Advertisement

Driven: 2011 Cadillac CTS-V Wagon

Follow Nelson

Press launches are odd things, especially when you're dealing with a 556-horsepower super-wagon on a track you've never driven before. Limited time, restricted driving conditions, and unfamiliarity can conspire to put more noise in the signal you're getting from the car than you can filter out. But the 2011 Cadillac CTS-V Wagon rises above the static to deliver one clear message: this wagon is serious.

Serious about performance despite also being serious about luxury accomodations and a quiet, composed cabin. Serious about value despite offering a standard Bose 5.1 surround sound system, heated leather seats, 40-gigabyte nav, and magneto-rheological active dampers. Serious about style though it can haul the kids and the groceries better than any sedan.

If you've read about the rest of the CTS-V lineup, you know what to expect of the Wagon: its stats are the same, or nearly so, from power to weight to performance. Boring, you might think, then, to drive yet another iteration of a familiar car. On the contrary. It's incredibly exciting to drive a wagon with almost identical performance to what is one of the world's fastest production sedans around the Nurburgring (the $132,000 Porsche Panamera Turbo has since taken the title by about three seconds). And an American wagon at that.



On The Track

Power on demand, ample torque in nearly any gear, an ability to slide the tail at will but a willingness to remain neutral and compliant at the limit even with all the electronic nannies turned off, the 2011 Cadillac CTS-V Wagon is, simply put, a brilliant performance car. We prefer the six-speed manual, but the automatic transmission is fun and engaging, though it displays a slightly annoying tendency to hesitate on near-redline upshifts. The 4,390-lb curb weight impacts braking and transitional performance, meaning you'll have to plan ahead when seriously moving, but the computer-controlled magnetic dampers help, anticipating your every move, reacting to driver inputs, surface changes, and its own known limits to make the car do almost exactly what you want.

I say almost, because toward the upper limits of the car's range, particularly with the electronic aids still engaged, the V-wagon does show some tuned-in limitations. Rather than holding the outside rear full stiff in a fast corner, for instance, the damper will soften and let the car roll a bit more. Whether it's to prevent oversteer or induce understeer, the effect is the same: an artifical cap on the car's capability, put there to keep over-eager drivers from getting bitten by the massive teeth of the car's power and torque.

Almost, as well, because of the steering. As we've noted in nearly every CTS or CTS-V review thus far, the car's steering is a bit numb. Vague on-center feel, slightly over-boosted off-center at medium speeds, and generally without the feedback and feel you'd really like to extract the most from the car. But then you remember this is also a luxury wagon in addition to a monstrous performer, and the compromise makes sense, even if the more hardcore would prefer the balanced tipped the other direction.

Nonetheless, you can see from the video that the car would have turned something in the upper 1:40s or lower 1:50s for a full lap around Laguna Seca even in our hacky, eight-laps-experience at Laguna journalistic hands--and even with having to soft-pedal it between turns 5 and 6, a key uphill acceleration point, to keep from running afoul of the very restrictive track sound limits.


Advertisement
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (3)
  1. meh...get a fully beefed Commodore/HSV Sportwagon using the same LS engine and you will find a better all round car and much much cheaper. for those wonderign it is the sport wagon version of the now defunct Nth american G8
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. This is what is WRONG with Cadillac in particular and GM in General. "Avoid the major pitfall of the regular CTS range. . . " The crappy seats! WHY is ANY car in this price range fitted with such poor seats that you need to buy a more expensive car and then pony up $3400 for the optional seats! This is freaking ridiculous! This is the reason that people have flocked away from GM cars and will continue to do so! Typical GM product planning, some bean counter said that they had to save money somewhere, so they saved a few bucks with some seats from an old Chevy Vega? WHY, for Gods sake, do you build a great car , then put the driver in a sub par seat? And I am a GM guy, so it pains me to write this! Go figure!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. I agree with Mazdaspeed in that why on earth does one need to purchase SEAT upgrades for a $67K station wagon? Also caught the piece about it wallowing about and the rear end kicking out in a slalom, perhaps to avoid over-steer. This thing is a South Beach soccer moms set of wheels or perhaps some hedge fund manager headed to the golf course!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement

Take Us With You!

 

Get FREE Dealer Quotes

From dealers near you
Go!
Advertisement

Research New Cars

Go!

Related Used Listings

Browse used listings in your area.

 
© 2014 MotorAuthority. All Rights Reserved. MotorAuthority is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by izmo, Inc. Send us feedback.