Bridgestone Announces Custom Colored Tires

Preview: 2011 Audi R4

 
30 37,872 views February 6, 2008

audi r4 preview01

Preview: 2011 Audi R4

Preview: 2011 Audi R4

Enlarge Photo
Many believed talk of Audi’s future mid-engined Cayman rival was pure fantasy but then details about the carmaker’s future lineup were published by Quattro Quarterly (a publication released by the Audi Club of North America) and one of the cars on that list was in fact the long rumored R4. Set to appear in June 2011, the new R4 will get its own unique platform and will likely appear in both coupe and roadster bodystyles.

Like the R8, the new R4 will feature aggressive styling and will only be able to seat two. Several engine options will be on offer as this won’t be an exclusive supercar like its bigger brother. Expect to see a range-topping model with a high-output turbocharged mill developing in excess of 300hp. Base models, meanwhile, will make do with an uprated version of the 2.0L TFSI engine.

As this rendering suggests, the R4 will pick up some styling cues from the recent A1 Metroproject concept car as well as share many similarities with the bigger R8. Although it doesn’t have the familiar side-blades, the R4 still features a pair of gaping vents positioned in front of the rear wheels. The chassis will feature steel construction but engineers are targeting a final kerb weight of around 1,250kg, and although the mid-engined Boxster and Cayman seem like the most obvious competitors Audi officials insist the new car is designed to rival vehicles from BMW’s M division and AMG.
2011 Audi R4

HI-RES GALLERY: audi r4 preview01




Posted in:
 
Contribute
Send us a tip Comment Contact the editor
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
Comments (30)

  1. By chris Posted: 2/6/2008 8:29am PST

    so..... its a rear-mid engined TT?

    so long as it is more badass looking than the TT... and mid engined,... then I'm sure people would be willing to spend 40 or 50k on this baby.

    ...now if only ford would make an AWD rear-mid engined car, maybe with a turbo 2L or something... call it like... RS200... or something... like that..... i'd buy it. oh dont make it a chick car like the miata.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. By CK Posted: 2/6/2008 8:39am PST

    Looks a bit like a mid engined Audi variant of the Scirocco^^
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. By elclair Posted: 2/6/2008 8:45am PST

    Why is Audi always building cars to compete with another manufacturer. (Instead of the other way around) Audi seems to not be able to set the standard....they can only aim for it.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. By CK Posted: 2/6/2008 9:10am PST

    But what should they sell or invent new? An Audi pickup, a coupé saloon cabrio with a folding metal roof? In my opinion there are more than enough useless cars out there. Best example in my opinion are all these SUV, SAV and what the hell they are called vehicles.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. By chris Posted: 2/6/2008 9:38am PST

    ck, its a PAS... Piece o.. no wait.. progressive activity sedan.

    yeah I agree, audi shouldn't be following, but you must admit, at least they arent trying to find new corners of an already cornered market. no... wait.. they have the cross quattro concept, thats a 5 passenger coupe/cabrio/offroader.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. By elclair Posted: 2/6/2008 9:40am PST

    WhatI actually meant was.. No one is building a car to compete with an Audi... What makes manufacutrer great is that it is able to step outside the box and not follow everyone else around like a lost puppy. I hear too many times that Audi is building ...whatever car to compete with whoever....That's why I don't really take Audi seriously in the world of Sportcars, they follow, they don't lead...(And yes, I mentioned world of sportscars because it's the market they are trying so hard to prove themselves in)
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. By Bob Posted: 2/6/2008 9:53am PST

    I disagree with some of these comments. I dont think Audi always follows. Could you imagine BMW or Mercedes launching a midengined sports car, or pursueing diesels. Merc joined McLaren for its supercar and the bloody thing has a front mounted supercharged V8 engine and auto gearbox - yeh right that's cutting edge. Audi was also using turbos for a lot of its models well before BMW started using them.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  8. By mlevere1992 Posted: 2/6/2008 10:35am PST

    Bob, about 60 to 70% of the cars the BMW sells in Europe are diesels and the TT diesel that is in the 330d has won awards. I wish these companies would bring their diesels over to the US. We just need to be more educated about these cars and maybe we would latch onto them like the hybreds that everyone wants.

    Enough of that, if Audi would make this a 2+2 then I would buy it in a hearbeat. I love the styling of this car better than the R8. It just looks mean. I love it in red but change it to black and it would be bad ass.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  9. By chris Posted: 2/6/2008 10:42am PST

    guys,.. about the audi/merc/bmw comments.. i look at it like mazda/toyota/honda.... i mean... audi doesnt carry the same prestige as the other two but people who really know theyre cars know that audi is a sound investment.. its more or less which car you like the most. mazda has always been the runt of the japanese makers (nissan too.. yes)... but if you ask me mazda is a better buy than toyota or honda. you're getting honda quality and engineering for toyota costs. i mean, i've said it before but if my blood didnt flow blue then i'd buy mazda in a heart beat. same thing with audi. i'd love to buy a bmw... and i hate merc.. but even though i like bmw's image and styling... if i were the buy a german car, it would be an audi. hands down.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  10. By Gus Posted: 2/6/2008 11:00am PST

    It does sort of look like the Scirocco.
    I like Audi, I like BMW, I like Mercedes.
    I like saving money even more... :)
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  11. By James Posted: 2/6/2008 12:25pm PST

    Nice rendering... Audi should consider this for a final design. :)
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  12. By Raptor Posted: 2/6/2008 12:44pm PST

    It would be great with RWD
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  13. By CK Posted: 2/6/2008 12:59pm PST

    Well guys if you look on everything the other way round you will see that there are actually things Audi does that nobody else did before. For example using all wheel drive in all models of the their range, introducing one of the first performance sedans with the Porsche build RS2, being one of the leader in diesel development, building the first diesel car that has won the 24 hours of le mans and buying a traditional italien supercar manufacturer. Also today the design of Audi cars is regarded like the bauhaus style of the automobile branch compared to other manufacturers.

    And I must say BMW used turbos before Audi in their road cars. The BMW 2002 turbo was the first mass production car with a turbocharged engine at the beginning of the 70s.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  14. By Roy Posted: 2/6/2008 3:34pm PST

    Audi was also the first manufacturer to use zinc to galvanize their cars against rust... However, I think what is being highlighted here is that Audi has had a tendency to rest on its laurels for long periods of time. After the Quattro, they stagnated for a decade. After the A4, they stagnated some more. Now they appear to be picking up again. Maybe Audi will be the car to beat in the future again, but for now they are doing a pretty reasonable job of playing catch-up, again.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  15. By CK Posted: 2/6/2008 5:00pm PST

    I forgot that one Roy. Got to used to rusting Merc E classes :D
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  16. By Sir Yappie Posted: 2/6/2008 5:25pm PST

    i like it...and i would honestly want one....but this car will kill the TT....unless it is as a TT replacement. Audi might be trying to get a class system for their cars so it makes sense to release the next incantation of the TT as the R4.
    A = Sedans
    R = Sports Cars
    S = Sports sedans
    RS = Super Sports sedans
    Q = 4x4 / SUV's
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  17. By mlevere1992 Posted: 2/7/2008 1:12pm PST

    This won't kill the TT. This is going to be probably placed above the TT with a $8,000 to $10,000 price gap. It will have a bigger engine and different driving dynamincs.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  18. By Sir Yappie Posted: 2/7/2008 4:40pm PST

    This model to come in above the TT. Are you implying a Boxster to Caymen type scenario ??
    If you ask any purist which car of those they would choose they would always go for the Boxster, but the Caymen is the better looking model without a doubt.

    I still think all the R4 will do is create a competetitor for a car it already has, the TT. There is no need to create such a car as the S5 is already enough to compete with the M3 and AMG stable of coupes And the next incantationsof said coupe willl be styled better than the current understated car.

    A needless excercise imho.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  19. By lexlife Posted: 2/8/2008 11:41am PST

    I agree with Yappie. This is a needless vehicle that will steal sales away from the TT-RS edition. Audi does not need an additional vehicle to compete against the Cayman as its ALL the SAME company. Their may be a niche market for the RS3 here however.
    Audi need to make affordable sports cars near A3's price range that offer an advantage in performance and luxury versus VW models with a choice of diesel and awd/fwd/dsg/manual configuarations.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  20. By steel5150 Posted: 2/13/2008 2:15am PST

    People say what you want about Audi, BMW and Mercedes. The bottom line is that these automakers contine to make some of the finest cars in the world and as for Audi which is my fav and looks nothing like the other two each is different from the other but of the three there is no one, outside of uber expensive luxury cars that makes a better interior than Audi and if you get a chance to drive any of the three auto makers cars and still feel the same way then you've undoubtedly miss the whole point of driving. (In America we commute in Europe they drive.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  21. By vagabond Posted: 2/13/2008 5:17pm PST

    I think it looks very boring.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  22. By Sir Yappie Posted: 2/14/2008 5:13pm PST

    its a rendering from Motor Authority and not an official pic from Audi.

    Still think the model will be the death nell of the TT
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  23. By Car Fan Posted: 2/17/2008 12:48pm PST

    The reason why some think that Audi builds models to compete against others has nothing to do with Audi, it has all to do with the dumb journalists who have to sensationalize every bit of news to get people's attention. "Oh, Audi is building a BMW M3 beater...", or "Audi to build an SLK competitor".

    Personally, I rationalize and make up my own mind as to what Audi is building and do not need any dumb journalist to make my mind up for me, and even more so do not depend on mass acceptance to make my own judgements. Frankly, I think that is weak-minded or as others prefer calling it "mob mentality".

    The Sporty 7-seater Q7 was introduced without competitors, so was the Audi A3, the only competitor for the R8 is the 911 Carrera 4S, I do not see any competitor for the future R4 either, the older allroad was above (in performance) than the V70R. The remaining models have to compete in the main categories since they are all the main money makers for any brand.

    Finally, its not who enters a segment first, its who is the most succesfull at it (pleasing customers) while increasing sales (pleasing stockholders).
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  24. By  John Cookson Posted: 9/24/2009 5:17pm PDT

    Got my first Audi 4 years ago. An A3. It was great and the DSG transmission (Which Audi invented) was the key ingredient that put me over the edge. I always want MT, however the DSG is a "mind reading miracle" better than any MT I have ever used - kudos to Audi on that one. I was unimpressed with many electronic faults on the A3 (particularly coming from decades of reliable Nissan and Toyota ownership). I replaced the Audi A3 a couple of months ago and would have purchased the FWD Audi TT 2.0T (with DSG of course) except no dealers in Canada had one that I could buy and the FWD models were being dropped for 2010. Ditto for the BMW 335ix coupe with MT as I couldn't get a test drive anywhere. I ended up buying an Infiniti G37x coupe as it was easy to get test drives and there were plenty of 2009 cars to buy. Have to admit though that I would have been happier with a TT. There is nothing wrong with the G37, it is just more boring and comes with a "non-mind reading" 7 speed automatic transmission.
    The 2011 R4 looks very interesting and availability of DSG on this model is a plus compared to the TT-RS which offers no DSG. However the cramped rear seats on the TT can be useful and it is disappointing the RS4 has only 2 seats. Audi make beautiful looking cars although I do not like the way they are going with their new dashboard styling (like on the new A4) The new dashboard styling puts me off the cars altogether and makes them look like every other boring car out there.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  25. By John Posted: 1/15/2010 11:28am PST

    One of the ugliest car from years.
    Alfa 8c competizione and Cadillac Convejr are much much better than this . It looks like audi TT , they change only rear lights taken from audi A1.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  26. By TBrown Posted: 2/12/2010 9:30am PST

    I just went to a car show last night and for the money audi was much better in design than mercedes and bmw. You can't buy a nice mercedes or bmw for any less than 70k ( other than the c class and 3 series ). And to be completely honest the best looking and best performance cars there were Cadillac with its CTS-v that has 556 horsepower.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  27. By Audi/Merc Posted: 4/7/2010 10:23am PDT

    I own an sl55 and R8, my business partner owns a Gallardo Spyder (2008) I have spent many thousands of miles in each car. The SL 55 is by far the best over all car. The Gal is best for shock value and speed, but a bit uncomfortable. The R8 handles better than the Gallardo,the Quattro drive train is superior to the Lambo set up, even though they are about the same. The R8 has a wonderful over all interior. One flaw on Audi's execution are its seats. Not just in the R8, but across all models, they have a fixed headrest. If u sit in these seats and contour to them, your chin ends up almost on your chest. I drive my R8 almost daily, and love the car. But after about 2 hours behind the wheel, my neck starts bothering me. BMW and Mercedes have much better seats, and it is a big deal in a car. The transmission (I have paddle shift) is OK but a bit dated with no double clutch and only 6 speeds, in a car like that I would expect a 7 speed now. Oddly, the Lambo E gear shifts better.Audi also makes very flat seat surfaces, and they do not vent air well. In an R8 most will not care, but in a car you drive every day, you do. The is the main draw back to the whole Audi line I can find.
    My R8 loves to be in the shop for mostly electrical issues. The Lambo has been shopped 1 time in 8500 miles. My R8 went in the shop about 6 times in that period. I am surprised to see that much difference between the cars. I would seriously consider an R4.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  28. By  John in Mesa Posted: 5/18/2010 9:55pm PDT

    I like this concept, but honestly, I don't think they need a whole new model. I wish they would take this front end, and the stretched out rear of the R8 and just apply it to the TT.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  29. By Gabe Posted: 10/15/2010 2:33am PDT

    The Europe Ford Division has a model called the Ford Focus 2.5 ST. Comes with stock 225hp turbo, 6-speed manual. 0-60mph in 6-seconds flat. They dont have this car in the states.
    The Audi R4 is awesome, can't wait till see it actually release it. I'll buy it if its around 50,000.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  30. By Gabe Posted: 10/15/2010 2:40am PDT

    @Audi/Merc Yes, I agree with you. For people who don't really own a sports car, here is the thing. If you drive more than 2 hours in a sports car, your neck or back starts to ache or fatigue. The seats are designed for performance purpose, and may not tend to be in the comfort zone. I recalled one time that it was so bad that I just want do abandon the car and take a cab home. Thats how bad it is.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Research New Cars

Go!


More from High Gear Media

 
 
MotorAuthority
  • Follow Us
  • Twiiter
  • Facebook
 
 
© 2011 MotorAuthority. All Rights Reserved. MotorAuthority is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.
 

Use the form below to send us a tip, give us feedback, or just say hello.

(max 750 characters)