2011 Mercedes-Benz S63 AMG Keeps The Name, Goes 5.5-liter Turbo

 
Follow Nelson

Mercedes-Benz S63 AMG Showcar

Mercedes-Benz S63 AMG Showcar

Enlarge Photo

Mercedes-Benz's latest line of 6.3-badged cars--the S63 among them--are actually powered by 6.2-liter engines, so perhaps it's not surprising that Mercedes is planning to keep the '63' naming convention despite replacing the engine with a new turbocharged 5.5-liter V-8.

The new M157 5.5-liter turbo V-8 beats the 6.2-liter engine's output with 536 horsepower and 590 pound-feet of torque, all while yielding 25 percent better fuel economy, so it will only be hardcore nomenclaturists that bother complaining over the badging. Just think of it as Lexus-like (or BMW-like) badging to match the "virtual" displacement of the car. Despite the less-thirsty attitude, the big sedan is expected to shoot to 60 mph in 4.4-4.5 seconds.

Thanks to its turbocharged power, the new S63's torque curve will be flat from 2,100 rpm through to 4,600 rpm, meaning punchy mid-range acceleration. For those that prefer a bit more bite, the performance package narrows down the peak torque plateau to 2,400-3,600 rpm while providing 563 horsepower and 664 pound-feet of torque.

A new version of Mercedes' MCT 7-speed automatic transmission will get the nod for the new 2011 S63, with the revisions focused primarily on fuel savings.

The 2011 Mercedes-Benz S63 will make its debut in the third quarter of the year, with the M157 engine spreading to the other '63'-badged cars through the end of 2010 and beginning of 2011.

[via Automobile]





 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (2)
  1. I really hate the way BMW and Mercedes have gotten away from a clear model nomenclature based on engine displacement...
    ...badging a Mercedes "63" is utterly pointless if the engine isn't a 6.3L - Might as well call it LeSabre or Polara.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. Love the engine power and much as I hate saying it, the fuel effiency, but I agree with bepsf, what is up with stupidly naming it as S63 without the engine.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Connect with Facebook

Motor Authority. Now with your friends.

Discover stories your friends read.
Share stories more easily.
You control what you share.
Learn more

Research New Cars

Go!


 
© 2011 MotorAuthority. All Rights Reserved. MotorAuthority is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.