Advertisement
2009 Acura RDX Photo

2009 Acura RDX - Review

 

by Nelson Ireson

The compact sport luxury SUV niche was not so long ago a non-existent thing, though recent years have seen an increasing number of entrants, including German, Japanese and American offerings. The next several years will see even more added as Mercedes brings its GLK to the mix and Audi rolls out the Q5. With so many cars vying for a relatively small portion of overall sales, the competition is fierce, and small weaknesses can be magnified. It’s a case of automotive survival of the fittest.

So can the RDX hold its own in the increasingly intense sub-genre it has chosen for itself? Or will its flaws render it incapable of survival in the harsh automotive and economic conditions of the oil-crunch marketplace?

At almost the same size as a mid-size hatchback - parked side-by-side, one would need a tape measure to distinguish it significantly from a Mazda3, for example, except in height - the RDX isn’t packing a whole lot of cargo space into its repertoire. Neither is it a roomy enclave ready to accommodate four six-footers - though it’ll haul four average-sized people and their gear around with ease. And despite the 2.3L displacement and four-cylinder engine, the variable-flow turbo adds enough punch to make driving it a lot of fun.

Unfortunately, this is where the complications start, at least for those that took interest in the RDX because of its happy marriage of sport-sedan handling and small SUV space. In reality, it’s more of a combination of small SUV handling and sport-sedan space, which, as you may notice, isn’t the best of both worlds.



The engine isn’t as potent as you’d expect from a 240hp (179kW), 260lb-ft (350Nm) 2.3L turbo, especially if you’ve been exposed to the brilliant powerplant of the same displacement and configuration huddling inside Mazda’s hotted-up Mazdaspeed3, and once you start putting foot to floor, the battle isn’t nearly as close as a spec sheet might lead you to believe. The RDX’s rather portly 3,900lb (1,770kg) curb weight certainly contributes to that sensation, as well as the poor fuel mileage, achieving 13-15mpg (15.6-18L/100km) in normal driving in town, 19-21mpg (11.2-12.4L/100km) on the highway - both of those numbers can go even further down if you get caught up in listening to the turbo spool. Those are not the efficiency figures of a sport sedan, but you’d know that from reading the EPA estimates of 17mpg (13.8L/100km) city and 22mpg (10.7L/100km) highway on the window sticker.

Other journalists have opined that the vehicle handles like a sports sedan, and I agree. It drives like a sports sedan or hatchback - that’s been lifted six inches. That’s not a good thing, however. The omnipresent rollover warnings, including one particularly worrying note on the driver’s sun-visor discourage truly vigorous driving. Attacking a twisty tree-lined highway or canyon road is right out, as is essentially anything that requires quick transitional responses, as the car’s higher stance overcomes the stiff springing and firm damping when rapidly changing direction, rendering a tippy, not-so-stable feel. Heed the warnings. They are there for a reason.

Nevertheless, the RDX can be fun to drive. Broad sweepers and the occasional moderately-paced tight corner are treats, handled with relative ease by sport sedan standards and with athletic aplomb by almost any SUV’s measure.

Turbo lag is noticeable, and kills off-the-line acceleration until about 3,000rpm when driving in automatic mode. Once it spools, the power surge makes for jerky driving, which you have to compensate for with your foot, especially if it hits mid-turn. Passengers likely will not appreciate the driver’s hoot and the further acceleration that follows, either. The standard-equipment paddle-shifted automatic is actually quite fun if used in sport mode, though the tippy feeling and all the warning signs combine to really make for an uneasy feeling about pushing it, and therefore actually taking advantage of the shifter paddles for anything but straight-line acceleration. Self-shifting does help alleviate some of the boost lag problems at launch, however.



The Super-Handling all-wheel drive system (SH-AWD) definitely improves cornering, making low-to-moderate speed maneuvers feel ‘flatter’ than they would otherwise, but not more confidence inspiring if you’re used to being fully in control of the car (i.e. completely free of traction and stability control) as it’s obvious something unnatural is going on. When it kicks in, it sends extra torque to the outside rear wheel, giving a feeling that the seat-of-the-pants sensor interprets as ‘slewing’ or ‘yawing’ around corners at first, though that is a feeling that’s fairly easy to grow accustomed to. It’s also easy to understand why Acura feels the system is a suitable replacement for all-wheel steering systems.

The interior will be considered a bit too flashy and bright for some tastes, especially considering the relatively poor tactile quality of several primary pieces, though it is certainly comfortable to inhabit. Silvery plastic pieces make no serious attempt at appearing like aluminum, and their feel would quickly betray the truth if they did. The sheer quantity of silver-colored trim in the cockpit is staggering, and inexplicable, especially when the rest of the materials are so good. The leather feels soft and durable, the remainder of the plastics are solid and impressive, and the eminently ergonomic steering wheel is probably among the best designs in road cars today, at least in terms of size and shape.

Like so many other strong points of the RDX, however, it has a dark side. In a contest with the average Formula 1 steering wheel to see which has the most buttons, the RDX would lose, but only just. Likewise, the center console area, which houses a brilliant sound system and a very good nav system is undermined by small buttons in illogical locations and a counter-intuitive interface. For example, the tiny black strip at the top of the center stack isn’t a decorative feature - it’s the odd and nearly invisible location for the audio and climate control displays.

It’s a shame there’s not more available in the DVD audio music format, because the demo disc that comes with the car proves it’s not just a gimmick. It’s like having a band in the car. Even in non-DVD audio mode, the stereo sounds excellent, filling the whole vehicle with even, balanced sound. The whole technology package in the car is suitably impressive, and despite the small buttons and displays that easily wash out in bright sunlight, it’s a very fun and entertaining environment.



Despite the difficult controls, the navigation provides thorough and accurate information that’s easy to read when the sun isn’t interfering. The live traffic reporting feature is a highlight of the system, but the reviewer’s home area wasn’t within the unit’s coverage, so we’ll have to withhold judgment of this element until a later date.

One of the most underreported features of the Acura RDX is its proliferation of innovative, or at least handy, storage areas, such as the use made of the large door armrest. The center console bin, for example, could hold a mid-sized dog or even a very small child. OK, maybe not quite (and we certainly don’t recommend it), but it’s big, and it’s divisible into several configurations thanks to a handy tray system located at the vertical mid-point. Cupholders are well-sized, if somewhat awkwardly placed on the far side of the center tunnel from the driver.

Headroom is pretty good, even for a six-foot-plus driver or passenger, and legroom is acceptable for tall folks - probably ample for the more average-sized. The fully adjustable seat and steering wheel allow for the driver to customize the seating position at will, even accommodating tall drivers that must sit a long way back from the pedals and don’t want to be constantly reaching forward for the wheel. Room in the rear is better than it could be, and better than most hatchbacks or small SUVs of the same size. Room in the cargo area is a bit scarce, however, even with the seats down, because they don’t lie at a significant angle, rather than folding flat.

Road and cabin noise don’t make themselves known any more than is appropriate, even at brisk highway speeds, and the car is a comfortable ride on smooth pavement. The ‘whoosh’ of the turbo will likely prove appealing, even addicting, to some and a turnoff for others. It’s not intrusive, but it is noticeable. Turn up the DVD audio, however, and it melts into the background. The stiff springing and firm damping - designed to resist rollover, but only so effective - make for a choppier ride than you’d expect over rough or broken surfaces. Speed bumps are nightmares.

Off-road use will be limited, thanks to less-than-stellar clearance, not that the vehicle is likely to see more than dirt or gravel roads anyway - the AWD system is meant to improve handling, not make it a mountain goat, after all, and it’s effective at that.



Though a few angles make it look a bit odd, especially anything low that catches the oddly-upswept front end in profile, the RDX presents a handsome overall image. It will probably win a lot of fans that simply aren’t turned on by the staid Germans. Infiniti’s FX line of sport-compact SUVs, however, offer a seductive alternative, and Mercedes’ GLK shares some of the fashionable look of the RDX, though with a very European flair.

Pricing is relatively good for its class, starting at $33,695 for the base model or $36,695 equipped with the technology package, like the test vehicle, but many looking for a bit more sport while maintaining 99% of the utility of this compact SUV would be better served by a punchy hatch like the Impreza WRX or Mazdaspeed3. Neither offers the level of luxury specification, and the cars that offer both the luxury and the sport are considerably more expensive, for the most part, so the Acura RDX does offer a unique package at a competitive pricepoint. Toss in the (mostly) good looks and the RDX is a contender in the tough compact sport SUV class.
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (7)
  1. The 1st thing that struck me about the RDX was that some of the interior materials were cheap - even compared to the RDX. Otherwise, a very nice vehicle & if this niche market picks up I can see it selling better once the diesel/hyrid hits.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. Honda has diesel and hybrid cars coming, but no diesel-hybrid as of yet.

    Look for hybrids in the small cars and diesel in the big ones. This car is in the middle.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. A few days ago there was mention of a possibly RDX hybrid:
    http://www.motorauthority.com/cars/acura/acura-to-launch-all-new-model-in-2010-nsx-replacement-to-follow/
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. this review is an absolute JOKE. MAZDA 3...WHAT? Instead of a tape measure, one would need a brain in order to draw a similarity.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. Actually, rdxER, the Mazda3 and RDX are within a handful of inches (or less) in every important dimension, excepting height, and that was the only comparison made. In fact, I even pointed out that the Mazda3/Mazdaspeed3 doesn't offer the same level of luxury specification as the RDX...just that it offers almost all the utility and far more sport, if that's what you're looking for.

    Perhaps the analytical capability of a person that can't see the obvious similarity is what should be called into question here, rather than the already noted disparity between the two models.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. there are some misinformed and inaccurate points made in this article.

    -comparing a fwd 3200lb econo 5-door hatchback with 260/280 to an awd 3900lb luxo suv with 240/260? and expecting similar performance?

    -the rollover warnings are present on all suv's...or at least any suv where the manufacturer thought it was wise to print that out. unless you are muscling the car around and jerking the wheel, it will handle transitional turns with ease...modulation of the throttle and understanding how the sh-awd works will also help with the stability.

    -putting the transmission in sport mode in no way helps with off the line boost onset.

    -sh-awd in no way helps the car feel "flatter"

    -you can turn off stability and traction control by pushing the "VSA off" button. this does wonders for spirited driving.

    -during all of my spirited driving in my RDX, not once have i felt sh-awd "kick in." i think you are feeling the VSA kick in...which, like i said, turn it off and it will do wonders to improve the driving experience.

    -the "tiny black strip at the top of the center stack" is an awesome feature that gives you all of the relevant radio and climate control information right under the windshield. this helps you keep your eyes on the road more. combine that with the audio controls on the steering wheel and your attention is on the road way more often than in a car without these features.

    the rest- good and bad, is pretty spot on, though.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. Happasaiyan -

    I appreciate your concern for keeping us honest, but I think you confuse opinion with fact. The comparison to the Mazdaspeed3 was made on the basis of showing what is possible with a vehicle of nearly identical dimensions - except for height - and displacement. People who want sport and utility are better served with that vehicle, though as you note, the luxury element isn't equivalent. But it wasn't compared on that basis.

    And yes, rollover warnings are present on nearly all tall vehicles. Which serves as ample reason not to consider them sporty. Avoid sudden maneuvers or excessive speeds? In a sport-oriented vehicle? The definition of antithetical.

    Putting the transmission in sport mode directly helps off-the-line boost onset by improving throttle responsiveness and enabling the vehicle to hold a gear for a greater duration. That gets the RDX in full boost quicker and keeps it there longer than a delayed-response throttle and a short shift, as provided by the standard transmission mode.

    The SH-AWD does, in fact, create a perception of flatter cornering, as I said in the article. It increases the rotational rate of the car for a given steering input by directing the drive to the outside rear wheel. That is why Acura feels the SH-AWD system supplants any need for a four-wheel active steering system. It does not cause the car to actually corner flatter - but that's not what I said.

    Turning off the stability control in a vehicle already prone to rollovers and not intended for sudden maneuvers or excessive speed is a recipe for disaster when driving in a spirited manner. In an actual sports car or hot hatch, I'd agree with you. But in a high roll-center SUV, you need all the help you can get. It's there for a reason. Use it. As regards the SH-AWD, you can in fact feel it distributing power around the chassis if you have a deft touch. You don't even need to be driving hard to feel it in action if you are familiar with the traits of FWD vs. RWD handling, because the RDX changes from one to the other mid-turn. It's obvious if you know what you're looking for. The stability control will only take action when it senses wheel slip or two wheels traveling at grossly different rotational velocities, or under a few other circumstances, but it's clear when it 'kicks in' as it cuts power or makes other gross adjustments. It is not a subtle sensation.

    I'm glad you like the tiny black strip that suffices for an interface, but I found it to be hard to read, far from the controls it relates to and it's still too far to the right and below the driver's line of sight to 'keep your eyes on the road'.

    None of this is to say I think the RDX is a bad vehicle. I just think the way it is marketed - as a sporty crossover or compact SUV with pretensions to performance - is somewhat disingenuous, and those interested in such a vehicle can find equally useful alternatives with much more capability, though they will have to sacrifice a little luxury to get it.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Advertisement

Advertisement

 
© 2013 MotorAuthority. All Rights Reserved. MotorAuthority is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.