BMW and Volkswagen downsizing to three-cylinder engines

 

Impending fuel economy standards leave few cost-effective options for carmakers in the U.S.

Impending fuel economy standards leave few cost-effective options for carmakers in the U.S.

Enlarge Photo
Expect to see smaller engines for BMW’s and Volkswagen’s future models, as high fuel prices and greater environmental concerns are pushing buyers towards engines with lower displacements and carmakers would be foolish to ignore the trend. VW’s plans to introduce a new three-cylinder variant of the Golf appear to be going ahead, according the carmaker’s development chief Ulrich Hackenberg. As a part of this environmental push, VW will also introduce hybrid variants based on its TwinDrive technology.

The future of the three-cylinder engine for the Golf looks optimistic, with Hackenberg stating that the company is developing the engine further but that it has a "great future". He also mentioned the fact that the Golf could be fitted with some form of electric propulsion - although sales would likely be focused on "megacities in China and the U.S."

BMW, too, is looking to downsize to three-cylinder engines for its base models. Sources close to both companies revealed the plans to Germany’s Auto Motor und Sport. For BMW, its three-cylinder engine will first be used in the next-generation 1-series due in 2011. The engines are currently in a testing phase and are still about two years away from launch.

While BMW is yet to confirm the reports, the new three-cylinder engine will displace 1.35L and output between 120hp (90kW) and 180hp (135kW) in various guises. The carmaker is also expected to launch a new four-cylinder engine to replace many of its six-cylinder units, which will displace 1.8L and output up to 240hp (180kW).

BMW is considering bringing this four-cylinder engine to the U.S. and Mercedes Benz is also thought to be planning a similarly small engine for its C-Class in the U.S. as well. Drivability will be key to their success, and to ensure adequate performance twin-turbocharging and direct-injection technology will be essential.



 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
Comments (7)
  1. With a turbo and DI a 3 cylinder can actually be a powerful engine
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. RIP big beefy engines. I'll never forget your greatness.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. These engines would be had on the lower-edition models, not the higher-end models, I would gather.

    The last line about BMW developing a four-cylinder to replace some six-cylinders - I would figure it would be a turbo (perhaps twin-turbo) four to replace the older, lower-end, non-turbo I-6 in the line-up, and not the twin-turbo I-6 in it's vehicles. If this is the case, BMW will have a full line if (twin)turbo powerplants in it's arsenal, from three to twelve cylinders.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. These engines would be had on the lower-edition models, not the higher-end models, I would gather.

    The last line about BMW developing a four-cylinder to replace some six-cylinders - I would figure it would be a turbo (perhaps twin-turbo) four to replace the older, lower-end, non-turbo I-6 in the line-up, and not the twin-turbo I-6 in it's vehicles. If this is the case, BMW will have a full line if (twin)turbo powerplants in it's arsenal, from three to twelve cylinders.

    Not just lower end models, the Motorsport version of the 1 series is supposed to get a high powered twin turbo 4 (glad it will not be called M1).
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. A 4 cyl twin turbo is a better engine for the 1 Series anyway, less weight, similar horse power and maybe more torque.

    For those who whine about BMW being synonymous with sixes, that was only true in the larger cars. The 1600/2002 and early 3 Series cars were all fours, including the original (and my favorite) M3.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. The problem with small engines or less cylinders isn't really the power anymore. They can be pretty loud. A few weeks ago, I drove a Golf 1.4 TSI, a Jetta 2.0 TDI and a Jetta 2.0 FSI. I expected the TSI to be at least "adequate," if not powerful and on the motorway/highway it's reasonable with acceleration. But in city driving, with the automatic, you have to rev it to 4,000 RPM before any considerable movement happens from standstill. The noise made it tiring to drive. But the TDI was a different animal, you can drive it like a normal car, and the noise wasn't as much of an issue (odd). The 2.0 FSI was OK too. Much older cars from the '70s or early '80s did have 4 cylinders, but having 8-valve engines, their torque delivery seemed to come at lower revs. You didn't need to push the gas all the way down to get a car moving.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. Pretty soon they’ll be hawking a new Isetta in America to compete with the Smart, iQ, 500 and now the Ka! How stupid will that look on our streets!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Research New Cars

Go!


 
© 2011 MotorAuthority. All Rights Reserved. MotorAuthority is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.
 

Use the form below to send us a tip, give us feedback, or just say hello.

(max 750 characters)