Audi A5 Aluminum Prototype Sheds 220-Pounds

 

2009 Audi A5 Aluminum Coupe Prototype

2009 Audi A5 Aluminum Coupe Prototype

Enlarge Photo

In the tradition of the Hollywood weight loss diet, Audi has revealed how to chop almost 220-pounds from its A5 Coupe with its latest Aluminum Prototype. Based around the A5 Coupe, Audi engineers have swapped steel for advanced aluminium and carbon-fiber construction in the interest of fuel economy, emissions reduction and handling agility.

Considering the fact that cars have been getting heavier due to increased safety features and higher feature specs, only a few car companies have managed to reverse the trend in their own cars.

Taking an existing steel-bodied production car as its basis, the A5 project car clearly demonstrates the benefits of the aluminum Audi Space Frame (ASF) concept. Use of the ASF principle reduces the weight of a car body by at least 40% compared with conventional steel construction, and this shows in a curb weight of 2,888-pounds for the aluminum A5 prototype, versus a total of 3,130-pounds for the equivalent steel-bodied series production model.

The lighter weight means the A5 Coupe Aluminum Prototype powered by a four-cylinder engine offers the same performance of a V-6.

The lightweight design of the test car not only enables a smaller engine to supplement a larger one with no impact on performance and gains in economy and emissions, but also has a knock-on effect on ancillaries such as the brakes and transmission, which can also be reduced in size and weight. It also benefits handling and dynamics thanks to the reduction in unsprung weight.





 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
Comments (3)
  1. Read up on Colin Chapman: weight is the enemy!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. So you are telling me that Less Weight = Better MPGs and Better performance. Duhhhhh!!!! Why did it take Vehicle Manufacturers this long to figure it out?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. "Lighter weight means... an [I4] offers the performance of a V-6..." and brakes can be reduced in size. Huh? Perhaps 0-60 & 1/4 mile performance is comparable, but this ignores the changes in torque curve, NVH, and payload capacity. The displacement/cylinder reduction itself may account for add'l weight loss, but will never offer apples-to-apples performance or offset the benefits of larger brakes, especially when your 220lb. budd(ies) joins you for a ride. Further, aluminum construction in the A8 and BMW 5-series (among others) has created nasty surprises for owners/insurers repairing damaged vehicles. This isn't a viable weight-loss strategy exccept for the upper-end of the consumer market. Perhaps the most efficient vehicle weight loss strategy isn't the car, but the occupant? Right motivation, questionable method, and wrong conclusion.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Research New Cars

Go!


 
© 2011 MotorAuthority. All Rights Reserved. MotorAuthority is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.
 

Use the form below to send us a tip, give us feedback, or just say hello.

(max 750 characters)