Most Luxury Carmakers Crash And Burn In IIHS Top Safety Pick Ratings

 
Follow Nelson

Mercedes-Benz C-Class

Mercedes-Benz C-Class

Enlarge Photo

Lincoln MKS with EcoBoost

Lincoln MKS with EcoBoost

Enlarge Photo

Buick LaCrosse First Drive

Buick LaCrosse First Drive

Enlarge Photo

Twenty-seven of the country's safest cars were named as Top Safety Picks by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety today, and most luxury brand names were notably absent. For all their technology and advanced safety features, they apparently don't offer top-of-the-line crash test performance. American luxury brands actually fared better than either Japanese or German brands, too.

Of course, many luxury cars aren't tested much if at all due to the prohibitively high expense of doing so--most of Porsche's lineup are good examples. But the Mercedes-Benz C-Class (which actually is a Top Safety Pick) and the BMW 3-Series (not on the list) or Cadillac CTS (also not on the list) aren't exactly pricey, nor are many other mainstream luxury models.

Some of the big-name brands that completely failed to make the cut: Lexus, BMW, Jaguar, Saab, Cadillac and Acura. Volvo, on the other hand, made a huge showing, putting four models on the list, including the S80, C30, XC60 and XC90. Subaru put almost all of its models on the list, with the exception of the Impreza WRX.

Chrysler even made the top 27 with the Sebring, but only for the four-door when equipped with optional stability control. Volkswagen did quite well for itself, too, putting the Jetta and Passat sedans, and the Golf four-door among the Top Safety Pick ranks.

Audi only saw one model, the A3, make the cut, while Buick's new LaCrosse confirms it belongs at the head of the class, as did the Lincoln MKS.

No large SUVs--a bread-and-butter segment for many luxury brands--made the Top Safety Pick list at all, though Volvo's XC60 and XC90 crossovers and the Volkswagen Tiguan compact crossover did.

So despite the possible selection-bias in choosing cars to smash for safety ratings and the bias against larger SUVs and large cars--only four full-size sedans made the list--the near-absence of the bulk of the luxury car market from the IIHS's Top Safety Picks seems to indicate that you don't always get what you pay for, at least when it comes to safety.

Looking at it from the other direction, however, about one third of the cars on the Top Safety Pick list are from luxury or near-luxury brands, meaning they are over-represented in relationship to their share of total sales in the market place. But even with this sunny point of view, it's worth noting which brands did and didn't top the list.

See the full list for yourself below.

[IIHS]

Large cars
Buick LaCrosse
Ford Taurus
Lincoln MKS
Volvo S80

Midsize cars
Audi A3
Chevrolet Malibu built after October 2009
Chrysler Sebring 4-door with optional electronic stability control
Dodge Avenger with optional electronic stability control
Mercedes C class
Subaru Legacy
Subaru Outback
Volkswagen Jetta sedan
Volkswagen Passat sedan
Volvo C30

Small cars
Honda Civic 4-door models (except Si) with optional electronic stability control
Kia Soul
Nissan Cube
Subaru Impreza except WRX
Volkswagen Golf 4-door

Midsize SUVs
Dodge Journey
Subaru Tribeca
Volvo XC60
Volvo XC90

Small SUVs
Honda Element
Jeep Patriot with optional side torso airbags
Subaru Forester
Volkswagen Tiguan





 
Follow Us

People Who Read This Article Also Read

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (6)
  1. Where are the Acuras w/ the 5-Star safety rating?
    Any remind me why Ford wants to sell Volvo again - Seems like the excellent safety ratings are more than worth the $2Bn...
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. Yes it would be interesting to see why Acura & Honda mostly disappeared
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. Acura did receive a "good" rating from IIHS for their 2009 models.
    http://corporate.honda.com/press/article.aspx?id=4883
    These tests are moving targets... As soon as a manufacturer tweak their models to pass these tests, IIHS comes up with something else, it'll always be a leap frog game.
    Personally, I think these test gives a false sense of security. It steers the public away from the primary cause of most traffic crashes, operators. Why don't we test operators every year?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. "Why don't we test operators every year?"
    They're tested every day - but not in the way you think...
    It happens when the cellphone rings:
    Ignore till parked = Pass.
    Answer or return text = Fail.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. Nevermind these other distractions, most drivers simply lack basic car handling knowledge/skills. If IIHS puts as much effort into ensuring a driver is safe as they do with cars, then carmakers can spend less money chasing, and perhaps even charging less for their priducts.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. Ummm but if you are considering safety you have to consider rollover and single car accidents. It is hardly news that big stuff is more dangerous to little stuff, but all the various outlets always state that the combined operator safety gap isn’t there (over mid sized cars).It may get there eventually of course. But for the past 10 years if you want safety you buy a minivan and check all the little safety option boxes. No SUV is particularly impressive compared to that.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Connect with Facebook

Motor Authority. Now with your friends.

Discover stories your friends read.
Share stories more easily.
You control what you share.
Learn more

Research New Cars

Go!


 
© 2011 MotorAuthority. All Rights Reserved. MotorAuthority is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.