Obama approves $2.4 billion in electric vehicle funding

 

The grants come after a tour of the Southern California Edison EV Technical Center

The grants come after a tour of the Southern California Edison EV Technical Center

Enlarge Photo
Calling the U.S. federal government's expenditures under the end of President Bush's tenure and the beginning of President Obama's a 'spending spree' is to beggar the term understatement. But in many instances, there hasn't been a valid alternative aside from letting parts of the economy wither and die. The latest round of funding - $2.4 billion for electric vehicles - announced yesterday promises to help the U.S. reach Obama's goal of 1 million plug-in electrics on the road by 2015.

Electric vehicles have been around as long as the automobile, but due to the abundance of cheap and readily available petroleum-based fuels, they have never caught on for public use. Some corporations, such as energy giant Southern California Edison, have invested in the technology as a way to research and benefit from the technology in their fleet vehicles. But how well that will translate to trips to the local market or to the next state to visit family is still not clear.

Nevertheless, the President is forging ahead with the subsidy of the electric vehicle industry, focusing in large part on the nuts-and-bolts suppliers of things like battery technology and drivetrain components. Far from a bid at government-run laboratories, the funding is pitched as an incentive for entrepreneurial innovation.

"Show us that your idea or your company is best-suited to meet America's challenges, and we will give you a chance to prove it," said the President in a speech to the electric vehicle industry. "Every company that wants a shot at these tax dollars has to prove their worth."

Many in the industry are nevertheless concerned about the capacity to produce and deliver such high-tech parts for a reasonable, market-sustained price. Battery packs, charging systems and the infrastructure necessary to support them are all expensive, and even the $2.4 billion announced this week may not be enough.



 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
Comments (4)
  1. this is good news.

    regardless of what you think of electric vehicles (if they will become the new norm or just be a fire in a flash pan), this is a good chance to see just how well the technology will do if its given a chance to prosper.

    theres really no way to surge forward unless some one foots the development costs.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. I'm sure the technology is in fine hands and most likely in development terms falls under Moores law much like PC's. The one issue I do not see though is money on infrastructure. The grid in the U.S. is just not ready for all of us to go out and buy electric cars.

    I know what your thinking- MWOW this will happen over time and it will all be in place on time. Although some how I feel the speed at which the vehicles are coming is just supersonic in comparison to power plants coming on-line. This issue is of major concern here in the U.S. as there is not a single form of energy production everybody can agree. You've got cows with two heads and five legs, kids suffering from black lung disease because the local power plant burns coal and my personal favorite wind power now has opposition becauase apparently bald eagles fly into the blades when there spinning!!!!

    I just hope the shelf at the worlds electric vehicle tech/engineering centers is huge because thats where the technology is going to sit. That is until people can set aside their differences and realise we need to produce one form of energy so as to replace dependency of another.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. OMG!!! Obama treats a billions dollars like it's a penny. All that money is going to be paid for several generations! He is insane. All of that hard work going to lazy people who don't take advantage of living in the United States and live off welfare, and lots of unneccesary (investments).
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. @samuelesm - perhaps you meant to say "OMG!!! The PRESIDENT treats a billion dollars like it's a penny."
    IF you did, then you will listen to reason. It takes time and money to make money and most other things for that matter.
    Do you have a good job today? Do you earn a decent amount of money every week or 2 weeks? Perhaps you may have gone to college to earn a degree to secure employment. This process is called planning ahead. Now, how much did it cost you to get educated for 3-5 or more years, perhaps $50K to $70K?
    Well, the $2.4Bn that we are spending today has a two-fold purpose. First, we are...you guessed it..planning ahead. And second, a new industry provides badly needed jobs in this economy left behind by the PREVIOUS PRESIDENT.
    The money will go to universities, research grants and funding for further development of batteries and other components.
    How, exactly, does the money go to lazy people? Please explain your line of thinking.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Research New Cars

Go!


 
© 2011 MotorAuthority. All Rights Reserved. MotorAuthority is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.
 

Use the form below to send us a tip, give us feedback, or just say hello.

(max 750 characters)