
California easing zero-emissions mandate for carmakers
Enlarge Photo
California may be well known for its stance against pollution when it comes to legislating on emissions rules, but environmentalists have become incensed about the state’s increasingly lax attitude towards reducing pollution through regulation of new zero-emissions vehicles.
In 1990, California adopted legislation that required 10% of carmakers’ fleets be zero-emissions vehicles by 2003. When it became clear this goal wasn’t going to be reached, the rule was changed to include ‘low-emissions’ vehicles as well (i.e. hydrogen cars,
hybrids and even cleaner-burning petrol vehicles). However, in an attempt to regain credibility, the 2003 changes also mandated there be 25,000 zero-emissions vehicles on the road by 2014, reports the
Associated Press.
Meanwhile, there is still no mainstream zero-emissions vehicle and now recommendations to the state’s Air Resources Board is claiming the newer 25,000 number be reduced to just 2,500 because the goal is too hard for carmakers. The setbacks have been blamed on the high cost of research and manufacture of zero-emissions vehicles, which are still deemed non-financially viable for the mass market.
The government is yet to make a decision on revising the regulations once again but any move to soften the rules would only reduce pressure on carmakers to produce zero-emissions vehicle, a move considered counterproductive and irresponsible by environmentalists.
Pictured above is the all-electric
Tesla Roadster, one of the few true zero-emissions vehicles.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!
By chris Posted: 3/27/2008 7:26am PDT
Gus, you need to do a better job of keeping the pot out of that state...... buncha hippies.
no really though, Gus, like you and i have both said, let the market decide. as soon as there is an all electric vehicle available to the masses in california, people will stand in line for days just to look at the thing, and THEN the big makers will really see.
By Gus Posted: 3/27/2008 10:10am PDT
We'll see what happens. It always seems to happen here first, though...for better or worse...
By Fritz Posted: 3/27/2008 10:28am PDT
By ohmy Posted: 3/27/2008 11:05am PDT
By van der wath Posted: 3/27/2008 11:50am PDT
By Gus Posted: 3/27/2008 11:51am PDT
The fact of the matter is, however, that California is the world's largest single car market, and as such they can push harder than anyone...
By HECTOR Posted: 3/27/2008 6:11pm PDT
By chris Posted: 3/28/2008 10:42am PDT
van der wath; i'd love to see the day. trust me. I've said it before; i'm an electrical engineer. I do what I do because I want to make stuff more efficient. I want to find that power source that is clean. 100%. the real hippies are the engineers. we all are driven to make things better. not because we want to save the planet, but because we just want shit to be better. personally i want to see a zero emission world. not cause i think the ice is going to melt and kill us all or some crap like that, but because we just DONT KNOW what the hell were doing. we cant know for sure. it could be much worse than we predict. it could be nothing at all. scaring people into being green by saying that in 10 years time we will have put the world into a runaway greenhouse cycle is completely unethical. you dont know that. your indications are as such, in the worst case assumptions.
If you told every climatologist to estimate when the world will become inhospitable... and then told them u were going to find them on that day and kill them if they were wrong, not a single one of them would give you a date.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!