Obama kills the hydrogen car by slashing research funding

 

fcx clarity fuelcell motorauthority 001

Honda’s FCX Clarity is one of the few hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles built and sold to the public by a major carmaker

Honda’s FCX Clarity is one of the few hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles built and sold to the public by a major carmaker

Enlarge Photo
There may be debate over who killed the electric car, but we can now say with some certainty that the culprit behind killing the hydrogen car is none other than President Barack Obama. In his new budget, the President has eliminated funding to develop hydrogen fuel-cell cars, scrapping a $1.2 billion program first introduced by George W. Bush.

The reasoning behind the decision to eliminate this funding was purely pragmatic, according to the White House. The secretary of energy, Steven Chu, explained to Automotive News that the government needs to focus on immediate solutions for improving national efficiency.

Developing a viable hydrogen fuel-cell application for cars would need to be backed by massive changes to current infrastructure, including new hydrogen fueling stations, hydrogen pipelines and a host of other issues. Realistically speaking, the likelihood of seeing such a rollout within the next two decades was "low", according to a spokesman from the Energy Department.

Instead of hydrogen fuel-cell technologies, the Obama administration will focus on solutions that can be implemented now, such as electric cars and hybrids. There will, however, still be funding in place for research into stationary fuel-cells that are not used in cars.

Balancing the need for an immediate solution to current problems as well as preparing for the future has always been a tricky proposition for any President, but Obama's spending cuts on fuel-cell technologies will save taxpayers around $100 million per year - we just hope that future energy needs are also being considered.



 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
Comments (6)
  1. I seriously do not get this man. He preaches fuel independence(as with every other president for the past 30yrs) and then does this. Don't kill options because they didn't support your political campaign. Like trying to give Chrysler to the UAW...
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. The man is an idiot, there's nothing to get.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. It's worth bearing in mind that the recommendation will have come Stephen Chu and his advisors, not Obama.
    Chu is many things, but not an idiot. Honda has a functional hydrogen fuel cell car, so it's clear we don't need to develop the technology over the next two decades. This was only ever going to be an excuse to pour money into Detroit. If it's one thing we don't need it's another excuse to pour money into Detroit. The funding may also have provided some money for infrastructure, but I thought it was the Republicans who said if there's a demand, the markets will supply it. Some of you guys are every bit as reactionary and short-sighted as the Democrats you claim to have nothing in common with.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. Detroit, and the U.S. for that matter, needs a solution now. Not some hydrogen pipedream that will take years and billions more dollars to develop.

    Look how difficult it is to get electric cars into peoples' homes when we have been using electricity for the last 100 years. Imagine trying to introduce hydrogen cars - good luck.

    I too want fuel independence and choice - but at what cost?

    U.S. carmakers never made the tough/unpopular decisions. That's why they are in the trouble they are now. Look at Honda - the first sign its profits are starting to dip the company quits F1, cancels its NSX replacement.

    Thank god someone in the U.S.is making the tough decisions now. Obama is definately no idiot.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. Hydrogen never made sense as a transportation energy carrier. (Notice I said energy carrier, hydrogen is not a fuel source.) We get hydrogen in two ways:

    1. Strip hydrogen from natural gas

    2. Electrolysis which is using electricity to split water into hydrogen and oxygen.

    The problem is efficiency. It takes 3 times as much electricity to make and compress hydrogen into a useable form as it does to simply charge a battery for an electric car.

    If we want to use a fossil fuel (natural gas) to make hydrogen it is more efficient to simply burn the natural gas.

    So without even going into the problems of creating a fuel cell or the massive amount of work it would be to replace gasoline stations with hydrogen stations, the basic premise doesn't work.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. Hopefully the money will go to AIG or BAC bonuses so we can get the economy going again.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Research New Cars

Go!


 
© 2011 MotorAuthority. All Rights Reserved. MotorAuthority is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.
 

Use the form below to send us a tip, give us feedback, or just say hello.

(max 750 characters)