
2010 Buick LaCrosse 4-door Sedan CX 3.0L Angular Front Exterior View
Potential 2010 Buick LaCrosse customers will soon have a third engine option to choose from, with the announcement today that a new entry-level model equipped with a four-cylinder engine will be offered next year.
The LaCrosse CX with a fuel-efficient direct injected Ecotec 2.4-liter four-cylinder engine will be priced at $26,995 and promises fuel economy of 20 mpg in the city and 30 mpg on the highway.
The Ecotec 2.4-liter four-cylinder joins the lineup in the first quarter of 2010 as the standard engine in the LaCrosse CX. Direct injection technology helps it deliver 182 horsepower and 172 pound-feet of torque, and Buick expects that roughly 25% of customers will opt for this engine.
Every engine in the LaCrosse lineup is direct injected and matched with a fuel-saving six speed automatic transmission. Along with the Ecotec 2.4-liter, a direct injected 3.0-liter V-6 is also offered as well as a larger-displacement and more powerful 3.6-liter V-6 standard on the LaCrosse CXS model.
[General Motors]
---------------
High Gear Media has partnered with Tesla Motors on a new writing contest where YOU can win a tour and road test of the 2010 Tesla Roadster Sport. You can submit as many articles as you like and enter multiple times. Enter now!
Have an opinion?
winter olympics Posted: 12/17/2009 6:52pm PST
bepsf Posted: 12/17/2009 8:57pm PST
john Posted: 12/17/2009 10:37pm PST
r4 dsi Posted: 12/18/2009 1:36am PST
I have no problem with the 4 (apparently, so did majority of honda/toyota owner who are buying 4 cylinder in large volume), it is the price that i have to bark at, $27K for a mid size car ? Even though this is the nicer looking Buick.
My Wheels On Walls Posted: 12/18/2009 5:02am PST
Huhhh? I guess they can only be as good as Lexus when their cars have jammed throttles and the company lolly gags and looks the other way on the issue.
Lets not forget Buick along with Jaguar won JD Power's award for Vehicle Dependability for 2009 and I doubt Lexus will fare any better this year either. Looking forward (and to new customers that's what count's) I think we'll see Buick holding a new place within the market place.
Just my two cents....
beelzebub Posted: 12/18/2009 6:45am PST
bepsf Posted: 12/18/2009 1:30pm PST
My point is that GM is now attempting to pitch Buick as a Lexus competitor - but introducing an otherwise rather nice 2-ton entry-luxury sedan that's been stripped-down to steel wheels & plastic wheelcovers, an anemic (for this size of car) 4-cylinder and cloth interior.
If this were a Malibu it would be expected and make sense - but what's the point in moving up to a Buick to get a stripped, plain-jane, lethargic sedan?
This is not how you make a brand more desirable - this is classic GM making a brand meaningless.
themishmosh Posted: 12/19/2009 6:20am PST
sdhc video cards Posted: 2/4/2010 1:18am PST
it is the price that i have to bark at, $27K for a mid size car ? Even though this is the nicer looking Buick.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!