
Carmakers unhappy with NHTSA eco-assessment of new CAFE regs
The difficulty facing the U.S. automotive industry with the recently-revised 31.6mpg by 2015 CAFE requirement is well-known, but no less pressing. The carmakers claim the costs to comply will be measured in the billions of dollars when they can least afford it, and now a draft NHTSA report on the environmental impact of the fuel economy improvement has stirred further animosity toward the agency.
According to the draft report, the proposed fuel economy increases would result in a global reduction of atmospheric CO2 by 0.2ppm by 2030 and prevent the emission of over 400,000 tons of CO2 each year by 2035.
Those conclusions, and others, have caused the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers to take issue with the assessment, calling it alternately 'illogical' and 'wholly inconsistent', reports
The Detroit News.
The Alliance believes the NHTSA's model is dramatically flawed, and seriously overestimates the impact the regulations could have on the global atmosphere.
The report itself is the product of a court-ordered investigation into the issue of the environmental impact of fuel economy regulations. Now the NHTSA is refusing to comment, since the report is only a draft, but the Alliance is speaking freely. Their primary point of contention with the NHTSA finding that the heightened fuel economy standars will reduce CO2 emissions lies in the difference between theory and real-world market effects.
By raising fuel economy standards, the automakers argue, the government is effectively raising car prices, which will cause consumers to hold onto older, more polluting vehicles, longer. That, in turn, will counter-act any savings from newer cars.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!
By Renton Posted: 8/22/2008 7:36am PDT
Won't somebody please think of the children?
By JSH Posted: 8/22/2008 8:20am PDT
The NHTSA has recently released CAFE numbers for 2008. Toyota's domestically produced cars fall only 2.8% short of reaching the 2015 goal of 35.7 mpg using no new technology. (Toyota's domestically built cars are the Avalon, Camry, Corolla, and Matrix)
Honda is only 1.4% short with their domestically built cars again with conventional cars. (Honda makes the Civic and the Accord in the US)
Bottom line, the regulation is easily to do and won't result in the generally public forced into tiny, unsafe cars. The industries argument holds no sway, especially when they use the same "sky is falling, it will cost $10,000 per vehicle" arguments every time they have been given a mandate. (Seat belts, airbags, original CAFE, crash testing, emission regs, etc)
By Renton Posted: 8/22/2008 12:16pm PDT
Why don't you go hang out on some hippie blog and leave this site to the cars guys.
I am all for efficiency and prefer to have the market drive car design rather than legislation. I am so sick of new regulations... every time you blink another pops up.
We need less gov't, not more
By Turkle Posted: 8/22/2008 8:53pm PDT
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!