Advertisement

Mercedes' New 5.5-liter V-8 To Replace 6.2 In Next C-Class AMG?

 
Follow Nelson

2012 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG Coupe

Just this morning Mercedes-Benz graced us with more details on the naturally-aspirated 5.5-liter AMG V-8 put to use in the 2012 SLK55 AMG, but already rumors about the next car to get its glory have sprouted.

The car tipped as the 5.5's beneficiary? The next C-Class AMG. Having put the latest C63 AMG to the test on the track and over some of the best roads in Spain, we know just how good the "old" 6.2-liter powerhouse is. Why mess with success?

Precisely because the 5.5-liter AMG (M152) engine is new and the 6.2-liter (M156) engine is old. It's time for a changing of the guard, as it were. But is the new non-turbo 5.5 up to the task?

Not right now, but it might be. In current tune, the 5.5-liter V-8 generates 422 horsepower and 398 pound-feet of torque as used in the new SLK55 AMG. That's well short of the base 451 horsepower from the current C63 AMG, not to mention the 481-horsepower Performance Package trim. But there may yet be some headroom in the 5.5.

Ford, for instance, gets 412 horsepower out of a mere 5.0-liter V-8, and the Blue Oval doesn't have as much overhead built into its prices to afford more exotic materials in the valves, pistons, connecting rods, and crankshaft as Mercedes/AMG does. So it's easily within the realm of possibility that the new M152 could be tuned up to something in the neighborhood of 450 horsepower.

But beyond that, we should consider what the next-gen C-Class is likely to be like. With emissions and fuel economy regulations around the world growing ever stricter, the next C-Class has a decent shot at being somewhat lighter than the current car. With close to the same output as the current C63 AMG housed in a lighter chassis, finding the M152 in the next C-Class AMG might not be something to moan about after all.

[Car and Driver]



Advertisement
 
 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (2)
  1. Audi screwed up! Should have built in U.S. and helped rebuild our manufacturing economy and put people back to work. Think of the positive PR spinoff that could have been generated and the positive marketing themes that could have been used to generate U.S. sales. The move was/is a blatant blunder that expresses AUDI's unconscionable decision to put profit about social responsibility. Sure, manufacturing in the U.S. could make the product more expensive, but not any more so than Mercedes built in Alabama. VW, Mercedes, BMW are building cars in the U.S. and profiting. Why couldn't Audi?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. makes sense. Merc will release this version of the 5.5l in the C. Tune it for the E and add a single turbo/supercharcher, and then slap a couple of turbos on it for the S.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Follow Us

Advertisement

Take Us With You!

 
Advertisement
Advertisement

Research New Cars

Go!


 
© 2014 MotorAuthority. All Rights Reserved. MotorAuthority is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.