The European Parliament has asked formula one to "change their rules" in favour of more environmentally friendly technology. While the FIA has already paved the way for things like electronic energy recovery systems, smaller engines and bio-fuels, a statement on behalf of EU politicians said motor sport can play a bigger role in "changing attitudes and customer behaviour towards environmentally friendly technology".
The statement was part of a European Parliament report (CARS 21) that was adopted with 607 votes in favour, 76 against and 14 abstentions.
"The House therefore asks the FIA and others involved in formula one to change their rules accordingly, so that environmentally friendly technologies like bio-fuels, four-cylinder engines or
hybrid can be more easily applied," it read.
Update: It looks like the FIA is happy with the EU's proposal.
FIA happy with EU call for greener F1
F1's governing body has welcomed the findings of a European Parliament report, despite the interpretation that 'CARS 21' is in fact critical of the sport's environmentally-unfriendly policies.
A statement issued by the European Parliament called on F1 to "change their rules" in favour of greener technology, because motor sport can play a bigger role in "changing attitudes and customer behaviour towards environmentally friendly technology".
The Parliament asked the FIA and teams to contemplate things such as bio-fuels, four-cylinder engines and hybrid technology.
A statement issued by the FIA on Wednesday, however, said the report "recognises the leading role played by the" Paris body "in encouraging the development and use of new environmental technologies".
FIA president Max Mosley said: "It is immensely satisfying that the European Parliament recognises motor sport's role in developing environmentally-friendly technologies and supports the work undertaken by the FIA in its campaign to make motoring more sustainable in the future.
"With the support of the motor manufacturers competing in formula one and with the engineering expertise unique to the sport, the new technical regulations will accelerate the introduction of energy-efficient technologies into the domestic car market," he added. (GMM)
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!
By HECTOR Posted: 1/16/2008 6:38am PST
By bambam Posted: 1/16/2008 7:34am PST
greener then they should and yes I do agree that 4's are too little but the EU was just asking for FIA to keep it open for future development.
By Raptor Posted: 1/16/2008 7:55am PST
Some really don't understand what motorsport is really about.
By chris Posted: 1/16/2008 8:36am PST
If you're afraid of making the sport any less manly, lets look to WRC for just one moment. they run 2.0L engines making 350 hp. If we look back to the Group B days (group B cars had a production requirement of 200, instead of 25,000, and had "fewer" technological restrictions), we remember cars like the ford RS200. 450 bhp at 23 pounds boost, from a 1.8L "4 banger". that was almost 30 years ago.
I'm more than confident that in the last 30 years, we've gained the technology to boost that 450 bhp to the 800 hp F1 levels. sure, they'll have to run turbos, but given the latest headlines that you've read on this site; wouldn't you agree that the future of automotive power will come from increasing boost and technology in ever smaller engines?
there are tuners getting 900 hp out of STi's and EVO's. why wouldn't Ferrari or Toyota be able to do the same with their 400 million dollar budgets? Personally i think you're selling the series short by insisting that for the next 10 years, everyone has to use the same 3L v10 engine. if F1 teams dont have to WORK ON ENGINE DESIGN FOR THE NEXT 10 YEARS... what the hell are they going to do? there's over a billion dollars invested into F1 every year, and they're spending that money to develop engines that no one will ever use.
put the development money to good use; make them use a 4 banger. how reliable will our production 4cyls be when that day comes?
heres another idea; you can put in a hybrid system in the car and we wont even change the weight restrictions. if you wanna make a lighter car and shove a heavy electric motor in there, then that just gives you a better advantage. same weight of car, more power, more efficient.
green tech sucks because the only R&D that the auto companies have is US.
if anything, forcing 800 bhp from a 2L 4 cyl engine will be nothing shy of entertaining with all the break downs. and then maybe more people would watch.
By jim Posted: 1/16/2008 8:36am PST
By NaBUru38 Posted: 1/16/2008 11:16am PST
Today I drove a 70hp non-turbo Peugeot 206 1.9 XND. It does 0-100 km/h in 17 secs. Was it incredibly slow? Not for me.
By Ryanza Posted: 1/16/2008 2:35pm PST
By Alan Posted: 1/17/2008 8:56am PST
Another thing is, i'm not 100% sure, but from memory those turbo 4 cylinder F1 cars were quite thirsty to run
By ed Posted: 1/17/2008 9:43am PST
By v12 fan Posted: 1/9/2010 2:03pm PST
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!