Advertisement

2010 Saab 9-5 Preview

 
Follow Viknesh

2010 Saab 9-5

2010 Saab 9-5

2010 Saab 9-5

Enlarge Photo

The Saab 9-5 is long overdue for an overhaul, with the basic mechanical underpinnings in the current model first hitting streets as far back as 1997. A totally redesigned model was expected to make an appearance last year but its release was pushed back due to limited resources at Saab and the introduction of the facelifted 9-3, not to mention the company’s then-ongoing ownership limbo. But the wait for the next 9-5 will soon be over as the car is scheduled to make its world debut next month at the Frankfurt Auto Show.


Images for the car have been out for some time now, showing a clear resurgence of Saab's past design traits married to a modern, sleek profile, and now the company has released official details and specs.

Underneath the new sheet metal is a heavily revised version of General Motors’ front-wheel-drive Epsilon II platform, which is also shared by Opel for its new Insignia range. To differentiate Saab as a premium product engineers have provided a stiffer suspension set-up, a new steering rack and a different range of electronics.

The car’s all-turbocharged powertrain lineup is the broadest ever offered by Saab, with customers able to select from a choice of three fuels--petrol, diesel and E85 bioethanol.

At launch, there will be a 2.0-liter four-cylinder turbodiesel with 160 horsepower, a 2.0-liter four-cylinder turbocharged gasoline unit with 220 horsepower and a range-topping 2.8-liter turbo V-6 gasoline unit with 300 horsepower on tap.

Shortly after launch, a 1.6-litre gasoline turbo with 180 horsepower will be introduced, together with a 2.0-liter BioPower E85 engine. All transmissions will be six-speed.

The array of high-tech features continues inside, including a head-up information display (HUD), bi-xenon adaptive headlights, adaptive cruise control; Saab DriveSense adaptive chassis with real-time damping control, keyless entry and starting, dual-zone climate control, a parking assistant, and Saab’s XWD all-wheel-drive system with an eLSD.

Infotainment choices include a range-topping Harman Kardon 5.1 channel surround sound audio system and an 8-inch color touch screen navigation system with hard disk storage for map data and 10 GB for MP3 music files. A large center console provides storage and connections for several portable devices through USB and 3.5 mm AUX ports alongside a 12 V power outlet.

Rear passengers can even access their own audio or watch a DVD. The rear seat entertainment unit in the back of the center console accommodates audio controls and folding viewing screens are installed in the backs of the front seats. Wireless headphones are provided for listening and viewing.

The new 9-5 will be built at Saab’s home plant in Trollhattan, where it has been engineered, and production is tipped to start by the end of the year.





 
 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (42)
  1. Wow that really looks nice... and the wagon ( believe it's more of a hatch ) is very similar in design to Subaru's Impreza hatch.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. looks like the current sonata. with the canopy from the GT-R.

    never have likes saabs.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. Love the look of this car. Looks modern, tough and purposeful stance, with just about the right amount of sporty and SAAB retro touches, such as the dark A pillar which evokes the SAAB 90's windshield.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. I think this is a lot better than the new Jag XJ.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. im so glad they took more risk and actual design in this saab the last few models r damn boring!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. it has awkward curves... but i think its good that saab took the risk.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. they really shoud rethink the front of their saabs :s
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  8. I wish it was a little more aggressive, however like it overall very much.

    The dashboard, in particular the instrument cluster is a mess, an utter mess. Disgusted by the plastic and analogue instrument gauges! They should have taken a look at what the 2010 Range Rover instrument cluster looks like!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  9. The exterior looks quite handsome, if a little safe. Agree that the interior looks a bit plasticky, though.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  10. I wish they kept the two side grills instead of integrating them into the headlamp. It makes the center one looks big like the Audi. Interior is a mess. Please get rid of the L shape dashboard outline. For some reason it doesn't feel like a Saab. It looks like a hybrid of different car exterior design.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  11. That's one seriously handsome sedan. Will be interesting to see it in the flesh, hopefully won't be as plasticky as the current 9-3.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  12. Much better then the current one
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  13. saab, change the interior. I can live with the l shape layout, audi uses it and caters to the driver! Yet the instrument cluster is an absolute mess!

    Did you have someone at gaz of russia design it? My god, for a company that touts it's aviation heritage< did you have to stay with the biplane technology?

    And yes i am indeed yelling!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  14. Wow - that is the best looking Saab for quite a while!! I have to say that the windows look a little small (should have continued back for an inch or two past the rear door) and the interior - while definitely a step forward for Saab - is not very pleasant. I love the look of the back of this thing, it is beautiful, but Saab are still just taking bits of all the other European manufacturers and mixing them together awkwardly. Still excited by it though!!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  15. Vanilla
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  16. it's different.
    the interior is a travesty. i give it five years after the first one rolls off the line before they have to kill it off.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  17. I've liked the look of Saab's for years. The 99's, the 900's, etc. This is OK I suppose. I mean the 9-5 was pretty much the Methuselah of automobile designs and it needed updating right now, but this just looks uninspired. To me, and this is just my opinion obviously, the back end looks strangely bulbous and that effect isn't helped any by the strange look of that C pillar. And the comments above about the instrument cluster seem pretty spot on... the whole dash design looks entirely too busy really.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  18. I'm glad to see they are at least trying for some of the '80's charm....but keep trying guys. A modern day 900 SPG sport hatch would be a start...still regret selling my '89. Despite some positive traits of this new 9-5, I still have a hard time seeing it as an example of quirky, smart Scandinavian-artistic functionality, which produced a cult following of older Saab models.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  19. IT WILL NOT BE BUILT IN RUSSELSHEIM BUT IN TROLLHÄTTAN (SWEDEN) INSTEAD!!!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  20. The rear looks like clone Hyundai AZERA.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  21. "the interior is a travesty. i give it five years after the first one rolls off the line before they have to kill it off."
    It's the same fundamental interior design that's been in Saabs for 30 years. It isn't going anywhere.
    "The rear looks like clone Hyundai AZERA."
    No, it looks like a Saab 900/9000... which predates the Azera by some 25 years, and is incidentally exactly how a Saab should look.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  22. As with most Saabs - much more attractive in darker colors than silver or white.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  23. This car is a piece of crap! It is inferior to all other cars on the market.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  24. TripleOneFive, you must be smoking something funny. The engines look good, one with over 300 hp should be great.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  25. How is it that the first comments date back to June and July when the article was written on August 27? I've noticed the same thing happening on a lot of posts here on Motorauthority, are you guys recycling the same stories?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  26. Never been a SAAB man but this is quite simply stunning. Brilliant design front to back.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  27. I hate those taillights!! would have looked so much better if they turned upside down...rather than making it look like a grin.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  28. The back looks awful. Like a Japanese car. Should be redone.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  29. Sucks to be Saab, this 9-5 design is GM inspired via Cadillac STS, look again at the slab sides, rear deck and belt line. This is a Cadillac with a Saab front end. Grotesque! A Saab-a-lac! this is the same cloning they tried with Subaru and failed. GM has got to fade away from Saab they have driven down quality and homogenized Saab design to the point they are unrecognizible. I have owned 6 Saabs since 1984 and the GM built ones where absolutely the worst. I'll wait until Koneigsegg designs and engineering are infused into Saab before I would buy this GM leftover design travesty.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  30. OMG !!, this is the ugliest SAAB. WTF is going on. I have seen better designs from 2nd year autobody design students. Is this the best they could come up after dragging the current 9-5 body style for 10 year !!.. Why would any one spend $40K+ on this Saab rather than buying a BMW/Lexis/Mercedes/Infinity/Acura/Audi (all of these have similar safety and way better resale than a Dying Saab brand). !! this is when we say "GO BACK AND GO IT ALL OVER AGAIN" !!!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  31. That is a Buick !!! NOT A SAAB.
    good luck selling this loser.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  32. This is not a SAAB! It has GM and America written all over it! Nothing Scandinavian at all about this one. Maybe they can sell it in the US, but I seriously doubt that any Europeans will even look at this one, even the SAAB fanatics. Please GM, next time do a little marketing research and listen to what the customers want before you try to reinvent the wheel!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  33. I love the aeronautical themes that are, more so than ever, stronger in this model. From the cockpit DLO to the afterburner-like tail lamps. How cool is that 'hungry for air' grille(s) at the front! I put some of my explanations onto the images at http://bit.ly/31t9JT
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  34. GM messed things up for our beloved SAAB, i really don't like this new design, I miss those SPGS, now classic 900's, when SAAB used to make tanks.
    That is why i still have my 1995 conv 900.
    No sir!! will not change it for any plastic looking
    american auto, even if it has that beautiful emblem. come on SAAB go back to the 1980's!!!!!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  35. the only good looking saab is a 9-3 aero. every other model looks like it was designed by a three year old who still draws his dog taller than his box house, thinks his family has blue skin and draws everones arms coming out of their waist.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  36. If they make it, I'll buy it.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  37. Michael 1963, from Pescara, Italy
    Sono preoccupato per il futuro della SAAB!! Forza e coraggio! Spero che resti in G.M. e finalmente la valorizzino per quello che merita!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  38. Too heavy, too late.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  39. Get them on the road, live, you will see the beauty of this car.
    Saab, please stop MSRP ing vs BMW, Audi, MB and get you niche, which is NEAR luxury, but a lot of car for the money. My 98 was bought new for 8 of sticker in Chicago.
    I am on number six, 900SPG (my favorite), 92 9000 Griffen, in shop more than home (tried to compete with MB, BMW), 99 9-5 fantastic, 2002 9-5 aero wagon, one of my best, should have drove that for much more, an now a 98 9-3 Aero sedan loaded, and 99 9-3 Combi, basic. The comfort, gas mileage, power and 4 year 50K warranty makes me usually buy one a year old, but ONSTAR (poorly marketed), Saab Safety, , let me feel good about my wife and kids in a safe car, and not one on every corner, I enjoy them. Surprised to see all the comments, this Saab is amazing in person, back to the Sweeden, keep them rolling, safe and economical, yet speed, great power if you need it. Aero will do 150 and hug the road. Combi will hit 34 mpg at 70-80 miles per hour.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  40. love the look. hope it drives as well as it looks. I wish them well as an independent company. GM sucked the life out of them and so homogenized the brand that there was nothing compelling about it. With the new 9-5 and a 9-4x coming and a new 9-3 coming in a couple of years--the future looks better than it has in years. Thanks to Victor Muller for taking the risk
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  41. I think this car is beautiful. Great lines. Not too bulgy like a lot of automakers are going for today. Great design interior and exterior. This is what Saab needs. For all those who think this design is bad or untrue to Saab, I simply don't understand you.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  42. It looks really good from behind.. but there are something wrong with the front and side. Don't like the front lights/grill. Just copy from the old model, and make it more agressive.
    And I hate the front screen/roof angle/design. It dislike it so much that I will not consider this car when I'm buying a new in 2011.
    But the design from behind is nice...
    If they survive a few years on their own.. they might come up with a new design here.
    Would be nice.
    I hoped Koenigsegg would have bought them. They have an excellent designer - and they can create hype.
    Just hope Spyker can make a change here.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Follow Us

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Research New Cars

Go!

Related Used Listings

Browse used listings in your area.


 
© 2013 MotorAuthority. All Rights Reserved. MotorAuthority is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.