Nissan GT-R: In The Belly Of The Beast
10 Fastest Cars For The Money
2012 Nissan GT-R Shipments Delayed By Japan...
The Skyline GT-R is two seconds ahead of the 911 Turbo and a whopping eight seconds ahead of the Gallardo Superleggera, lapping the 'ring in a searing 7:38, according to Edmunds. In fact, given the possible margin of error introduced by hand-timing, the GT-R could be running in a league with the Porsche 911 GT2, which laps the 'ring in a scorching 7:32.
Adding even more heat to these rumored times is the possibility that the GT-R spied this week isn't even the top-end model. The three-tiered GT-R model range includes a base-model sporting 480hp and selling for US$57,000, a V-Spec going for US$67,000, and a range-topping 100kg lighter EVO-Spec with 530hp priced at US$94,000. Although pre-orders began in Japan on Thursday, the official unveiling will happen in Tokyo next month, with delivery slated for December.
Regardless of which model is lapping the 'ring in the 7:30s, it's a price-to-performance dream. The 911 GT2 rings up at US$191,700, while the Superleggera will lighten your wallet by US$220,300, if you can find one next year - all the 2007s are sold. Even the Ferrari F430, which runs the Green Hell in a relatively snail-paced 7:55, will run you a minimum of US$173,079. Half the price and all the performance? The supercar stalwarts should be scared.
Have an opinion?
Gus Posted: 9/22/2007 6:06pm PDT
However.
However.
However...
When a F430 drives by, people break their necks to stare. The sound is distinctive without being annoying from far away. With a Lamborghini, it feels like you're walking around with a supermodel (I know, I've driven one).
That will just never, ever, ever happen with an underdog (except maybe the Ariel Atom, which is in a league of it's own).
And so the supercars need never be scared, they just need to be close...
HECTOR Posted: 9/23/2007 6:36pm PDT
Much as I like it the Skyline is not a threat to a 911 turbo even if the Porsche gets beaten around the 'ring...
biturbo Posted: 9/24/2007 9:39am PDT
Total BS. All of them. 997 Turbo never did 7:40, please show me a proof for that.
As the GTR never did 7:38. These are just media (Edmunds) trying to make some stir and bring some revenues.
Wait for a true independent test.
Benni Posted: 10/11/2007 2:15am PDT
P Money Posted: 5/2/2008 9:23pm PDT
"Presence" and "Charisma" only reflect peoples perceptions of a car - i.e. the result of marketing. The only thing that will define who does it the best is testing and comparing measurable results, not popularity.
P Money Posted: 5/2/2008 9:24pm PDT
So on reflection, and in the light of the GT-R's new 7:29 lap time of the nurburgring, how do you see things now compared to back in september 2007?
P Money Posted: 5/2/2008 9:25pm PDT
You could call it cheap, but then maybe European exotics are just way overpriced? that's also likely.
Ice Posted: 5/7/2008 9:37am PDT
danny the mad engineer Posted: 6/20/2008 6:24am PDT
Genesis Posted: 7/21/2008 5:09am PDT
The GT-R trounces all the European supercars except for the lightest and most powerful (and overpriced). But what's funny is that SOME people are still living under the delusion that qualities such as "presence" and "charisma" (i.e. make-believe fantasies with no basis in the real world) will make up for any deficiencies in measurable performance that European sports cars lack lol > nice try guys, but that's gotta be the lamest, most desperate excuse I've ever heard to explain why higher priced sports cars from Europe do not perform to the level of the GT-R in terms of performances/price/and practicality. The only cars that are capable of beating the GT-R are either more powerful, lighter, or have better power-to-weight ratios. OWNED
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!