Unrealistic Gas-Mileage Ratings Widen Gap With...

Rumor: Next Celica to be made by Subaru

 
11 4,498 views Feb 3, 2008
Follow Viknesh

Rumor: Next Celica to be made by Subaru

Rumor: Next Celica to be made by Subaru

Enlarge Photo
Back in November Toyota’s German Chief Markus Schrick confirmed Toyota was working on several new sports cars including a replacement for the Celica, and now Japanese magazines are claiming the new model will arrive as early as next year. The new car is said to be the joint-effort of a collaboration between Toyota and Subaru and it will reportedly be offered in two different variants, a cheaper GT model and a high-performance AWD GT-Four.

The two carmakers have been sharing production facilities and swapping engineers ever since Toyota bought a stake in Subaru early last year and these new sports cars are likely to be the first to be spawned from the partnership. The cheaper GT version is supposed to have a target price of under $20,000, Japan’s Best Car reports, which agree with earlier reports claiming Toyota was working on an affordable successor to the 1980’s AE86. The GT will feature a conventional front-engine RWD layout and will be powered by a naturally aspirated 2.0L Subaru four-cylinder boxer engine.

The more expensive GT-Four, meanwhile, will come with AWD as standard and get the same 300hp turbo four as the Japanese spec Subaru Impreza STI. According to the source, the engine in this car will be positioned closer to the firewall to help improve handling and it could also feature in-wheel electric motors to help traction.

Both cars will come in coupe and three-door hatch bodystyles and will be sourced from Subaru’s Gunma plant in Japan. No five-door hatch will be offered as Toyota and Subaru don’t want to compete with the current Impreza range.

Via: MotorTrend



Posted in:
 
Contribute
Send us a tip Comment Contact the editor
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (11)

  1. By Eljay Posted: 2/4/2008 10:37am PST

    Not a bad word about Subaru,but the Celica shoudl be all Toyota! Toyota may be completely unaware of it themselves,but they do in fact have a sportscar heritage that should be preserved,not diluted.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. By chris Posted: 2/4/2008 12:06pm PST

    i fail to see how rebadging an STi is diluting a marque like the celica.

    its a good idea.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. By Emily Posted: 2/4/2008 6:39pm PST

    agreed with chris, the celica now is hardly a sports car, the only thing sports car like about it is the fact that its 2 doors..awd eating machine ftw, the sti motors rock!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. By Jayce Spiva Posted: 2/4/2008 11:05pm PST

    AE86!!! PLEASE don't call it a celica!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. By Anthony Posted: 2/7/2008 6:36pm PST

    It's not going to be a Celica, it's going to be a REPLACEMENT for the Celica. If you disagree then scroll up and read the first sentence.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. By King Kong Posted: 2/7/2008 7:05pm PST

    I dont know why it wouldnt be called a celica. If its not being called a celica then maybe it should look diferent from a celica??? Although I have to agree on the mtr. The celica body is so light if they put 300 ponies under that hood, that things gonna fly.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. By Joe Posted: 3/7/2008 5:31am PST

    This not a news anymore. Toyota want to build a sport car, a cheaper and affordable model as AE series before. And this is not secret that Subaru share its boxer engine and AWD to the project.
    That of course should not be a Celica
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  8. By John Posted: 3/10/2008 4:35pm PDT

    Yes!. a Subota,Toyru,Tuyatu,Sobora,Tobata, Or Suyoru. Celica GT most likely to be Toyota Celica GT and Toyota Celica GT4.
    i love the boxer engines centre Gravity no need to drag the pistons like most V or Inline Engines. i wish subaru would make a 32 Valve MPFI DOHC Twin Turbo H8 and non Turbo H8's
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  9. By john Posted: 4/9/2008 8:48pm PDT

    its defenately not a bad idea. a long time ago they had an AWD celica. now theyre thinking of coming back with it...but with an sti engine? why is that bad? i understand letting the celica live its legacy, but come on...how can you go wrong with a celica and a sti engine?

    BTW, this is coming from an 05 sti owner.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  10. By HappyHair Posted: 5/21/2008 6:45am PDT

    You guys are missing the big picture. Call it what ever you want. Even if it's a basterization, what does it matter? If they keep the GTs weight down to say no more than 2800 lbs, it will be absolutely the best car in the american car market: Front engine, rear drive, 6 cogs, 4 seats, 2 doors, good on gas, $20K and a roof. Take your fancy pants AWD and your turbos, I want pure driving at it's most concentrated form, this is the car that the Mazda RX-8 could've been if it weren't for the Rotarys piss poor gas economy. I had an RX-8, and I loved it, but at the end of the day, it was too expensive to maintain for an average joe like me and I had to let it go. Thus I can't wait for this Toybaru. It will own.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  11. ma_Shogun avatar Shogun Posted: 11/4/2008 1:47am PST

    I just hope they're redesigning the eight-six, not just trying, to sell me the celicas base model...
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Connect with Facebook

Motor Authority. Now with your friends.

Discover stories your friends read.
Share stories more easily.
You control what you share.
Learn more

Research New Cars

Go!


More from High Gear Media

 
 
MotorAuthority
  • Follow Us
  • Twiiter
  • Facebook
 
 
© 2011 MotorAuthority. All Rights Reserved. MotorAuthority is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.