Advertisement

Top Gear Responds To Tesla Lawsuit

Follow Viknesh

Top Gear logo

Top Gear logo



Following last week’s shock announcement that Tesla is suing BBC’s Top Gear for libel and malicious falsehood stemming from a review of its all-electric Roadster, Top Gear executive producer Andy Wilman has released insight on the topic coming from the show’s side.

Due to the ongoing nature of the legal proceedings, Wilman's comments were quite reserved though he was quick to point out that Tesla is going to great lengths to promote its argument, with one of its PR firms even contacting another BBC program, The One Show, to see if it wanted to do an interview with a Tesla spokesman and take its Roadster for a spin.

As for the lawsuit, these are some of the defenses Top Gear will argue, as revealed by Wilman:

1. We never said that the Tesla’s true range is only 55 miles, as opposed to their own claim of 211, or that it had actually ran out of charge. In the film our actual words were: “We calculated that on our track it would run out after 55 miles”. The first point here is that the track is where we do our tests of sports cars and supercars, as has happened ever since Top Gear existed. This is where cars are driven fast and hard, and since Tesla calls its roadster “The Supercar. Redefined.” it seemed pretty logical to us that the right test was a track test. The second point is that the figure of 55 miles came not from our heads, but from Tesla’s boffins in California. They looked at the data from that car and calculated that, driven hard on our track, it would have a range of 55 miles.

2. We never said that the Tesla was completely immobilized as a result of the motor overheating. We said the car had “reduced power”. This was true.

3. Tesla claims we were lying when we said the brakes were “broken”. They now say that all that had happened was that the fuse to the vacuum pump had failed, which meant that the brake just had to be pushed down much harder than usual. Well – to my mind, if the brakes are broken, then they’re broken, and if this happened to your car, you’d take it to the garage to get it fixed. Odd it seems so trivial to Tesla now, because on the day of filming they insisted on repairing the fuse before we could carry on driving the car.

As for claims that Top Gear had condemned the Roadster in advance and was always going to give it a bad rating as per the on-air review, Wilman explained that the car was driven extensively before the review and that even without driving it the Roadster falls short--due to pricing and charge times--when next to a comparable gasoline-powered car.

So there you have a brief account of the thinking inside Top Gear. Now we’ll have to wait until court proceedings are revealed. Nevertheless, you can rest assure the MotorAuthority team will keep you updated on the topic. In the meantime, here's a link to a video of the review in question.

[Top Gear]
Advertisement
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (6)
  1. It would seem to me that driving a sports car on a race track would limit gas mileage no matter if it were electric or gas powered. For example if you drove a v-12 Euro sports cars full out on the same track how many MPG would you be getting less then 8! Come on their argument is ridiculous!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. In my mind, the Tesla is still forklift technology that hasn't progressed since 1909. Only the "Trend Setters will buy this and then it will go the way of the passenger pigeon.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. I never liked Tesla and I probably never will. I really don't like how they handled their HQ relocation process a few years ago, and now this bs. If they don't like the way BBC reviewed their car, then don't give it to them and don't b**ch about it... With an exception of James, they are all about power... What did you expect Tesla???
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. @dan aka blah blah- iwould implore you to watch a bit more Top Gear. your argument is unfounded, in every instance that the boys flog a supercar repeatedly ont he track they always highlight the fact that the mileage is rubbish. Lambo, Pagani, McMerc, Ford F40 etc
    the fact that the Tesla's calling card is its mileage benefits in a sports car then of course its going to be thrashed to an inch of its life to see if its true to its word. Tesla are very very very small fry in a huge pond, and run the risk of this being negative publicity that could harm them
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. I think this is absolutely ridiculous... Top Gear was being harsh, but fair about the car... Jeremy DID point out that in a race, it beat the car its designed was based off of (a Lotus Elise). I hope Tesla realizes that if they lose this lawsuit, it may very well be the thing that puts them out of business -.-
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. I think this is absolutely ridiculous... Top Gear was being harsh, but fair about the car... Jeremy DID point out that in a race, it beat the car its designed was based off of (a Lotus Elise). I hope Tesla realizes that if they lose this lawsuit, it may very well be the thing that puts them out of business -.-
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement

Take Us With You!

 
Advertisement
Advertisement

Research New Cars

Go!


 
© 2014 MotorAuthority. All Rights Reserved. MotorAuthority is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by izmo, Inc. Send us feedback.