Saab Sale Dead As Koenigsegg Group Terminates Purchase

 

2010 Saab 9-5

The disastrous scenario of Penske and Saturn is playing out once again, this time with Koenigsegg pulling out of the agreement to buy Saab from GM. So far neither GM nor Saab have revealed the reason behind the decision.

GM's CEO Fritz Henderson released a statement this morning confirming the death of the deal. "We're obviously very disappointed with the decision to pull out of the Saab purchase," said Henderson. Where Saab will go next isn't clear, but there's now a very real risk the brand could end up on the scrap heap alongside Saturn and Pontiac.

"Given the sudden change in direction, we will take the next several days to assess the situation and will advise on the next steps next week," said Henderson, but the short missive didn't detail what the "situation" looks like behind the scenes.

Looking forward to next week's announcements, potential options include: termination of the brand, sale to an as-yet unnamed third party, or further support from the Swedish government pending a search for another buyer. Unfortunately for fans of the quirky Scandinavian brand, winding down and termination is the most likely in the new scenario.

Saab had been working on bringing out the new 9-5, a sort of return-to-roots visual design, to be followed shortly by Saab's first non-GM design since it was purchased back in 1989. The 9-3X and 9-4X were expected to fill the gap in the mean time.

As always, we'll bring you the latest on this situation as it happens.

[GM]





 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
Comments (9)
  1. Perhaps they're more interested in buying Volvo?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. Sad,sad,sad,...oh well.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. What!?!?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. SAAB is no different from Saturn. It is basically rebadged Opel which nobody wants to buy. Just shut it down if no one is interested. GM needs to shrink and consolidate their European operations anyway. http://bit.ly/2Lsw39
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. saabs suck... they probably drove one and realized it is one of the worse designed cars ever built. "Hey, this thing blows chunks, let's take it back"
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. What a way to begin my day! It's a shame that they pulled out of the deal. I was expecting them to bring SAAB to the level of the germans. Only gud know what the ral reason behind the decision is :(
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. Wow, what ignorance from people who've never driven a saab. Don't get offended now, and don't be a sorry loser and claim to either.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  8. I own one 2004 93 aero. Although engine and drive train are reliable. What Saab lacks are refinement, solid build, luxurious feel, and up to date technology and feel. I feel like the car is 5 years or more behind competitor at this price range. My 1991 Honda accord EX has no rattle and interior pieces don't fall apart. So what is Saab excuse for steering volume control not working, some interior panel came loose, sunroof motor need to be replace, leaking cooling fluid, etc..
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  9. Lower the price of SAAB and may be more people would be interested in buying it and having it as their dream car.I’m not surprised I could never see the point of Saab, other car companies have their niche be it cheap, reliable, sporty, luxurious, safe, stylish or what ever but Saab was never really any of these they just were in the middle ground of everything.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Research New Cars

Go!


 
© 2011 MotorAuthority. All Rights Reserved. MotorAuthority is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.
 

Use the form below to send us a tip, give us feedback, or just say hello.

(max 750 characters)