Zero Pollution Motors plans 2011 U.S. launch for 106mpg air-powered car

 

zpm airpod 010

The ZPM AIRPod demonstrates the company's small form factor and compressed air technology

The ZPM AIRPod demonstrates the company's small form factor and compressed air technology

Enlarge Photo
While major auto manufacturers race to bring new electric and hybrid cars to market, other companies are looking at alternatives to electricity - including using air to power cars. The idea of an air-powered car is nothing new, and companies have been touting the technology for the past few years but for now not much has emerged in the way of a production model, largely due to flaws with the design of the vehicles.

In fact, many engineers are skeptical of the technology's use, as the energy required to power air-compressors in air-powered cars is massive compared to using that energy in an electric battery instead. But there are some distinct advantages to be found in the use of air-powered cars, namely their relative inexpensiveness when compared to complex hybrids and electric vehicles.

One such champion of this aspect of air-powered cars is the CEO of Zero Pollution Motors, a start-up that has developed its own compressed-air car that it hopes to bring to U.S shores by 2011. Heading up the company is Shiva Vencat, who says that while the "whole wide world" may criticize air-powered cars, at the end of the cars such as the Chevrolet Volt need a "massive lithium-ion battery" and hence the final cost to consumers skyrockets.

Conversely, Vencat claims that his compressed-air car will ultimately cost around $18,000 to $20,000 when it arrives in the U.S., or around $15,000 less than the upcoming Volt is expected to cost. This saving comes from not having to implement a complex electrical system in the car, and saving on battery costs.

Air-powered cars work by using an air compressor to pressurize air in the car’s tank. When the car is driven at low speeds, the air is released, pushing the pistons up and down as in a conventional gasoline engine without the need for gasoline to provide combustion. At higher speeds the ZPM uses a small conventional motor to heat up the air in order to release it more quickly, as well as to compress more air to extend the range of the car.

The problem with this, as pointed out by numerous experts, is that plugging an air-powered car into a wall to compress air is inherently less efficient than plugging an electric car into the wall instead. The Zero Pollutions Motor air-car uses around six times as much electricity to cover the same distance as the Chevrolet Volt - ultimately, which one appeals to consumers will depend on their own needs but its not impossible to think of certain segments that could find an air-powered car useful.

As for the stats behind Zero Pollution Motors' compressed-air car, they read as impressively as any current electric car - seating for six people, fuel economy of 106mpg and 75hp from its six-cylinder engine, as well as a driving range of close to 850 miles.



 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
Comments (19)
  1. They just couldn't make it good looking, that was to hard.... ho come on, where are those guys from? just make it look like a car, not like a rolling box
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. seems like a decent start, but what is the crash test results on this ugly little thing.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. It's like your own personal coffin, what colour to choose, what colour hhmmm...
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. Looks about as practical as gold-leaf toilet paper.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. BTW, what does this thing weigh? It looks like it would blow over when a Smart passes by.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. That may be one of the weirdest looking things I have ever see
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. Relative to EV's, the one advantage of compressed air, maybe refill times similar to that of filling a tank of gas.

    It does sort of look like a motorized covered wheel chair.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  8. They want to charge us twice the price of the Euro version. Darn government intervention.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  9. If FORD, GM, AND CHRYSLER would get these cars on the road NOW maybe they wouldn't NEED the "bailout" they are looking for from us taxpayers! What a country!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  10. I still think that the price of these cars needs to be quite a bit lower than 18000 for them to become a staple in the US. Just too expensive for such a light vehicle.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  11. Honestly I don't understand how that could be worth $18,000... besides the awesome bright colors crazy windows and weird seating it looks so CHEAP.. or maybe that's what makes it look so cheap haha 0_O
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  12. I think people are looking at these vehicle the wrong way. Instead of a car, I see this more like a motorcycle. It offers more protection from the elements, better gas mileage, and just about as much protection from other vehicles as a motorcycles. I ride a bike and I would love to have one of these things too.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  13. I agree with Barry #14! His is the most helpful conception about the design of the ZPM. Thanks, Barry, for thinking outside of the box of normal, usual car shapes.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  14. I'd like to build my own as a kit car - I just wonder what the engine would cost with the air compressor. I designed something like when I was 12 - of course I didn’t have any idea what I was doing. I thought it was possible but my parents where not supportive of trying. What I think I’d do is combine this engine with a cyclekarts racer's body and perhaps combined with petal powered for when you ran out of air. I like the basic idea.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  15. Shoot if gas prices continue to rise, I know I'm buying one. And even if I don't, others will, which will lower the demand of gas, which will drive down prices worldwide. People who don't switch should see some external benefits from this new entry.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  16. I hope the Japanese get in on this car. I think htey are our only hope for alternative power wether that be electricity or cars.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  17. When is it going to be sold in the US? Interested in the 5-6 passenger. Been following this company for 5 years and the cars are still not available to buy in the US yet!!!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  18. I love the fact that you can have compressed air setup making a vehicle run. What I do not want is the ugly looking vehicle. I will take their engine that will replace my engine, that can be powerfull enough to make 400 behind wheel horsepower to move my muscle car. I have a car, just need an engine.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  19. Ugly does not begin to describe this thing. As with all transportation solutions it is the net energy use from source to vehicle that matters. By using 6 X the electrical energy to compress air versus charge a battery this THING would need massive investment in electric generation, transmission, and distribution. Unless this generation is green the net effect will be even more pollution than we have now. Right now the US uses coal, the most polluting fuel on the planet. Well done air heads ! !
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Research New Cars

Go!


 
© 2011 MotorAuthority. All Rights Reserved. MotorAuthority is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.
 

Use the form below to send us a tip, give us feedback, or just say hello.

(max 750 characters)