Confirmed: Porsche Panamera To Avoid Gas Guzzler Tax

 
Follow Nelson

2010 Porsche Panamera

A few weeks ago reports emerged that the 2010 Porsche Panamera would be just efficient enough to squeak by without incurring the gas guzzler tax penalty, a happy thought for potential owners. Today at a Panamera drive event, Porsche confirmed to High Gear Media that the car will indeed sidestep the tax.

It just barely clears the required mark, however, with a combined fuel economy rating of 23 mpg across the range for purposes of the tax. That's only 0.5 mpg above the floor for avoiding the tax.

How the 2010 Panamera managed to secure a 23 mpg combined average isn't clear, as the sportier S and 4S models score 16 mpg in the city and 24 mpg on the highway, hinting at a combined score closer to 20 mpg. The Turbo knocks another 1 mpg off each of those figures.

If combined efficiency of a passenger car dips anywhere below 22.5 mpg, the tax starts at $1,000 and quickly ramps up from there, hitting $3,000 below 17.5 mpg and maxing out at $7,700 for cars averaging less than 12.5 mpg.

The gas guzzler tax was formulated in the late 1970s and revised in 1991, but SUVs, pickups and commercial vehicles are still excluded from its scope, meaning only passenger cars are subject to the tax.





 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (8)
  1. "How the 2010 Panamera managed to secure a 23 mpg combined average isn't clear..."
    It's not brain surgery - the Engine Auto-Stop/Start feature which kills the engine when at standtill is what accomplishes those relatively low figures...
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. If that's the case, bepsf, then why aren't the city mpg figures higher? How can they influence one test and not the other? How does the combination of 16 and 23 end up being 23?
    It's not brain surgery. But it's not clear, either.
    Different testing standards are at work here, so there's something--quite possibly the stop-start feature, as you point out--influencing the different tests differently. But barring a full explanation from Porsche, we're not likely to know for sure. So I refrained from speculating.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. this also clearly shows that being more green need not mean downsizing engines. A somewhat calming thought for petrol heads.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. How many people who can afford this care actually worry about paying the gas guzzler tax?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. Yes, but it cannot avoid the ugly tax.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. Nelson--
    For greater Highway mileage, there's the very aerodynamic exterior with it's flat underbelly plus the the 7 speed DSG transmission - the gearing as well as its programming obviously affect highway fuel economy and emissions.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. Are any of you aware of how this test is conducted? Its done on a rolling road, tire pressure, fuel load, oil temp, you name it, and every parameter is set to its optimal setting for maximum fuel efficiency. The greatest parameter being there is no wind resistance as its done on a rolling road. Voila! you now have 23 mpg as a combined avg. This is what happens when politicians and lobbyists get to set up test standards!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  8. Porsche has announced ratings for the 2010 sedan; it will get a combined figure of 18 mpg or 19 mpg from the EPA, depending on the model.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Connect with Facebook

Motor Authority. Now with your friends.

Discover stories your friends read.
Share stories more easily.
You control what you share.
Learn more

Research New Cars

Go!

 
© 2011 MotorAuthority. All Rights Reserved. MotorAuthority is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.