By
Nelson Ireson
Nelson Ireson
Editor
BIO
Nelson is an Editor at High Gear Media focusing on reviewing cars and covering the hottest topics in luxury and performance cars, car culture, and...
More
LATEST ARTICLE
2012 BMW M6 Preview
With the new 6-Series Gran Coupe, the revised 6-Series Coupe and Convertible, and now the 2012 M6...
Read More
- #3LEADERBOARD RANK
- 5124ARTICLES CONTRIBUTED
- 187COMMENTS POSTED
As Jaguar faces its impending sale to India's Tata Motors, things at the Coventry-based maker are continuing as usual - or even at a slightly quicker pace. Featuring updates to a model lineup that had stagnated under
Ford's tenure, the new direction taken by the leaping cat looks to head straight into the future.
Perhaps the most interesting model expected from Jaguar in the next few years is the F-Type (concept pictured) - a $50,000 two-seat sports car based on the XF sedan and considered the spiritual successor to the legendary E-Type. Production feasibility work has already been done on the car, and suposedly production is within the realm of serious possibility - although neither of the new cars has anything like a certain future. However, given the sale of Jaguar alongside
Land Rover and Tata Motor's ability to infuse capital - and likely desire to put their mark on the newly-acquired companies - production of these cars could be just what is needed.
The second car being considered for production is a supersedan based on the XK, envisioned as a competitor for
Aston Martin's Rapide, the Mercedes-Benz CLS and
Porsche's upcoming Panamera. While sales of such an upscale sports sedan might not drive volume, it could certainly be the sort of product that draws buyers into the brand. Conflict with the existing XJ flagship sedan is not likely because the new XJ, coming in 2009, will be larger and all-new, moving it into another class, according to
AutoWeek.
Rumors of an AMG-esque XKR-R featuring 500hp and priced above $100,000 are also making the rounds. Likewise, the XF Coupe and
Convertible are being considered, but the topless version wouldn't be as easy to bring to fruition, as extra chassis stiffening - meaning added weight, and worsened performance - would be necessary.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!