
shelby gt500kr 001

2008 Shelby GT500KR gets Ford's first-ever carbon fiber hood
Enlarge PhotoAlthough the Shelby GT500KR is hardly at risk of being taken as an ordinary Mustang - even by the only mildly observant eye - Ford has seen fit to update the car for its 2008 run with a new carbon fiber hood - the first-ever production use of carbon fiber for either Ford or Shelby. The 540hp muscle car matches the output of last year's 40th anniversary limited edition, and only 1,000 are going to be made.
The new hood looks mean enough, but Ford says it's only there for go, not for show.
“It’s there purely for performance. It brings important aerodynamic and weight-reduction benefits that translate into enhanced performance for our new King of the Road,” said Ford SVT chief program engineer Jamal Hameedi.
And go it does, helping the King of the Road achieve its 40hp boost over the standard GT500.
The idea behind the hood's aerodynamics is to create two pressure regions under the hood - scooping air into the intake and sucking hot engine bay air out the back of the hood. This is done in part by the vents at the front and rear of the hood, but also due to the underside structure of the hood, which was made possible by the use of carbon fiber.
The improved airflow and decreased engine bay temperatures help the supercharged car use its intercooler more efficiently, since it is one of the primary contributors to under-hood heat, aside from the engine itself, of course.
For more on the GT500KR, read our
original story on the new bump in production numbers.
2008 Shelby GT500KR
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!
By chris Posted: 4/28/2008 2:06pm PDT
I can live with that. Makes me wonder what the heck they did with it that required CF over steel.
heck.. i dont care. I'm just glad they didnt say that they used CF to save 40 lbs of weight on a hood that covers an engine thats gotta weigh 600 lbs at least, in a car thats probably pushing 2 tonnes.
By ohmy Posted: 4/28/2008 3:27pm PDT
By chris Posted: 4/28/2008 3:33pm PDT
By Roy Posted: 4/28/2008 3:37pm PDT
By Gus Posted: 4/28/2008 3:42pm PDT
My Mustang is longer than a Ford Explorer and wieghs more than the Mustang GT I replaced it with. But that's kind of what I wanted, a car that rides nice, handles reasonably well and actually squats down at freeway speed when you step on the gas... :)
I'll look forward to seeing some down here, I'm sure in this land of Lamborghinis there will be a few nutcases willing to fork over a huge dealer markup for what is really just a souped up Mustang...
By Wizards Lore Posted: 4/28/2008 5:53pm PDT
By MyWheelsOnwalls.com Posted: 4/28/2008 6:14pm PDT
The funny part is that Ford claims an independent rear suspenion would make the car to expensive! Seems to me that someone at Ford is just plain old lazy......
By chris Posted: 4/29/2008 7:55am PDT
wizard, MWOW is right. it's called dealer mark up. the car has a list price of 60k (which is maybe 80k in AU$). the problem is there are far too many people who want it, so it gets marked up like a korean T-shirt.
everyone complains about these mark ups but what do you expect? if i can buy something for 50 dollars and it is so rare that other people will buy it off me for as much as 500 dollars, then what do you care if i flip it for profit?
MWOW; typically, the mustang stayed with the live axel because of two reasons: it is cheap and that was always the point of the mustang; bang for the buck. and the second reason is there is nothing that can put up with more punishment than a live rear axle. the mustang was always intended as a cheap bare bones essential car that would be easy to work on and easy to make better. people want to kit their mustangs to rediculous power levels, and ford wont go IRS because they dont want axles breaking from muscle heads strapping huge superchargers on their mustangs. when's the last time you heard of a mustangs drive train breaking? its a tractor.
that being said the next mustang is supposed to be IRS.
By MyWheelsOnWalls.com Posted: 4/29/2008 9:20am PDT
Which may not be a bad thing as its one less Mustang I have to look at!
Then again the Cobra R of 2002 I believe had an IRS rear and than had huge amounts of power and was fun to drive! novel idea.
P.S. Chris kudo's on your capilist thinking on dealer markups! Your coming around, whats next an "I love dubba" T-shirt?
By chris Posted: 4/29/2008 10:51am PDT
and yes you're absolutely right. the cobra R was a stunning car. but it wasn't street legal in many parts of the world and it was stupendously expensive. to the point where the DEALERS wouldn't even buy them. they would hardly even broker the purchase of one.
plus let's remember the Cobra R was basically ford's answer to the ZR1, the GT3, or something like that. a car with no carpet, no radio, no air, and a roll cage. hardly the normal kind of car.
people need to lower their expectations of the mustang. It's a K car with power.
By Jobs for Felons Posted: 11/10/2009 1:21pm PST
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!