
Obama and McCain sympathize with GM, Bush rejects any bailout plans
Senators John McCain and Barack Obama have both sympathized with the major carmakers and the auto workers who may have lost their jobs in GM's corporate restructuring. Both presumptive Presidential nominees remarked that the development was evidence of the tough economic times hitting America.
Speaking in Washington, Obama stated that "America's auto workers are not just the backbone of our economy, they are on the front lines of our effort to produce the next generation of clean vehicles." He also recognized that the effects of GM's restructuring has a flow-on effect to "countless suppliers, small businesses and communities."
McCain echoed these sentiments, with a spokeswoman for his campaign citing high energy prices as the "root cause of many of these problems". Obama hit the nail on the head more effectively, stating that domestic automakers were in a "perfect storm of record gas prices, rising steel prices, a credit market contraction that has made it more difficult for consumers to purchase autos, and a weakening economy that has shed jobs for six straight months."
Meanwhile, President Bush has rejected requests to bailout auto manufacturers such as GM, stating that it is not the role of the government to act as a fall back for any struggling enterprise. GM has stated that they never requested a bailout from the government, and that the situation is entirely on their shoulders.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!
By chris Posted: 7/16/2008 6:55am PDT
just making a stab in the dark.
By Guber Posted: 7/16/2008 6:49pm PDT
GM deserve everything coming to them. Remember Saturn's EV-1. They were ahead of game and blew it, by selling the technology to the "oilman". Greed not alway good.
Ford, well the Ford family is worth a feel hundred billions, let them bail themselves out.
Chrysler, privately held, why should we hand them our tax dollars so that they could paid there CEO 25 million dollars + whatever bonuses.
Better design and customer will come. Hired some europeans designer for....Godsake. Ford has "good car" but only for europeans. We get the left overs.
By chris Posted: 7/16/2008 7:56pm PDT
also, the ford family's fortunes lay purely in stock. With the downfall of firestone and the recent deflation of ford stock, the ford family has mortgaged everything they own (even the rights to the ford name) to get that company back into the game. They're all in.
Chrysler is going to get cut up because they're owned by a small group of people... not a cohesive family like ford, or a large investor base like GM. I've been saying it for years but chrysler is really screwed.
By Guber Posted: 7/16/2008 9:26pm PDT
Ford: didn't know that, good for them for doing so. Have owned 2 Fords (94 mustang gt, 93 Explorer) in the past, wouldn't hesitate to own Ford again.
Chrysler: only group worth keeping is, Jeep.
It be almost useless bailing these companies out, I'm almost assured once back on their feet, they'll be outsourcing more jobs out of this country to maximized profit and fattening their own pockets.
I just feel that we taxpayers shouldn't be bailing out every failed company that comes along.
By Guber Posted: 7/16/2008 9:36pm PDT
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!