Advertisement

Robot Driving: First Pikes Peak, Next Nevada, Then Your Town?

Follow George

Google autonomous Toyota Prius test vehicle

Google autonomous Toyota Prius test vehicle

Enlarge Photo

Recently Google requested a waiver from lawmakers in Nevada to allow it to test its computer-driven cars on Nevada public roads. Could robotic cars be safe on everyday roads?

In the last couple of years, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has finally seen driverless cars fully master their demanding tests of remote and even simulated city driving.

Last year, an Audi TTS challenged the incredibly demanding Pikes' Peak hill climb (12.4 miles with 156 turns) without any driver. The robotized Audi mastered the grueling climb in 27 minutes.

Though 17 minutes behind the top racers on the hill, this was still as fast as most drivers would ever hope to get up the mountain.


Stanford/Audi TTS autonomous Pikes Peak car, aka 'Shelley'

Stanford/Audi TTS autonomous Pikes Peak car, aka 'Shelley'

Enlarge Photo

By late 2010, Google scientists had developed the technology for autonomous vehicles to the degree to begin testing on public roads in the area around Palo Alto, California.

These early test cars always had a human backup ready to take control of the car, but the test fleet accumulated thousands of miles with no accidents attributed to computer failures.

The Google program is headed by Sebastian Thrun, who had been director of the Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.

Thrun also led the Stanford team that won the second DARPA driverless car challenge and a $2 million prize, for creating a vehicle that could complete a 132-mile desert course without human intervention.

The proposal presented to the Nevada lawmakers extends this research to test on public roads this kind of automated driving systems.

Stanford/Audi TTS autonomous Pikes Peak car, aka 'Shelley'

Stanford/Audi TTS autonomous Pikes Peak car, aka 'Shelley'

Enlarge Photo

Of course, a car that drives itself would take away the "fun" factor for the driver, but it would reduce stress in harried commuter traffic and offer the opportunity to actually get work done during the commute.

Distracted drivers cause many vehicular accidents as they talk on their cell phones, send text messages, change CDs, or even just get into heated discussions with a passenger.

The robotic car might be subject to its own potential failures, to be sure.

But would they be more frequent or more dangerous than the carnage we now experience with human drivers?

Leave us your thoughts in the Comments below.

Advertisement
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (3)
  1. i like the idea, as long as the driver has the ability to override - much like the cruise control of today.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. iRobot audi comes to mind
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. If driver had the ultimate control to override, I can see this being a helpful tool to any vehicle. This could lower DUIs from happening as often. States will have to get creative to make up for the loss of revue but people would safer, so there are positives to this.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement

Take Us With You!

 
Advertisement
Advertisement

Research New Cars

Go!

Related Used Listings

Browse used listings in your area.


 
© 2014 MotorAuthority. All Rights Reserved. MotorAuthority is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by izmo, Inc. Send us feedback.