
2010 chevrolet volt live paris 010
GM already working on second and third-gen...
Volt won't get DOE funds until GM passes...
GM shoots down Carnegie study claiming plug-in...
The argument goes that real-world efficiency of a plug-in hybrid isn't that much higher than a standard hybrid, so adding electric-only capacity is an exercise in adding cost, with no real benefit. A study by Carnegie Mellon University is the primary support for the position.
That study showed that using lighter and less expensive batteries aimed at an electric-only range of 7-12mi (11-20km) would offer the best compromise between expense and efficiency, and that combinations using larger batteries wouldn't be able to overcome the added expense with their slightly enhanced efficiency.
The primary implication of the study's findings - that the Volt and cars like it won't be adopted due to the out-of-whack cost calculus - hinges on one major assumption, however, and that is that the purchase of hybrids is financially motivated.
Taking a look back at the Prius, many of the same arguments were leveled at it, but that didn't stop it from becoming a major market success. That success was driven largely by early adopters wanting to do and be seen doing something for the environment.
Even when fuel prices were at their peak last summer, however, it would have taken at least 3.5 years to pay back the price differential between the Prius and the much higher-spec Camry LE. The Volt's expected near-$40,000 price tag won't win it any budget-conscious awards, but it isn't terribly far beyond the $30,000+ figures some Priuses were drawing when they were at the peak of their demand.
So the question isn't so much one of simple arithmetic - will this plug-in hybrid save me money - but one of complex social phenomena, and whether its green image will be enough to overcome the price hurdle.
Have an opinion?
1.Because the cost of entry is even less than a petrol/gas equivalent.
2. You the consumer start saving money on fuel instantly and not over time because you to make up for the cost of entry.
3. The factory they are built in already exists so no increase on the carbon footprint of the manufacturer making them.(dont forget Toyota is building four new battery plants this year alone)
4. Also you can still offer the same amount of platforms running multiple power trains. I.E. how does offering an extra model rather that replacing your existing small cars save the assumed troubled environment? If Toyota and Honda really cared about going green then why still have Civic, Fit, Corolla, Echo, Scion and then Prius and Insight on top of that.
I'll give it to the domestics in that not only do they now offer hybrids but they are only offered in existing platforms/models. Hopefully the Volt replaces an existing platform/model.
Once again going green is a full on committment of reality and not a game of smoke, mirrors and perception. Hence this years winner of the worlds greenest car was the VW Jetta diesel because from cradle to grave it truely is a green car....
nintendo dsi r4 Posted: 1/9/2010 9:15pm PST
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!