2010 Porsche 911 Photo

2010 Porsche 911 - Review

 

2010 Porsche 911 Turbo

Of course, you wouldn't, and I wouldn't make those gross mistakes in the latest edition of the 911 Turbo, you because you're perfect, and me, because my rain-inducing powers completely snuffed out our track time. It turns out that rubber residue, plus oil and grease, plus rain, turns the track into a frictional coefficient no car company wants to explore deeply with a bunch of jetlagged drivers. Smart, very smart. Smarter would have been leaving me at home.

Still, our gaggle spent more than 200 miles blowing around greater Lisbon with the latest 911 Turbo-easily, Porsche's most advanced blown 911 ever and the most powerful "standard" Turbo, too. It may check in on paper as a lightweight in pure horsepower next to a 638-hp Chevy Corvette ZR1, but there's monstrous torque afoot, and a relatively lightweight body to haul around the lightly paved hammercurls and blind alleys they call streets here.

It's an astonishing, pure driving experience, despite the layers of technology added to cope with its copious power. And it's still distinctly a Porsche, from the way it lockstitches a seam along the proper driving line, to the narrow worldview you get between its trademark raised front fenders.

2010 Porsche 911 Turbo: Command performance

There's more familiar aural pleasure--and some dissonance--inside the 911 Turbo, all kinds of whooshes, clicks, whistles, booms and slams as you plumb into its throttle travel and push its needles deeply into their far reaches.

The basics sound evolutionary, but the 3.8-liter flat six in the 911 Turbo this year is a new engine, the first time the model's received its own dedicated, ground-up powerplant in its 35 years. It's up to the moment in history, and delivers 500 hp and 480 lb-ft of torque, up 20 hp from the previous edition. Credit goes to a new manifold, direct injection, and variable-vaned turbochargers. With the available Sport Chrono package, the torque rises through overboost to 516 lb-ft when pressed.


 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (11)
  1. That must have been fun.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. Grow a set of balls and design an all new car! Looks as well! For example Ferrari 458 Italia. It's crazy to think that a company with so much going for them can turn into a one trick pony. Yes it looks good, so does the lamborghini muira, or the Ferrari 355. Grow a set, and ditch the VW Beetle look, i'm bored. PASSION!!!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. Hey Marty - Next time you need to go to Europe to drive Porsches, give me a call and I'll bring the raincoats, umbrellas and galoshes!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. I just cannot get excited about a Porsche. I'm sure they are technically brilliant cars and wonderful performers, but they are so dammed boring to look at.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. Couldn't agree more with the comment about Porsches design, it looks pretty much unchanged throughout its various generations.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. As a Porsche owner I think it is great that the shape never changes! It's iconic and the old car never looks dated against the new, and so always retaining it's value when time comes for an upgrade. Also, it was never meant to be a car to pose in - it's a precision tool that puts a very very wide smile on your face everytime you drive it. If a person wants to look pretty and use it to stroke their ego...buy something else.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. I do agree that they should keep one model looking the same. Just because all the Porsche fans will get their arse out otherwise. But... you've got to agree that they need one all-new model, just one. To say, this is Porsche, not only are we technically brilliant, but we are also passionate about cars. Not just a bunch of geeks working in a shed. Astons are very similar, but they manage to ignite the fame of passion with every new design, even though it is loosly based on the same concept. Porsche don't do this, because the are all strictly based on the same design. Passion is about creativity and artistic flare, not just technical brilliance.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  8. As a not Porsche owner I think it is no matter that the shape never changes ! When I will got some Porshe maybe than it's will be matter .
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  9. Ok, whether or not you like the look, where do you come up with the whole "one look" thought process from? Have you not heard of, say, the Carerra (especially the Carerra GT?), Cayenne, or the Panamera??
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  10. i totaly agree with TEAL, this is the catch, porsche is not a japanese car that changes its platform each five years, porsche can not be compared to any automible on earth. it is an engineering marvel, and it is not meant to be sold to those who want a total face left each couple of years. i diagree with adrian to a great extend. porsche owners are those who appreciate static bueaty it is a dream car
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  11. Drove the Panamera turbo, what a beast. Handling, power, interior the best.
    Down side $155,000 w/o tax, no spare, no run flat tires. As many time as I have cut side walls on tires not having a spare does not make sense. Also drove the Panamera S. PDK kept hanging up in third gear plus the engine labored under acceleration, all for $122,000. Are both overpriced we'll see considering there is NO NEW TECHNOLOGY ITS ALL FROM THE CAYENNE.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!



 
© 2011 MotorAuthority. All Rights Reserved. MotorAuthority is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.