
2011 Chevrolet Volt
So the 2011 Chevy Volt might not sound like much of a performance or luxury car, but priced at $41,000 it's well into luxury-car territory. And if you think about it, the premium paid for the high-tech extended-range EV buys you the luxury of being an early adopter of high-tech automotive progress. But the question raised by the price announced today is: is it worth it?
Compared to the Nissan LEAF electric vehicle, the 2011 Volt costs about $8,200 more--before government rebates. The LEAF has an advantage there, too, as being a pure electric vehicle, it's eligible for state and local rebates the Volt doesn't qualify for, and both get the bounty of the $7,500 U.S. federal tax credit. With all things tallied up, that brings pricing down to $33,500 for the Volt and $25,280 for the LEAF. If you live in California or Georgia, however, the LEAF will save you another $5,000 in taxes, and Oregon will credit your return $1,500. That could drive the price as low as $20,280 for the LEAF.
But the 2011 Volt, while an electric vehicle, isn't limited to the <100-mile range of the LEAF. Sure, it only does 40 miles on pure electricity, but thanks to the on-board range-extending generator, it can go another 300 miles without a recharge. The LEAF would require several long stops for more electrons over that distance.
So, back to the question: is the Volt worth an $8,000-$13,000 premium over the pure-electric LEAF? That's a tough one, and depends largely on your driving habits, as well as whether your first EV will be a primary vehicle or a city-only commuter. If you need to take road trips and can only own one car, the Volt is the only choice between the two. If you think you'll be staying within the 40-mile all-electric range of the Volt anyway, however, the cheaper LEAF may suit you even better. Ultimately, the answer comes down to you, though having the flexibility of the Volt might provide some peace of mind.
For a deeper look at each car and more comparative analysis on the Volt-versus-LEAF debate, check out John Voelcker's article at our sister site, GreenCarReports.
[GM, GreenCarReports]
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!
By Roy Posted: 7/27/2010 6:18pm PDT
Chevy knows this. They reckon they're only going to sell 10,000 in the first 6 months. That's not going to drive the future of GM. They've made a big fuss about an over-priced (and probably under-engineered) car. I think they'll kill it quickly and go back to making gas guzzlers.
That's a shame because even Toyota didn't nail the Prius in the first generation. They stuck with it and came out with a niche-defining product that eventually paid huge dividends.
So disappointed.
By CamaroFan Posted: 7/27/2010 9:04pm PDT
By jay Posted: 7/28/2010 6:42am PDT
How come the Volt a mid-size sedan is too expensive at $41k but hte Leaf, a compact, is ok at @33k. There are comapacts out there for under 20k. How come no one is saying the Leaf is too expensive and probably under-engineered. Seems to me, Nissan took the easy way out.. Gm thought it through and are offering people a car that doesn't need sacrifices.
By furnace maintenance Posted: 7/28/2010 7:22am PDT
By Geoge Posted: 7/28/2010 8:40am PDT
By Roy Posted: 7/28/2010 5:43pm PDT
To address the Leaf (which I didn't do earlier), the article makes it pretty clear that the tax breaks make it much cheaper, especially in some states. In CA, where so many of the cache-conscious reside, it'll be over 10k cheaper and have 2.5 times the electric range.
If Chevy wants this to be a success it needs to sell these at a loss, as Toyota and Honda did with the first gen hybrids. Otherwise, they'll be forced to cut costs later, which will damage resale values and hurt *all* of Chevy's products.
Still disappointed, but hoping to be proved wrong.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!