
Delays in Chrysler’s bankruptcy proceeding led to fears that key models like the 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee may be delayed
Enlarge Photo
A U.S. bankruptcy judge on Sunday approved the sale of substantially all of Chrysler's assets to
Fiat, helping to finalize the two automaker’s alliance as well as the American company’s
bankruptcy proceedings. Approval was given for the $2 billion sale of the assets to a new company that will be 68% controlled by a healthcare trust aligned with the United Auto Workers (UAW) union. Fiat will control 20%, while the U.S. and Canadian governments will control the remaining 12%.
In his written opinion Judge Gonzalez said the only alternative to approving the sale was the "immediate liquidation" of the company and that he was concerned about saving the value of Chrysler as a continuing operation,
Reuters reports.
Objectors to the deal had included a group of Indiana pension funds holding secured debt, some of the 789 dealerships Chrysler plans to reject, and consumer groups. They had argued that Chrysler was moving too quickly, that the sale violated bankruptcy principals and that the company was needlessly closing hundreds of its dealerships.
In the lead up to Chrysler’s restructuring deadline, the carmaker was forced to shutdown a number of plants and leave thousands of vehicles, engines and components unfinished. This led to the fears that important model launches, like the
redesigned Jeep Grand Cherokee and
next-generation Chrysler 300, could be delayed.
The sale of Chrysler’s assets to the newly established Chrysler Group is expected to take place almost immediately. Incidentally, the decision was made less than 24 hours before Detroit rival General Motors announced its own bankruptcy, the details of which you can read about by clicking
here.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!
So here goes: Would'nt one want to develop, engineer, design and launch as much as possible while in bankruptcy so that way you can write that debt off?
Now I know someone on the this site is an esq, who can set me straight?
So here goes: Would'nt one want to develop, engineer, design and launch as much as possible while in bankruptcy so that way you can write that debt off?
Now I know someone on the this site is an esq, who can set me straight?
They couldn't develop anything during CH11 but I am sure some development costs for the new 300/Charger and Grand Cherokee were swept away.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!