Lincoln MKS EcoBoost Pitted Against Maserati Quattroporte at 12,000 feet

 
Follow Nelson

2010 Lincoln MKS with EcoBoost

2010 Lincoln MKS with EcoBoost

Enlarge Photo

2010 Lincoln MKS with EcoBoost

2010 Lincoln MKS with EcoBoost

Enlarge Photo

In a phenomenally disappointing choice of marketing tactics, Ford today unveiled its "6versus8" campaign, presented by a pair of buff books and featuring some of the least relevant comparisons in recent memory. To give the V-6 EcoBoost a fighting chance against the big V-8 engines, Ford even tilts the playing field by running them against each other at 12,000 feet.

The move to high altitude is no doubt to widen the gap between the naturally-aspirated luxury V-8 cars and the twin-turbocharged V-6, since forced induction engines are, by nature, not as sensitive to the reduced oxygen present at higher altitudes. That's an unfortunate move, because it says from the outset that Ford doesn't think the engine will win in a fair fight at elevations experienced day-to-day by 95% of the U.S. population. Which kind of guts the whole point of the comparison.

Predictably, the MKS beats all but the BMW 550i, the power benefit of running the twin-turbo EcoBoost engine at altitude overcoming the MKS's decidedly less sporty suspension setup.

The worst part is that the EcoBoost engine and the MKS it rides in are both sold short by this lack of confidence. The EcoBoost engine is lively and responsive and every bit the equal of an equally-tuned V-8 engine. The MKS is a solid luxury sedan that offers more value than almost any European offering and most Japanese luxury cars, too.

That's what makes the advertorial fluff in this Motor Trend/Automobile/Ford video presentation comparing the MKS EcoBoost against the Jaguar XF, Mercedes-Benz E550, Maserati Quattroporte, and BMW 550i so annoying. Stacking the deck is one thing, doing it with the presumption of the MKS's failure to stack up from the outset is worse.

Nevertheless, once you sift through the thicket of advertising-speak, there is some nice in-car video of both the MKS and the "challengers," offering at least a little redemption to this otherwise pointless exercise.

Check out our review for our thoughts and experiences with the 2009 Lincoln MKS (non-EcoBoost model).





 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (6)
  1. No offense, i'm a fan of the ecoboost engine and the MKS looks decent. But trying to trick the public by pitting it at 12,000 ft is kinda low. If your car dosen't have the means of beating a maserati at sea level, then don't pit it against a maserati.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. OK - stacked deck and all, but I want to do a high altitude test too.
    I want to take a Chevy Volt leaving Coors field in Denver, go west on 1-70 to US 40 and over the Berthoud Pass, then across Rocky Mountain Ntl Park on Trail Ridge Rd finally CO 7 south to I-70 then back to Denver. (And the Volt uses an NA 1.4L 70+ HP generator once the batteries are at 50%.)
    Whose with me? ; -)
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. Reminds me of the old "Do blindfolded people prefer Cadillac Sedan De Ville or Mercury Marquis" commercials...
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. Is Ford's test more disappointing -- or is it the buff books' endorsement of an all-Ford comparo worse?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. No offense to you all but maybe you are missing the point. EcoBoost is a sweet engine and all in the MKS EcoBoost package is less expensive than cars Lincoln seems to want to compare itself to. Point is, they have a very compelling story when you look at price, performance and overall value. Also, I take this as a pretty authentic test. If it were an endorsment then why did Lincoln not win?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. They totally forgot about the Audi A6 V8...what a terrible thing to do, its sly and just an underhanded move. Lets compare a turbo charged car vs N/A cars on top of mount Everest.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Connect with Facebook

Motor Authority. Now with your friends.

Discover stories your friends read.
Share stories more easily.
You control what you share.
Learn more

Research New Cars

Go!


 
© 2011 MotorAuthority. All Rights Reserved. MotorAuthority is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.