2013 Cadillac XTS

Small car fuel savings offset by higher insurance costs

 
4 1,546 views Oct 26, 2008
Follow Nelson

Historically higher injury claims, theft rates the driving forces behind higher insurance rates

Historically higher injury claims, theft rates the driving forces behind higher insurance rates

Enlarge Photo
Savings at the pump may be a false economy for small cars, as higher insurance costs offset the financial benefits of higher fuel efficiency. For many popular models, the difference in insurance costs can exceed $500, wiping out the savings of a car that gets 35mpg on average over one that gets 25mpg.

For a typical driver that travels 15,000mi (24,000km) annually, a car that gets 25mpg on average will cost about $1,800 in fuel per year at $3/gallon. A car rated at 35mpg will cost about $1,285 - a savings of $515. But the difference in insurance premiums between a 2009 Mini Cooper rated at 37mpg, and a Toyota Sienna Minivan rated at 23mpg is about $438, reports The Wall Street Journal, leaving the savings of the smaller vehicle at about $75 per year, or a little more than $6 per month.

Insurance companies typically relate the historical trends of a vehicle's class to the type of driver in order to determine policy rates. The data for small cars, while reflecting lower property damage liability rates, does show higher theft rates and higher personal injury rates than larger cars and SUVs.

Hybrids are also typically more expensive to insure than their standard-engine counterparts. The reasoning behind the difference is based on similar grounds: according to the Highway Loss Data Institute, an affiliate of the IIHS, crash damage costs are higher for hybrids in 11 of 12 cases, or about 92% of the time.



Tags:
Posted in:
 
Contribute
Send us a tip Comment Contact the editor
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (4)

  1. ma_gus avatar Gus Chyba Posted: 10/26/2008 11:10am PDT

    This makes sense, unfortunately.
    Typical buyers of the smaller vehicles have historically been younger, less experienced drivers.
    But the higher propensity for serious injury is a no-brainer (no pun intended)...
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. ma_james avatar James Martinez Posted: 10/26/2008 1:17pm PDT

    first of all, that was the best no pun intended ever.
    second, i wish this problem didn't arise. this is just really bad news topping of some horrible financial times. just keeps getting worse and worse. motor authority has become more of an economy predictor site than it used to be
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. ma_HECTOR avatar HECTOR Posted: 10/27/2008 3:38am PDT

    Leave it to the insurance companies to come and ruin the fun. Additional premiums from insurance companies for things like car color, where's the car kept, etc are nothing but gimmicks to get additional money out of you.

    Now apparently driving a small car is a bad thing for them.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. By  Car Insurance Posted: 10/20/2009 10:13am PDT

    What a bad news, I don't see any points to charge that much higher. They are just ripping us.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Connect with Facebook

Motor Authority. Now with your friends.

Discover stories your friends read.
Share stories more easily.
You control what you share.
Learn more

Research New Cars

Go!


More from High Gear Media

 
 
MotorAuthority
  • Follow Us
  • Twiiter
  • Facebook
 
 
© 2011 MotorAuthority. All Rights Reserved. MotorAuthority is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.