Editor's note: High Gear Media wants you to write for us--just like Kinder Essington has done here. Here's what happens when you do--you get published alongside the pros, if your post is smart, well-written, and has a unique spin on luxury and performance vehicles. Want to be our next contributor? Check us out, sign up, and join us on more than 40 sites in the auto world's fast lane.
------------------------------
It's a sad irony that one of the most unconventional auto brands had to meet its end in the dullest of conventional ways.
It was 1944. World War II had a ways to go, but the industrious folks in Sweden figured they should have another car company. At least the people at Saab did.
Saab was founded in 1935 to provide Sweden with its own aircraft company. Fortunately for them, WW II came along and provided plenty of orders for war planes. (Sweden, an officially neutral nation, has a thriving arms production industry making planes, tanks and all sorts of exploding things. During WWII they even managed to sell the same arms to both sides. As we said, they are industrious.)
Seventeen aircraft engineers of various talents (non of them reputedly held a driver's license) were assigned to develop a car. Being aircraft engineers, they were more interested in efficient engineering than fashion so out came a small, odd-looking aerodynamic vehicle powered by a two-stroke engine.
The rest is more or less history. Saab established itself as a quirky manufacturer of quirky cars which were embraced on this side of the ocean by people who were dying to let people know how sophisticated they were and how much they were not influenced by crass automotive commercialism.
Then in the late '80's General Motors figured out that the best way to compete with the world's automotive companies was to buy as many as they could and sign joint ventures with the rest.
We all know how that turned out.
Unfortunately one of the companies they bought was Saab. Next, the question was "what are we going to do with this thing?" Their first thought was to sell a lot more Saabs than could ever have been sold before. So to accomplish this, Saab's crazy vehicles had to be made more mainstream. More mainstream cars and voila, more mainstream sales equals more sales. Simple, no?
No.
GM's stewardship basically stripped Saab of anything Saab-like. They moved the hidden ignition switch to where some lout could actually find it. The cars looked more like Chevys than Saabs. And in one stroke, the reason for the Saab brand simply wandered off into Scandinavia's piny woods to die of dullness.
The final indignity was the imposition of a GMC SUV with a Saab badge (the Saab 9-7X).
I guess the question has to be asked if Saab could have survived if GM kept its hands off? Probably not. The rise of mainland Asia as an automotive power could spell the end for more European brands than Saab. As we have witnessed, a proud history means nothing to nobody when it comes to the economic realities of the Global marketplace.
Have an opinion?
Kevin Posted: 12/18/2009 2:39pm PST
btlh2oguy Posted: 12/18/2009 3:48pm PST
GM might as well pull out of Europe.
The US taxpayer gets screwed again.
winter olympics Posted: 12/18/2009 6:57pm PST
xxxx Posted: 12/18/2009 8:20pm PST
Please, I hope any Chinese or Indian company are interested. I really don't wanna see this brand go. I was thinking that maybe one day if i'm rich enough, I would probably go for a SAAB instead of BMW or Mercedes. Didn't see this coming at all. What a shame!!!
Michael Posted: 12/18/2009 8:59pm PST
Rick Buscavage Posted: 12/19/2009 5:19am PST
Roy Posted: 12/19/2009 8:58am PST
Saab was also known for it's cockpits. Although they had a habit of hiding switches in maddening ways, they were among the first to get away from slab-sided dashboards and focus on ergonomics.
As Spyker and Koenigsegg have subsequently shown, there was a market for quirky, exclusive, sporty Scandinavian cars. I think it's a shame that GM couldn't manage to sell Saab to either of these companies. Then again, what else should I expect from a company that struggles to sell cars and trucks to people in Detroit.
Oh, but I should note that Vauxhall and Opel are GM brands in Europe that are vastly superior to GM, even though they start with a very similar collection of vehicles. Saab didn't have to go, but Wagoner sure did.
viggense Posted: 12/19/2009 11:25am PST
davidturnedge Posted: 12/20/2009 1:21pm PST
Miami Traffic School Posted: 12/20/2009 9:26pm PST
motorbike for sale Posted: 12/20/2009 10:53pm PST
RH512 Posted: 12/21/2009 8:04am PST
GM has neglected not only Saab but their own brands. They invested in the wrong things and made awful decisions for so many years. Terrible follow through even when they had a promising product.
sdhc video cards Posted: 2/3/2010 8:31pm PST
The issue is mismanagement, how else do you explain a corporation taking over a company and allowing a model to stay on the market unchanged other than minor updates for over ten years?
Motoring Posted: 2/18/2010 12:18am PST
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!