2013 Hyundai Elantra Coupe, Nissan 370Z, Super...

EU announces plan for mandatory daytime running lights by 2011

 
20 6,071 views September 24, 2008

EU claims daytime running lights could help reduce fatal accidents by 3-5%

EU claims daytime running lights could help reduce fatal accidents by 3-5%

Enlarge Photo
The European Commission has announced plans to make it mandatory for all new cars to be fitted with daytime running lights (DRLs) as standard from 2011, and on trucks and buses one and a half years later. Despite widespread opposition from carmakers, the issue was raised once again on the back of research conducted by the EU that shows DRLs could potentially help reduce fatal accidents by 3-5%.

"The introduction of DRLs for cars, trucks and buses makes them more visible, which will increase road safety. This will make a positive contribution to our goal of reducing fatalities on European roads whilst being more fuel efficient then existing lights," said European Commission vice president Günter Verheugen.

Carmakers are opposed to the ruling because they claim there is a risk that some drivers will forget to switch on their headlights at night. They also believe there could be confusion among road users between these lights and front fog lamps, reports the Telegraph.

The use of daytime running lights also leads to fuel efficiency losses, with increases in fuel consumption of 0.5%-1% not unreasonable. However this is being reduced greatly by the increasing number of cars using LEDs for this function.

The law is still subject to the approval of both European ministers and the European parliament, but it is expected to be passed unopposed as it is already backed by Robert Gifford, the executive director of the Parliamentary Advisory Council for Transport Safety.



Tags:
Posted in:
 
Contribute
Send us a tip Comment Contact the editor
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
Comments (20)

  1. By chris Posted: 2/11/2008 10:47am PST

    again, as a younger Canadian who has lived with this kind of legislation all his life, I really don't get what all the fuss is about.

    the technology costs PENNIES if anything at all, and like it's said, you don't exactly notice a drop in available power when you turn your headlamps on. so whats the argument?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. By Alex Posted: 2/11/2008 11:12am PST

    Who the hell care?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. By Mike Posted: 2/11/2008 12:59pm PST

    I don't understand all the fuss. In Canada DRLs have been mandatory for almost 20 years. And I would say they are a great safety feature. Even on a clear day, you can see oncoming traffic from a much further distance.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. By James Posted: 2/11/2008 2:56pm PST

    I absolutely support this legislation. I live in Latvia, where the same way as it is in the rest of Baltic states and all of Northern Europe, lights are mandatory 24/7. This law was introduced many years ago and I still remember that there was some public resistance. But now no one would question the safety benefit of this. I always feel strange and less safe when I travel with car in countries where drivers don't use lights during daytime.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. By chris Posted: 2/11/2008 3:26pm PST

    james; i live close to the boarder with the USA and drive there frequently; i know exactly what you mean.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. By ST Posted: 2/11/2008 3:42pm PST

    Sure DRL are fine... when not many people have them and that's when people notice them. But when everyone has them, it's like they aren't on at all. Why not start painting the cars in only florescent yellow and orange. Benefits...well, put it this way, I won't notice surrounding cars better than I already do. It's called looking around as opposed to relying on some bright object in your peripheral vision. Then again, govt hand out drivers' licenses like it was going out of fashion.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. By HECTOR Posted: 2/11/2008 7:01pm PST

    I see that I am outnumbered here but...

    DRLs are the evil brainchild of some retarded bastard/s. Far from being a safety tool they are highly dangerous to pedestrians and motorcyclists. There's absolutely zero convincing and proven evidence that they prevent accidents but then again logic tells me this without the need for fake studies.

    But, by all means, shine braight high beam headlights in my eyes. It's not like I need my corneas or anything.

    PS - if it's dark where you live... why don't you try turning on the lights for yourself? I live in a place where it's sunny about 90% of the year. Why must you force your lights on me? Next up: windshield wipers that are constantly on. After all, it rains a lot in Hawaii so let's force all cars to have nonstop windshield wipers, even if they're sold in the Mohave desert.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  8. By Jason Posted: 2/12/2008 12:49am PST

    DRLs are a wonderful idea, and the NHTSA should mandate them in the USA. They're less powerful than headlights, but improve visibility at all hours. The biggest advantage, though, is that it provides me some warning when bloody morons go driving around hours after sunset with *no lights on at all*. This seems to happen to me every few weeks, and several times it has been dangerous; if there aren't many streetlights, it's hard to tell that a car is there at all. At least with DRLs you would see some light as it approaches, even if the person is too irretrievably stupid to turn on their headlights properly.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  9. By Duane Barber Posted: 2/29/2008 7:16pm PST

    I am amazed that none of the comments address the very real issue that the driving population is aging. With aging (40 plus) there are astigimatism / cataract replacement and CME conditions that are normally not an issue until the eye is forced to look at many cars in oncoming traffic all with various colors and angles of light. i.e. drivers are momentarily blinded during the day and the eye can feel real pain at night with the Xenon daytime lights yet on. The DRLs are nothing more than a fashion statement that is very dangerous to other drivers. Should some with common sense may want to put yellow markers below the.bumper at the corners and that may be helpfull. DRLs are amlost as usefull as the sun visor stickers that tell Americans the airbags do not work. Jason should realize that the automatic nightime lights are standard on most cars and turn on the tail lights also. His observation is not complete as The DRLs do not turn on the tail lights.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  10. By Richard Posted: 3/13/2008 10:37am PDT

    Please note that GM convinced the US Government to let it use half powered high beams as DRL's. This has caused a flod of complaints about glare. These complaints are well founded. Canada has adopted the US requirements in this regard. The EU does not permit high beams for use as DRL's.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  11. By John Cargill Posted: 6/10/2008 4:45pm PDT

    I really support DRL use. I have them in my GM products and I really think they aid in driving because you can see them in front and behind you. Ford and Chrysler are to cheap to install them. I am trying to figure out how to turn them on in my 2006 Dodge Grand Caravan SXT. So far it has been a struggle. I anyone knows how, let me know. It will make the vehicle much safer.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  12. By Raymond Posted: 7/25/2008 1:26am PDT

    im all for day time running lights and i cant wait for the day that the USA steps up to bat and requires them on all cars. my 1997 dodge grand caravan does not have them but i turn on my head lights everytime i start the engine. TO John Cargill: take your 2006 caravan SXT to your local dodge dealer and find out if your mini van in canadian made. if so and your DRLs are not working its just a simple hook up to the vans computer to turn them on. should cost less the $40.00 to do the job. i belive DRLs are a wonderful accident saveing device and it makes all cars much more visable in most if not all conditions.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  13. ma_HECTOR avatar HECTOR Posted: 9/24/2008 4:57pm PDT

    Shoot me.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  14. ma_gus avatar Gus Chyba Posted: 9/24/2008 5:51pm PDT

    I knew Hector would be upset.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  15. ma_NoNameDenton avatar NoNameDenton Posted: 9/24/2008 8:33pm PDT

    Personally, I do not see the point, but some studies say these things cause less accidents.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  16. ma_www.mywheelsonwalls.com avatar www.mywheelsonwalls.com Posted: 9/24/2008 9:57pm PDT

    I really cant see the problem here either. Also just because your DRL's are on does not mean your dash board lights are also on, so fogetting to turn on your lights at night is a mute point. Unless you can read dark gauges which in my car are illuminated by turning the head lights on, electro luminesent I believe they call them.

    As for seeing cars better. With heat rising up off of black top I challenge you to tell me which car is easier to see in day light? Hawaii may have a rainy season but it also has heat just like the Mojave.

    Unfortunately for some this is one of those issues where common sense and the feeling that government maybe to involved, skirt a very fine line.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  17. ma_dcars avatar dcars Posted: 9/25/2008 5:53am PDT

    I've had them on all my cars as long as I can rememeber and can see any reason why they shouldn't be left on. Seams like a inexpensive way to safe.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  18. ma_tache avatar tache Posted: 9/26/2008 10:20pm PDT

    if the VIN code starts with 2, than the car is made in Canada

    I live in Canada, where DRL are mandatory and I'm changing my headligths bulbs every 6 months
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  19. By  Edward Posted: 8/24/2009 6:39am PDT

    Another way to get DRLs is through http://www.automotiveelectronicaccessories.com. The kit runs just under $45.00 including shipping and handling. The kit works on any vehicle.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  20. By Raymond ny state Posted: 2/11/2010 8:57pm PST

    9 months ago i purchesed a 2007 Dodge Grand Caravan SXT. when i saw the van, i told the dealer that it's impairitive that this DGC SXT is equiped and has functional day time runing lights and if not, he must take the van to the dodge dealer to activate them or deal is off! well when i stated the van for a test drive, they were on and fully functional and was grateful. if you come across the 01-07 chrysler van with out DRL'S, make the dealer turn them on or take the van to the dodge or chrysler dealer and simply access the computer and turn them on. if their an upstanding dealership, they wont charge you for something that take less then 2 min to do. for all the people that don't like day time running lights, you can simply go to your local dealer and have them turned off, but really why would you do this? DRL's are the best invention and a wonderful accident saveing device in all aspects of driveing! one day the good ol us of a will sign it into law for required DRL'S. you can count on it, its comeing!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Research New Cars

Go!


More from High Gear Media

 
 
MotorAuthority
  • Follow Us
  • Twiiter
  • Facebook
 
 
© 2011 MotorAuthority. All Rights Reserved. MotorAuthority is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.
 

Use the form below to send us a tip, give us feedback, or just say hello.

(max 750 characters)