142 grams would equate to about 6.7 ounces of fuel. The subsequent 28 grams per minute leakage rate equates to roughly 1.3 ounces per minute. That's not much fuel, but anyone who's seen gasoline burn in open air knows it doesn't take much to make a lot of fire.

Section 6.2 deals with leakage following a 50 mph (80 km/h) rear-impact crash test. The allowed spillage is limited to the same quantity as the rollover test, and includes a 25-minute period post-impact for evaluation of the 28 grams/minute leakage.

Lexus has already announced it intends to perform a voluntary recall of the affected cars, though it also says in a press release, "Our engineers conducted similar testing during the development of the new HS 250h and the vehicle performed safely."

It looks like it may be a while before a fix is found, too. In another press release, Lexus stated, "At the present time, Lexus has not identified a remedy to address this issue, but it is working hard to do so promptly and will notify owners as soon as one is developed.  Until then, as required by federal law, dealers will not deliver any new vehicles in their inventory that are covered by this NCIR until remedied. "

The question we put to you is whether you'd consider buying a Lexus at all given the past year's track record with safety-related defects and recalls. Is the Toyota/Lexus name still enough to justify the purchase, or is it just too big a risk to take with the safety of you and for family at stake? Let us know in the comments below.

[NHTSA, Lexus]





 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (5)
  1. If all these safety recalls continue, Toyota and its brands will be down for the count. While you could accept such a recall on a Prius, it is unacceptable to do so on a similar hybrid vehicle at this price point. Shame on Toyota for stating that it doesn't have a fix yet. The fix should be to give a customer a new vehicle!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. I think you must be being deliberately inflammatory (pun intended). They can't give customers a new vehicle because they haven't got a fix yet. They haven't got a fix yet because when they did the tests, they didn't spot this problem. I'm confident they'll come up with a quick fix, issue a recall, and be done with it.

    However, I do agree that they won't be able to do this too many times. Audi had sluggish sales for years after their cruise control problems and Jaguar is still paying for its low quality in the early 1990s.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. Would we consider buying a Lexus considering the recalls?
    We already have a Lexus HS 250h, and learned about the impending recall late last week, after a previous recall to reprogram the brakes. Nevertheless, we bought a Lexus Rx 450h this week, even though we still are waiting for word on the decision on the HS 250h.
    I have full faith that Lexus will take care of the problem, whatever that requires. Our experiences with Lexus automobiles and the Lexus team continue to be outstanding.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. I'm a bit surprised such a question could be posed actually. We are all aware that Toyota are, as are indeed several other vehicle manufacturers, an exceptional engineering facility with an almost unmatched customer focus. (No, I don't work from them).
    However, as with all top manufacturers the odd point of what engineering failures that do come about are seen as larger than they are due to height of their own benchmarks.
    On top of this legislation is becoming ever more tricky to deal with, since each government wishes to baby the public far further that reality should allow, and it is again the engineers that have to step up to the mark.
    I couldn't possibly blame Toyota for the odd 'issue'. They are dealing with it. They show no reluctance or corner-cutting with the way they approach any issue and frankly their honour, skills and reputation should be well upheld. If the public do take an impact approach against them it will only result in the public making yet another foolish error of judgement through ignorance.
    I would certainly buy another Toyota vehicle.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. I think this would be better if some good are installed in your vehicle. In this way, things shall be good.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Connect with Facebook

Motor Authority. Now with your friends.

Discover stories your friends read.
Share stories more easily.
You control what you share.
Learn more

Research New Cars

Go!

 
© 2011 MotorAuthority. All Rights Reserved. MotorAuthority is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.