U.S. NHTSA considering stronger roof-crush standards
December 31st, 1969
Current roof-crush regulations require all cars sold in the U.S. to support 1.5 times their weight on their roofs on one side of the car. New rules proposed by the NHTSA would have the entire roof required to support 2.5 times the car's weight. Strong opposition is arising in the U.S. Senate, with senators making the issue a matter of states rights because of riders attached to the bill that would limit suits over failed roofs from being brought in state courts.
The costs of the increased requirements are expected to be high, but with more than 10,000 people dying in rollover accidents - nearly a third of all vehicular deaths - despite only 3% of crashes involving rollovers, the government agency feels the price of upgrade is worth it. Nevertheless, a 2005 report by the NHTSA said increasing the rollover standard to 2.5 times the vehicle weight would only save 13-44 lives and 800 injuries per year, according to the Detroit News.
Earlier this year a California court awarded a woman paralyzed in a Ford Explorer rollover $82.6 million in damages. The award was later confirmed by a California judge after a review performed at the request of the U.S. Supreme Court. A class-action suit brought by owners of Explorers for the decreased value brought about by the huge rollover verdict in the previous case ended in settlement in April. The case had been filed in at least five states.
The NHTSA's proposed changes would make it harder for suits to be brought against automakers at the state level, moving the claims instead to the Federal level, where rules are more uniform and not always as favorable to the consumer as state courts may be.
Current roof-crush regulations require all cars sold in the U.S. to support 1.5 times their weight on their roofs on one side of the car. New rules proposed by the NHTSA would have the entire roof required to support 2.5 times the car's weight. Strong opposition is arising in the U.S. Senate, with senators making the issue a matter of states rights because of riders attached to the bill that would limit suits over failed roofs from being brought in state courts.
The costs of the increased requirements are expected to be high, but with more than 10,000 people dying in rollover accidents - nearly a third of all vehicular deaths - despite only 3% of crashes involving rollovers, the government agency feels the price of upgrade is worth it. Nevertheless, a 2005 report by the NHTSA said increasing the rollover standard to 2.5 times the vehicle weight would only save 13-44 lives and 800 injuries per year, according to the Detroit News.
Earlier this year a California court awarded a woman paralyzed in a Ford Explorer rollover $82.6 million in damages. The award was later confirmed by a California judge after a review performed at the request of the U.S. Supreme Court. A class-action suit brought by owners of Explorers for the decreased value brought about by the huge rollover verdict in the previous case ended in settlement in April. The case had been filed in at least five states.
The NHTSA's proposed changes would make it harder for suits to be brought against automakers at the state level, moving the claims instead to the Federal level, where rules are more uniform and not always as favorable to the consumer as state courts may be.
The costs of the increased requirements are expected to be high, but with more than 10,000 people dying in rollover accidents - nearly a third of all vehicular deaths - despite only 3% of crashes involving rollovers, the government agency feels the price of upgrade is worth it. Nevertheless, a 2005 report by the NHTSA said increasing the rollover standard to 2.5 times the vehicle weight would only save 13-44 lives and 800 injuries per year, according to the Detroit News.
Earlier this year a California court awarded a woman paralyzed in a Ford Explorer rollover $82.6 million in damages. The award was later confirmed by a California judge after a review performed at the request of the U.S. Supreme Court. A class-action suit brought by owners of Explorers for the decreased value brought about by the huge rollover verdict in the previous case ended in settlement in April. The case had been filed in at least five states.
The NHTSA's proposed changes would make it harder for suits to be brought against automakers at the state level, moving the claims instead to the Federal level, where rules are more uniform and not always as favorable to the consumer as state courts may be.
More from MotorAuthority
-
11/06/2009
Opel Boss Carl-Peter Forster Calls It Quits
Carl-Peter Forster, GM group vice president and president of Opel, will be ...
-
11/06/2009
GM Czar Lutz Heading Back To Europe--To Opel?
GM's sudden decision this week to reverse path and keep Opel rather than ...
-
11/06/2009
Toyota To Put 2010 4Runner Through The Baja 1000 Wringer
Toyota's involvement in motorsports has been a hot topic this week with ...
More from High Gear Media
-
TheCarConnection.com | 11/07/2009
Driven: 2010 BMW ActiveHybrid X6
BMW's X6 "Sports Activity Coupe" is a car of contradictions. Our review ...
-
TheCarConnection.com | 11/06/2009
Opel CEO Calls It Quits, Rolls-Royce Hybrid: Today’s Car News
It’s official. The boss of Opel, Carl-Peter Forster, will be leaving ...
-
TheCarConnection.com | 11/06/2009
2010 Ford Focus
2010 FORD FOCUS STYLING | [6 out of 10] Kelley Blue Book: "Improved ...



Comments (1 total)
Meet the top commenters on the LeaderboardBy Gus #1, Posted: 6/4/2008
Wierd.
Either you do it or you don't, stop all this state to state nonsense.
Post a Comment
Sign In |