
camaro z28 preview 008
When General Motors' financial situation turned from serious to bankruptcy-bound, two of the first models to get pushed back or canceled were the
2010 Chevrolet Camaro Convertible and the ultra-performance Z28 variant. Just a couple weeks ago, talk of the Z28's revival was bubbling out of GM, but today a new report has Bob Lutz hinting that the car isn't on the production list.
In late June a group of GM officials held a question and answer session at the Carlisle Nationals event in Pennsylvania, and the enthusiasts over at
Camaro5 got new confirmation that the
Camaro Z28 is in fact still on the table.
But today
Automobile published a report quoting Bob Lutz, GM's un-retired product guru, as saying, "I think the V6 Camaro is probably a very good model for the future of the high-performance car in America. The Solstice coupe with the 2.0-liter turbo engine is another good expression of the future of the high-performance car, which is smaller, lighter, more fuel-efficient, and probably with lower displacement, but with a turbocharger.”
That formula does not compute with the rumored LS V8 adaptation that had been planned for the Z28. But this isn't the first time news of the Z28's demise has come, and don't be surprised if GM flip-flops yet again.
The Z28 had previously been pushed back until after the early 2011 debut of the Camaro
Convertible, and
feared to be all but canceled. Reports from earlier this year said the
design of the Camaro Z28 was complete, but that the project wouldn't be going forward due to a low expected sales rate and high per-unit costs.
Those earlier plans had a version of the LSA V8 found in the
new Cadillac CTS-V, rated at 556hp (414kW) and good for a 0-60mph time likely under 4 seconds with a shot at a high-11-second quarter mile time.
Those would be fantastic numbers for a Camaro, and would certainly be enough to put the Camaro firmly in the lead for this round of the muscle car wars - if it's ever built.
Chevrolet Camaro Z28 preview 2008
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!
dump the damned engine in that car.. charge an exhuberant price for it... the dealer markup will be 5 grand anyways. get your asses out of debt by climbing on the backs of the motor heads.
seriously.
apple knows how to make a product that may be utter crap, not a deal in any right, however it has market appeal and therefore they can charge what ever the hell they want for their stuff. its called good business. THIS is why the american 3 got in trouble in the first place. making products that no one wanted and then pricing them to move. and then not recognizing a gold mine when they had a barrel full of gold sitting right in front of them.
dealer mark ups mean that your marketing division didnt price the vehicle right. thats money you should be making.
A 550hp Z28 would blow every Mustang ever built out of the water and remind everyone who really dominates the pony car wars when they want to. But make it handle better too; don't just add power.
Personally I'd never buy one. These things look great from a distance, but up close they are enormous. There's so much tire/fender gap on the Camaro that I could almost climb in there to inspect the shocks. They dwarf the 'Vette and the prior F-body design. And I'd rather drive a Pontiac Aztek than have to look at the hideous dashboard they put in the latest Camaro.
But still, build it. Lots of people love this car, and GM should use it to re-establish a good name for themselves.
My '85 Trans Am with the WS-6 package had maybe half the fender gap of the new Camaro I looked at the other day.
As BMW has proven, there is no need to have, or not to have, a fender gap on a production car. It's just a question of style. Trucks probably still need fender gap for off-road suspension travel, but cars don't.
By xmas presents Posted: 12/6/2009 11:35pm PST
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!