Toyota could have hydrogen fuel-cell car on the road by 2014

 

The new date is a year earlier than scheduled due to changes in California's ZEV mandate

The new date is a year earlier than scheduled due to changes in California's ZEV mandate

Enlarge Photo
Honda's FCX Clarity fuel cell vehicle has grabbed lots of headlines, as has BMW's combustion-powered Hydrogen7 and Mazda's rotary RE line of vehicles, including the RX-8. But Toyota is working on a hydrogen fuel cell vehicle too, and it could be on the streets by 2014.

Well, the streets of California at least. The company had previously released plans to have a hydrogen fuel-cell vehicle on the road by 2015, but that schedule has been bumped up a year to meet the incentives within California's Zero Emissions Vehicle mandate.

“So much of what happens is directly related to the California ZEV mandates — they’re followed by at least 14 states, and they affect nearly half of the cars on the market in the United States. Phase IV of the mandates covers model years 2015 through 2017, so that means we could begin complying in late 2014," John Hanson, a Toyota spokesperson, told the New York Times.

California's ZEV scheme has previously influenced Toyota and other carmakers, including General Motors, to introduce zero-emissions vehicles, including the RAV-4 EV and the much-discussed EV-1.

This time around, the monetary benefits to California's program are such that it's now a valid business case for Toyota to build the hydrogen fuel-cell car.



 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
Comments (2)
  1. I think it would be stupid to put a car on nitrogen plus, not on a toyota they're already way to overpriced (like over $4,000). It would be one thing if you put a honda on nitrogen, or maybe a GM motor vehicle.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. I think a hydrogen vehicle is a great concept. However, the basic laws of physics do not. Here’s why, simply stated: when the energy input to get the H, high-pressure equipment for storage, transportation and safety costs are realistically factored in, $4 gas will seem like stealing from old ladies.
    The BTU output of hydrogen is tiny relative to almost anything else. If the Hindenburg had contained gasoline, or only its fumes, most of New Jersey probably would have been destroyed.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Research New Cars

Go!


 
© 2011 MotorAuthority. All Rights Reserved. MotorAuthority is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.
 

Use the form below to send us a tip, give us feedback, or just say hello.

(max 750 characters)