Audi To Drop V-10 For Turbo V-8?

 
Follow Nelson

2010 Audi R8 V-10

2010 Audi R8 V-10

Enlarge Photo

2009 Detroit auto show

2009 Detroit auto show

Enlarge Photo

2010 Audi R8 V-10

2010 Audi R8 V-10

Enlarge Photo

2010 Audi R8 V-10

2010 Audi R8 V-10

Enlarge Photo

The Audi R8 V-10 is just hitting retail and already talk of the demise of its fantastic powerplant are underway. The tired mantra of fuel efficiency killing the horsepower car has reared its ugly head once again.

But all is not lost even if the V-10 goes the way of the dodo at Audi; though it might not be as impressive or as sonorous, there's reportedly a 550-horsepower twin-turbocharged V-8 already waiting in the wings to take the V-10's place.

The track record of downsizing and adding forced induction at Audi is brief, but so far, fantastic; take the S4 for example: dropping the 340-horsepower naturally aspirated 4.2-liter V-8 engine of past models for a 333-horsepower supercharged V-6 engine, the new car is  more efficient and just as fast, with even more low-end response thanks to 325 pound-feet of torque from its forced-induction system.

Improvements in fuel economy weren't minor for the S4: the old V-8 got 13 mpg in the city and 20 mpg on the highway. The new supercharged V-6 S4 gets a much more livable 18 mpg in town and 27 mpg on the highway. Oh, and it's cheaper than the old S4, too--over $11,000 cheaper.

Even if the V-10's goose is cooked, however, it'll take at least until the end of the model cycles of the current Audi RS6 and R8 5.2 FSI V-10s before they'll actually go away, so there's a few years left to get yours if you simply can't stand the thought of losing the sound of ten half-liter pistons walloping your ear drums while faced with the four-rings logo.

Weighing the advantages against the nostalgia, we prefer to look at the possible demise of the Audi V-10 as less the end of an era and more as a changing of the guard--to an upgraded, more high-tech, if somewhat less characterful, guard.

[Autoblog.nl]





 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (4)
  1. I take it this is also what the next generation baby lambo will be getting to then? Why have a v10 in your stable when its only used by one car.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. Product differentiation is a good thing. Better than sticking two different faces on highly similar AWD V-10 mid-engine supercars and calling one a Gallardo and one an Audi (yes, there are more differences, but it's the principle).
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. They use this engine (non-turbo) V10 in the S6 and the S8 don't they?
    If they whack in a turbo it may take some of the fun away if the car just pushes itself along with all the torque but no need to climb the rev band.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. The whole point of the car was the V10! If I was in the market for such a thing I wouldn't get it if there was only a V8. V10 or W12 but NOT a V8, anyone can have one of those. :-)
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Connect with Facebook

Motor Authority. Now with your friends.

Discover stories your friends read.
Share stories more easily.
You control what you share.
Learn more

Research New Cars

Go!


 
© 2011 MotorAuthority. All Rights Reserved. MotorAuthority is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.