It’s great to see how far the BMW M3 has come. While the original 1986 had a high-strung four-cylinder, and the bare essentials, the latest 2010 has a powerful V-8 and serious luxury credentials. However, the latest M3s have also gained nearly half-a-ton in weight compared to the first cars, so while power and luxury might be up, the older car could have a better fun-to-drive feel.
Apparently Inside Line and contributor Allistar Weaver think that it’s a good idea to take an original 1986 model and comparing it to the latest 2010 M3. So how does a car nearly 25 years old compared to a factory fresh example?
The interiors of the cars contrast each other immensely. The 1986 BMW is equipped with no air conditioning or radio, with only has a weird LCD trip computer and slightly bolstered seats. The 2010 coupe is full of electronic gizmos that had the Weaver craving the simplicity of the ‘80s.
Driving wise, they find the old M3 a good driving car, with good combination of ride comfort and handling. Weaver finds the steering quick and the clutch and transmission operating lightly. Though thankfully the writer is aware that the 215 hp engine and its 0-60 time in 6.7 second 0-60 time isn’t quick by today’s standards, but good for its day. Overall, the 1986 BMW involves the driver more thanks to a great chassis, driving dynamics, and no huge power outputs that requires less technique.
The 2010 M3 makes up for the lack of power in the older car. Weaver loves the 4.4L V-8 and the thunderous acceleration that it provides. The steering feel in this 2010 car is even better than the one in the 1986 model. However, where the classic car took the bumps on the road with ease, the new M3’s suspension translates all the road surface irregularities to the driver.
Weaver points that while spanning 25 years of existence, both cars are great examples of M-cars of their times.
[Source: Inside Line]
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!