Aptera: It's Baaaaaaaaack! (We'll Believe It When...

NHTSA delays new roof-strengthening rules

 
1 785 views Jun 23, 2008
Follow Nelson

NHTSA delays new roof-strengthening rules

NHTSA delays new roof-strengthening rules

Enlarge Photo
More research and investigation into the necessary levels of strength for automobile roofs will be necessary before the Nation Highway Traffic Safey Administration (NHTSA) can submit a proposal to the U.S. Congress outlining the changes necessary to improve rollover safety. Other aspects of the new bill, such as the restriction on rollover lawsuits in state court, are also be reconsidered.

Congress had previously set a deadline of July 1, 2008 for the new legislative proposal from the NHTSA. The agency had been tasked with a rewrite of the law in 2005, due to concern with the 35-year-old policy's modern relevance after a series of notorious rollover lawsuits. Bringing such lawsuits in state court is currently not restricted, though a draft proposal from the NHTSA would add that restriction. Several senators involved in the proposal think that provision should be dropped, however, reports The Detroit News. The limitation on the constitutional rights of motorists to bring suit at the state level is unprecedented, according to the senators.

The roof-strengthening portion of the bill could require the roof to support 2.5 times the vehicle's own weight, up from the current standard of 1.5 times the vehicle weight. Additionally, both sides of a vehicle's roof would be tested under the new law, whereas current testing only examines one side of a car's roof. The NHTSA has previously said that such a change would result in a reduction of 13-44 deaths and 800 injuries due to rollover accidents in the U.S. each year. Despite the increase in safety, some advocates such as Ralph Nader, think even stronger roofs, able to support up to four times the vehicle's weight, are necessary.



Posted in:
 
Contribute
Send us a tip Comment Contact the editor
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comment (1)

  1. By Gus Posted: 6/23/2008 2:12pm PDT

    Only 13-44 deaths? That seems incredible small when you compare it to the 35,000 deaths a year.
    If that's all it saves, not worth it, and you know me, I'm a safety nut.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Connect with Facebook

Motor Authority. Now with your friends.

Discover stories your friends read.
Share stories more easily.
You control what you share.
Learn more

Research New Cars

Go!


More from High Gear Media

 
 
MotorAuthority
  • Follow Us
  • Twiiter
  • Facebook
 
 
© 2011 MotorAuthority. All Rights Reserved. MotorAuthority is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.