
fcx clarity fuelcell motorauthority 001

Honda’s FCX Clarity is one of the few hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles built and sold to the public by a major carmaker
Enlarge PhotoThere may be debate over who killed the electric car, but we can now say with some certainty that the culprit behind killing the hydrogen car is none other than President Barack Obama. In his new budget, the President has eliminated funding to develop hydrogen fuel-cell cars, scrapping a $1.2 billion program first introduced by George W. Bush.
The reasoning behind the decision to eliminate this funding was purely pragmatic, according to the White House. The secretary of energy, Steven Chu, explained to
Automotive News that the government needs to focus on immediate solutions for improving national efficiency.
Developing a viable hydrogen fuel-cell application for cars would need to be backed by massive changes to current infrastructure, including new hydrogen fueling stations, hydrogen pipelines and a host of other issues. Realistically speaking, the likelihood of seeing such a rollout within the next two decades was "low", according to a spokesman from the Energy Department.
Instead of hydrogen fuel-cell technologies, the Obama administration will focus on solutions that can be implemented now, such as electric cars and
hybrids. There will, however, still be funding in place for research into stationary fuel-cells that are not used in cars.
Balancing the need for an immediate solution to current problems as well as preparing for the future has always been a tricky proposition for any President, but Obama's spending cuts on fuel-cell technologies will save taxpayers around $100 million per year - we just hope that future energy needs are also being considered.
Honda FCX Clarity
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!
Chu is many things, but not an idiot. Honda has a functional hydrogen fuel cell car, so it's clear we don't need to develop the technology over the next two decades. This was only ever going to be an excuse to pour money into Detroit. If it's one thing we don't need it's another excuse to pour money into Detroit. The funding may also have provided some money for infrastructure, but I thought it was the Republicans who said if there's a demand, the markets will supply it. Some of you guys are every bit as reactionary and short-sighted as the Democrats you claim to have nothing in common with.
Look how difficult it is to get electric cars into peoples' homes when we have been using electricity for the last 100 years. Imagine trying to introduce hydrogen cars - good luck.
I too want fuel independence and choice - but at what cost?
U.S. carmakers never made the tough/unpopular decisions. That's why they are in the trouble they are now. Look at Honda - the first sign its profits are starting to dip the company quits F1, cancels its NSX replacement.
Thank god someone in the U.S.is making the tough decisions now. Obama is definately no idiot.
1. Strip hydrogen from natural gas
2. Electrolysis which is using electricity to split water into hydrogen and oxygen.
The problem is efficiency. It takes 3 times as much electricity to make and compress hydrogen into a useable form as it does to simply charge a battery for an electric car.
If we want to use a fossil fuel (natural gas) to make hydrogen it is more efficient to simply burn the natural gas.
So without even going into the problems of creating a fuel cell or the massive amount of work it would be to replace gasoline stations with hydrogen stations, the basic premise doesn't work.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!