EU to mandate daytime running lights

Posted on Monday 11 February 2008

image38744_c.jpg

The European Union plans to make daytime running lamps mandatory on new cars from 2011, and on trucks and buses one and a half years later, according to a report from a German newspaper. The British government is also supporting the move as a way to help increase road safety.

British road safety minister Jim Fitzpatrick has been quoted as saying “the UK has been successful in arguing against the introduction of mandatory use of dipped headlamps during daylight hours by drivers of existing vehicles. However, from early 2011 all new types of passenger cars and light vans will have to be fitted with dedicated daytime running lamps in accordance with the relevant European directive. By summer 2012, all new vehicles will have to be so fitted.”

The use of daytime running lights can lead to fuel efficiency losses but this is being reduced greatly by the increasing number of cars using LEDs for this function. Still, it’s expected that their use contributes to an increase in fuel consumption of 0.5%-1%.

Around 50% of member nations in the EU already require daytime lights, but the EU eventually wants this type of legislation rolled out in every country.

Related Posts

12 Comments for 'EU to mandate daytime running lights'

  1.  
    chris
    February 11, 2008 | 10:47 am
     

    again, as a younger Canadian who has lived with this kind of legislation all his life, I really don’t get what all the fuss is about.

    the technology costs PENNIES if anything at all, and like it’s said, you don’t exactly notice a drop in available power when you turn your headlamps on. so whats the argument?

  2.  
    Alex
    February 11, 2008 | 11:12 am
     

    Who the hell care?

  3.  
    Mike
    February 11, 2008 | 12:59 pm
     

    I don’t understand all the fuss. In Canada DRLs have been mandatory for almost 20 years. And I would say they are a great safety feature. Even on a clear day, you can see oncoming traffic from a much further distance.

  4.  
    James
    February 11, 2008 | 2:56 pm
     

    I absolutely support this legislation. I live in Latvia, where the same way as it is in the rest of Baltic states and all of Northern Europe, lights are mandatory 24/7. This law was introduced many years ago and I still remember that there was some public resistance. But now no one would question the safety benefit of this. I always feel strange and less safe when I travel with car in countries where drivers don’t use lights during daytime.

  5.  
    chris
    February 11, 2008 | 3:26 pm
     

    james; i live close to the boarder with the USA and drive there frequently; i know exactly what you mean.

  6.  
    ST
    February 11, 2008 | 3:42 pm
     

    Sure DRL are fine… when not many people have them and that’s when people notice them. But when everyone has them, it’s like they aren’t on at all. Why not start painting the cars in only florescent yellow and orange. Benefits…well, put it this way, I won’t notice surrounding cars better than I already do. It’s called looking around as opposed to relying on some bright object in your peripheral vision. Then again, govt hand out drivers’ licenses like it was going out of fashion.

  7.  
    HECTOR
    February 11, 2008 | 7:01 pm
     

    I see that I am outnumbered here but…

    DRLs are the evil brainchild of some retarded bastard/s. Far from being a safety tool they are highly dangerous to pedestrians and motorcyclists. There’s absolutely zero convincing and proven evidence that they prevent accidents but then again logic tells me this without the need for fake studies.

    But, by all means, shine braight high beam headlights in my eyes. It’s not like I need my corneas or anything.

    PS - if it’s dark where you live… why don’t you try turning on the lights for yourself? I live in a place where it’s sunny about 90% of the year. Why must you force your lights on me? Next up: windshield wipers that are constantly on. After all, it rains a lot in Hawaii so let’s force all cars to have nonstop windshield wipers, even if they’re sold in the Mohave desert.

  8.  
    Jason
    February 12, 2008 | 12:49 am
     

    DRLs are a wonderful idea, and the NHTSA should mandate them in the USA. They’re less powerful than headlights, but improve visibility at all hours. The biggest advantage, though, is that it provides me some warning when bloody morons go driving around hours after sunset with *no lights on at all*. This seems to happen to me every few weeks, and several times it has been dangerous; if there aren’t many streetlights, it’s hard to tell that a car is there at all. At least with DRLs you would see some light as it approaches, even if the person is too irretrievably stupid to turn on their headlights properly.

  9.  
    Duane Barber
    February 29, 2008 | 7:16 pm
     

    I am amazed that none of the comments address the very real issue that the driving population is aging. With aging (40 plus) there are astigimatism / cataract replacement and CME conditions that are normally not an issue until the eye is forced to look at many cars in oncoming traffic all with various colors and angles of light. i.e. drivers are momentarily blinded during the day and the eye can feel real pain at night with the Xenon daytime lights yet on. The DRLs are nothing more than a fashion statement that is very dangerous to other drivers. Should some with common sense may want to put yellow markers below the.bumper at the corners and that may be helpfull. DRLs are amlost as usefull as the sun visor stickers that tell Americans the airbags do not work. Jason should realize that the automatic nightime lights are standard on most cars and turn on the tail lights also. His observation is not complete as The DRLs do not turn on the tail lights.

  10.  
    Richard
    March 13, 2008 | 10:37 am
     

    Please note that GM convinced the US Government to let it use half powered high beams as DRL’s. This has caused a flod of complaints about glare. These complaints are well founded. Canada has adopted the US requirements in this regard. The EU does not permit high beams for use as DRL’s.

  11.  
    John Cargill
    June 10, 2008 | 4:45 pm
     

    I really support DRL use. I have them in my GM products and I really think they aid in driving because you can see them in front and behind you. Ford and Chrysler are to cheap to install them. I am trying to figure out how to turn them on in my 2006 Dodge Grand Caravan SXT. So far it has been a struggle. I anyone knows how, let me know. It will make the vehicle much safer.

  12.  
    Raymond
    July 25, 2008 | 1:26 am
     

    im all for day time running lights and i cant wait for the day that the USA steps up to bat and requires them on all cars. my 1997 dodge grand caravan does not have them but i turn on my head lights everytime i start the engine. TO John Cargill: take your 2006 caravan SXT to your local dodge dealer and find out if your mini van in canadian made. if so and your DRLs are not working its just a simple hook up to the vans computer to turn them on. should cost less the $40.00 to do the job. i belive DRLs are a wonderful accident saveing device and it makes all cars much more visable in most if not all conditions.

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)


Information for comment users
Line and paragraph breaks are implemented automatically. Your e-mail address is never displayed. Please consider what you're posting.

Use the buttons below to customise your comment.


RSS feed for comments on this post | TrackBack URI

 


Close
E-mail It