Kia, Audi Take Top Spot In Least Expensive Brands...

New Alfa Romeo 169 flagship may ride on Chrysler 300 LX platform

 
10 7,639 views June 15, 2009

alfa romeo 149 rendering 001

alfa romeo 149 rendering 001

Enlarge Photo
The long-awaited return of Fiat and Alfa Romeo is due to get underway soon following the signing of the new alliance with Chrysler, and word of the first cars to be brought in is finally emerging. While most of the Italian cars will be skewed towards the smaller end of town, one of the most anticipated, the Alfa 169 (the replacement for the aging 166), will be a large, luxurious, RWD saloon.

Reports coming out today claim that the Alfa Romeo 169 could be manufactured at Chrysler’s Brampton plant in Ontario. According to research firm IHS Global Insight, the 169 will most likely ride on the RWD platform that underpins the Chrysler 300 and Dodge Charger models and will be priced around the $40,000 mark.

If the research firm’s predications prove true, the new Alfa Romeo 169 would likely be powered by Chrysler’s new Pentastar V6 engine and would share much in common with the next-generation Chrysler 300 sedan due next year. Production volumes would be low, with only about 10,000 units expected annually.

Chrysler spokeswoman Mary Gauthier told the Financial Post that the company is still reviewing production plans and no final decisions on building Fiat vehicles in Canada have been made. Tax incentives and loan commitments to the Canadian government, however, suggest that it is a very real possibility.



Tags:
Posted in:
 
Contribute
Send us a tip Comment Contact the editor
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
Comments (10)

  1. ma_NoNameDenton avatar NoNameDenton Posted: 2/16/2009 3:09pm PST

    That would sure get people into Chrysler show rooms
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. ma_Mike avatar Mike Posted: 2/16/2009 4:33pm PST

    I stopped believing Alfa several years ago. I know they're "returning", but whenever they set an actual date, it inevitably gets delayed another two years. And another. And another.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. ma_NoNameDenton avatar NoNameDenton Posted: 2/16/2009 5:29pm PST

    I like the idea of a rwd Alfa sedan, especially on a platform as good as that one
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. ma_Jim avatar Jim Posted: 2/17/2009 7:03am PST

    The speculation for Chrysler & Fiat is getting ahead of the reality as Chrysler maybe in bankruptcy by April Fools day.

    Let us see what they report their plan is to the Feds today.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. ma_54chevyman avatar 54chevyman Posted: 6/15/2009 4:52pm PDT

    That is an overweight and dated platform, but with some upgrades it may work. What they need is a great handling chassis. These key decisions will decide how experts view this Italian beauty!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. ma_NoNameDenton avatar NoNameDenton Posted: 6/15/2009 4:57pm PDT

    That is an overweight and dated platform, but with some upgrades it may work. What they need is a great handling chassis. These key decisions will decide how experts view this Italian beauty!

    Dated and yet it still got top reviews.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. ma_Roy avatar Roy Posted: 6/15/2009 7:51pm PDT

    I can't imagine anything worse than Italian build quality with a German-designed (harsh, firm) but American executed (soft, wallowy) chassis. I really hope we don't get a horrible handling, yet ludicrously softly sprung rust-bucket that lacks the best features of any of these fine car-producing nations.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  8. ma_54chevyman avatar 54chevyman Posted: 6/15/2009 7:51pm PDT

    I thought the chassis rode a little rough and didnt corner well and was heavy thus not fuel efficient? I hope Im wrong!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  9. ma_NoNameDenton avatar NoNameDenton Posted: 6/15/2009 8:47pm PDT

    I can't imagine anything worse than Italian build quality with a German-designed (harsh, firm) but American executed (soft, wallowy) chassis. I really hope we don't get a horrible handling, yet ludicrously softly sprung rust-bucket that lacks the best features of any of these fine car-producing nations.

    They 300 got great reviews even for handling (not the best but not bad) and Italians are doing better for build quality
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  10. ma_54chevyman avatar 54chevyman Posted: 6/16/2009 4:18am PDT

    Saab comes to mind, GM really turned their quality around. Same can be said for Fiat besides they have some of the best engineers in the world over there they bag one and it's Ducati II! GM really had it made with Opel, and to a lesser degree Saab! We'll see how it all shakes out but the potential is there for the US to be lean and mean. GM has plans to use magnesium in the drive train, my girlfriend almost got a job as a material scientist there! They have one of the best labs period!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Research New Cars

Go!


More from High Gear Media

 
 
MotorAuthority
  • Follow Us
  • Twiiter
  • Facebook
 
 
© 2011 MotorAuthority. All Rights Reserved. MotorAuthority is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.
 

Use the form below to send us a tip, give us feedback, or just say hello.

(max 750 characters)