Fiat and PSA Peugeot-Citroen deny merger rumors

 

Both companies have denied the merger rumors yet they are still open to cooperating on joint-projects

Both companies have denied the merger rumors yet they are still open to cooperating on joint-projects

Enlarge Photo
Fiat Group, Chrysler and its parent company Cerberus Capital Management in January released a joint statement announcing they had signed a non-binding term sheet to establish a global strategic alliance. The alliance, a key element of Chrysler’s viability plan, would provide the American carmaker with access to competitive, fuel-efficient vehicle platforms, new powertrains, and components to be produced at Chrysler manufacturing sites. Soon after the initial statement, rumors suggesting PSA Peugeot-Citroen could also be in merger talks with Fiat quickly emerged.

Both companies have since denied the rumors, telling Italy's Il Sole 24 Ore newspaper that there are no plans to merge with any other parties. However, both have reiterated that they are open to cooperating with other companies on projects that could create industrial synergies or open access to new markets.

According to an insider, however, Italian investment bank Mediobanca has been contacted by Fiat about drawing up a report on merging Fiat's automotive operations with those of PSA. Previous reports also suggested that Fiat was searching Europe to secure a credit line of up to €5 billion to finance a takeover of PSA.

While no one is suggesting that Fiat and PSA are about to merge, it’s often the case that the companies deny rumors only when there is some truth behind them. We wouldn’t be surprised to see some kind of a deal forged, though don’t expect a full blown alliance like the one that will likely take place between Fiat and Chrysler.



 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
Comments (24)
  1. Gee, GM basically bails out Fiat several years ago and now Fiat to bail out Chrysler? Strange world!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. Gee, GM basically bails out Fiat several years ago and now Fiat to bail out Chrysler? Strange world!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. How about the 500 underpins a small car for Chrysler, and the 300/Charger/Challenger can underpin some rwd products for Alfa.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. chrysler please dont corrupt fiat there past few cars have been pretty good.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. No worries azlan, if GM couldn't screw up Fiat doubt Chrsyler could
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. haha i hope your right =]
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. I wonder what would the offspring of Fiat and Chrysler would look like. AMC pacer? Finally I can't wait for Alfa to be here.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  8. I hope Fiat isn't as bad as M&B was with business, planning and engineering. Chrysler won't survive another merger of equals.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  9. That's an enormous poison pill to swallow. I can't believe that Fiat would take such a huge stake in such a lousy car company. Reminiscent of humpty-dumpty, M-B sent all their best engineers over to the US, and still couldn't fix Chrysler. It shored Chrysler up in the short-term but took a huge toll on M-B quality, engineering, and design.
    In lots of ways this makes sense: Fiat sells a lot of small and medium front-drive cars, but also owns luxury marques like Maserati and Ferrari. The gap in their line-up lines up nicely with Chrysler's expertise: trucks and SUVs. Let's hope Fiat tells Chrysler to slim down and focus on their core strengths.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  10. Before M&B came along Chrysler was profitable, had reliable cars, had four divisions and had high fleet MPG. When M&B "and their engineers" got done with them, reliability dropped, was not profitable, lost market share, engineering was terrible and the cars became ugly and inefficient.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  11. I definitely understand Fiat's desire to get back in the U.S. (I'd love to buy a modern Alfa), but there can't be much left in Chrysler's stables that Fiat could sell in Europe. Dodge Ram pickups? I think not? Chrysler 300? Not in any measurable numbers, given its size. Minivans? Already made in Europe and sold there. Jeeps? Maybe, but Europeans largely shun SUVs. Good thing this isn't costing Fiat a dollar or euro.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  12. Alfa always had some great looking and sounding cars. Nice to see them back in the US.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  13. This is not like the MB situation, this is an alliance not a merger
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  14. Just hope that some of the Design flair that the Italians have heads towards Chrysler
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  15. Well, Chrysler has proven they can do great designs, look at the 200C concept.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  16. I heard the opposite I heard PSA was not ging to join
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  17. http://www.leftlanenews.com/fiat-denies-peugeot-citroen-merger-plans.html
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  18. Jeeps? Maybe, but Europeans largely shun SUVs.
    Get a compass, adamk.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  19. NaBUru38: I'm not sure what a compass or any other navigational device has to do with my original statement that most Europeans do not share the American fondness for SUVs. My point remains that Fiat's small car expertise is likely to be of more benefit to Chrysler than anything the U.S. automaker might hope to sell in Europe.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  20. Not new news
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  21. adamk, read this list: X1, X3, GLK, XC60, Q3, Q5, Q7, 3008, 4007, C-Crosser, Tiguan, Kuga, Sedici, Qashqai, Yeti. If Europeans weren't interested in SUVs, why would they release so many of them?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  22. The Chrysler 300C is sold in Europe as a sort of luxury car. Jeeps are sold here too. We also get the Dodge Viper, Nitro (hideously ugly), Magnum and Chrysler Sebring. You do see a few SUVs on the roads here, but they're mostly owned by the more wealthy.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  23. For some reason I think Fiat is more likely to do a deal with Nissan-Renault. Why? Because Chrysler has dealings with Nissan-Renault right now and in the near future, and Fiat just jumped on that bandwagon so unless NR wants their stuff coming led with PSA's stuff any Fiat deal with PSA would likely mean a break of Chrysler ties with Nissan-Renault.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  24. I couldn't agree more with the poster that said Alfa has great cars. I too would like to see them back in our country.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Research New Cars

Go!


 
© 2011 MotorAuthority. All Rights Reserved. MotorAuthority is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.
 

Use the form below to send us a tip, give us feedback, or just say hello.

(max 750 characters)