More 2011 Honda CR-Z Brochure Pics, Info Leaked

 

2011 Honda CR-Z leak

Come next year, Honda will finally have a new sports car in its portfolio and in a sign of the times it will be both compact and a hybrid. The car is the 2011 Honda CR-Z hybrid sports hatch and many are already calling it the spiritual successor to the original CRX. Today another batch of photos has leaked, this time including the car's dashboard and more interior shots, taken from a video filmed in Japan.

A near production ready example was shown recently at the 2009 Tokyo Auto Show and now we have our first look at the actual car--and all of its specs--that will go on sale next year thanks to a previously leaked brochure.

Power will come from a 1.5-liter engine matched to Honda’s Integrated Motor Assist (IMA) electric motor hybrid technology. Output from the four-cylinder gasoline engine will be rated at 112 horsepower and 107 pound-feet of torque, while output from the electric motor will be rated at 12 horsepower and 57 pound-feet of torque. Drive is sent to the front wheels via a 6-speed manual transmission or optional Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT).

The end result is a leisurely 0-62 mph time of 9.7 seconds but we’ll have to wait until official details come out to be sure. According to the text in the brochure, the CR-Z ought to be rated for about 59 mpg with the CVT and 53 mpg with the manual in Japan's average fuel economy metric.

Other tidbits revealed include the dimensions, with the new model measuring in at 160.6-inches in length, 68.5-inches in width, 54.9-inches in height and with a wheelbase of 95.9-inches.

The 2011 Honda CR-Z will be introduced to North America for sale in the second half of 2010 and will be packaged as a sporty two-seater hybrid (the concept features a rear seat). Its first showing, however, will be at this month's 2010 Detroit Auto Show.






 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
Comments (17)
  1. i ponder if the US version will be different - namely more hp
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. They should have added a Turbo to the 1.5 petrol engine... same thing as VW did with the Golf 1.4TSI, same consumption and emissions but more power and grunt!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. Performance is about the same as a base CRX back in the day, which is to say not great but I'm sure it feels peppy because of the size. And it looks good, which is probably more important to the sorority girls who will be driving it. I like the FT-86 just a bit better though.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. Wow. Not a good wow. Good looking. But sweet lord Honda. 112 hp? We know "green" is the new "green". But seriously? What happened to you? Guess I'll either have to build up the gen 1 sho or get a rx-8 if I want over 8K RPM. I'll miss you Honda.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. Kudos to Honda for keeping most of the fine details from concept CRZ intact.
    I think this will be a very popoular hybrid alternative hatch, and could spawn a few of aftermarket tuned versions.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. To Hubix in response to: They should have added a Turbo to the 1.5 petrol engine... same thing as VW did with the Golf 1.4TSI, same consumption and emissions but more power and grunt!
    It's a Honda. What power and grunt?? Realistically they should have put the 2.0TypeR in it to make it a least bit entertaining to enthusiasts.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. There is also Mugen brochure out there: http://www.crzpower.com/general/another-brochure-leaked-this-time-by-mugen/
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  8. That kind of power would be perfectly fine in a car that weighed less than 750kg (~1700 lb). However, the pedestrian acceleration numbers suggest it weighs as much as a Fit/Jazz. Maybe I'll just buy a Fit to save money, get better acceleration, and not have to worry about the impact of the batteries on the car's handling and/or the environment.
    Honda, for the non-Californians among us, this one just doesn't add up... (For the Californians this could become as popular as the original Insight, a commuter car par excellence that still changes hands at the original retail price even with 100,000 miles on the clock!)
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  9. The CR-Z is overweight at 2850 lb; the earlier CRX and Insight weighed in at 1750 and 1880, respectively. Therefore, to even match their performance, Honda would have to use larger engine sizes. I have a 2000 Insight and consider it one of the best cars ever made. Where is the follow-on that gets even better mileage than the 60+mpg I'm getting even at 125k miles? The 59mpg in the Japanese metric is equivalent to about 45 in the US EPA metric. Better than many, but they can certainly do much better.
    And Honda is missing the PHEV boat; why are they limiting themselves so? The competition in this space is fierce, and they need to carve out a sizeable niche they can be proud of, just like they used to.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  10. Under the hood Honda will use its Integrated Motor Assist (IMA) gasoline/electric setup with a 1.5-liter engine and electric motor. Engine power is 112-hp and 107 ft-lbs, while the electric motor kicks in 14-hp and 57 ft-lbs. With either a six-speed manual or CVT gearbox, the CR-Z can hit 62 mph in an unimpressive 9.7 seconds just a tenth faster than the Prius.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  11. It looks more like an Insight in these pics ... perhaps they should life a page from Toyota's book & call it the Insight coupe to bring up sale #s by combining vehicles.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  12. Actually I think that it looks like a toyota prius from the back. It has the hatch back door just like a prius. I'm going to call it the Honda prius.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  13. I do think the Citroen C4 was the inspiration for this look.. which is one one the most under-rated designs since Giorgetto Giugiaro's 1973 Volkswagen Scirroco.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  14. Ha, I'd rather have the Citroen!
    This is not a sports car. Sporty hybrid? Maybe. But hybrid, FWD, 112hp, 0-62 in 9.7, sports car? Definitely not. It does look better than the Prius and Insight, though.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  15. I'm sure it feels peppy because of the size. And it looks good, which is probably more important to the sorority girls who will be driving it. I like the FT-86 just a bit better though.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  16. The mileage shown works out to 53-59 miles per gallon. Impressive, though it's a different test than the EPA cycle. I don't see a weight figure, and that kind of worries me...
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  17. It looks more like an Insight in these pics ... perhaps they should life a page from Toyota's book & call it the Insight......
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Research New Cars

Go!


 
© 2011 MotorAuthority. All Rights Reserved. MotorAuthority is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.
 

Use the form below to send us a tip, give us feedback, or just say hello.

(max 750 characters)