By
Nelson Ireson
Nelson Ireson
Editor
BIO
Nelson is an Editor at High Gear Media focusing on reviewing cars and covering the hottest topics in luxury and performance cars, car culture, and...
More
LATEST ARTICLE
2013 Porsche 911 GT3 Spy Shots
Porsche's latest generation of the 911, the 991, has just recently made its way onto the scene...
Read More
- #3LEADERBOARD RANK
- 5424ARTICLES CONTRIBUTED
- 205COMMENTS POSTED

veyron crash motorauthority 1
Another Veyron has met a bitter and untimely end, this time at the hands of a driver apparently convinced the car was suitable for plowing a wheat field in West Berkshire, UK. The crumpled front end and left front quarter panel, undercarriage and collapsed windshield indicate this was more than a minor off-road excursion, marking the second documented Veyron crash.
The
first crash also involved the left front of the car and a UK driver. This second incident appears to have occurred under similar circumstances to the first. Caught in a series of photos posted at
GT Spirit, the crashed Veyron features an odd damage pattern. Though the car does not appear to have been rolled over, the damage to the windshield is significant, and appears to have come from the front or above the car. The portion of a tree stuck through the left headlight taken with the broken remnant in the foreground of another photo indicates the accident may have at least partly featured the tree in a key role as well.
Apart from the fact of the accident itself, little is known other than that the driver lost control on a long curve. Given the car's final orientation to the road, it may have simply come down to speed-induced understeer pushing the car onto the apron where it subsequently struck a number of roadside obstacles, including a hedgerow, a tree and the wheat field.
Second Veyron crashFirst Veyron crashVeyron driver attempts impromptu tractor impression
First Bugatti Veyron crash
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!
By luigi Posted: 9/2/2008 1:34pm PDT
the second is this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujYDjJEa2w0
By Nelson Posted: 9/2/2008 1:58pm PDT
Yes, that could be counted as the second, but it was really only a minor off. There was no major structural damage as the two accidents above demonstrate in the photos. That was the standard used in deciding to call the accident in the story the second.
By 94 taurus owner Posted: 9/2/2008 2:58pm PDT
By Z__ Posted: 9/2/2008 4:47pm PDT
A few hundred thousand euros(!) in bodywork and I'm sure it will be as good as new.
By HECTOR Posted: 9/2/2008 6:41pm PDT
By Gus Posted: 9/2/2008 8:11pm PDT
By nbsmatambo Posted: 9/2/2008 9:43pm PDT
By CCB Posted: 9/2/2008 10:01pm PDT
By Jason Posted: 9/3/2008 1:58am PDT
By saabfan Posted: 9/8/2008 2:02pm PDT
By dede Posted: 9/8/2008 6:00pm PDT
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!