Advertisement

Combination 2/4-stroke engine prototype tested

 
8 2,112 views Mar 25, 2008
Follow Nelson

ricardo 2 4sight 1

Related Photo Galleries


See more photos »

Combination 2/4-stroke engine prototype tested

Combination 2/4-stroke engine prototype tested

Enlarge Photo
Smaller, more powerful motors are the future of the auto industry. GM and Chrysler are focusing on smaller four- and six-cylinder motors for their Camaro and Challenger, while others are pushing the envelopes of forced-induction sub-2.0L powerplants. A new technology has appeared on the horizon, however, and it may steal all the glory if it proves cost-effective. Ricardo announced today it has completed initial testing of a dual two- and four-stroke engine which it claims can cut displacement in half without harming power output.

With an impressive specific output of 150Nm/L at 1,000rpm and 230Nm/L at 2,500rpm, Ricardo thinks the technology, called 2/4SIGHT, will allow a 2.1L V6 engine to keep pace with a naturally aspirated 3-4L V6 or V8 engine. Considering the 2.1L V6 would put out 460Nm torque at just 2,500rpm and have 300Nm torque available just off idle, the claim isn't just a pipe dream - if they can bring the technology to fruition.

Tests were run on a single bank of a 2.1L V6 motor, and computer simulations calibrated to reflect the load of a typical 1,800kg powered by a naturally aspirated 3.5L V6 driven through a five-speed automatic transmission. The tests showed a 2.0L 2/4SIGHT V6 could provide identical performance with a 27% fuel savings, reducing CO2 output from 260g/km to 190g/km.


The technology uses direct injection and forced induction combined with variable intake and exhaust valve timing, variable fuel injection timing and variable boost - all at an individual cylinder level, meaning each can be tuned for optimal performance instantaneously. Because the technology is so advanced, it will require a long development period before it can come to market, but Ricardo is currently seeking partners to bring the engine to life.

Ricardo 2/4SIGHT Engine

HI-RES GALLERY: ricardo 2 4sight 1




Tags:
Posted in:
 
 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (8)

  1. Knight3058 Posted: 3/25/2008 3:41pm PDT

    Sounds promising.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. the gamper Posted: 3/25/2008 3:51pm PDT

    A 2.0 Liter 4 Cyl with Direct injection and turbo can already provide similar performance to a NA 3.5 V6. I believe with a fuel saving advantage as well, though maybe not 27%. I dont know about the emissions though. Anyway, it does sound promising and I am sure this is just the tip of the iceberg. Very intersting to see all the mpg automakers are able to squeeze out of a gallon of gasoline.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. Gus Posted: 3/25/2008 5:11pm PDT

    It does sound promising.
    I've said it all along, though, the question of reliability comes up when you are squeezing THAT hard and using SO much technology.
    I'm sure someday it will all be as reliable as ABS and airbags, which were once considered complex.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. shortroot Posted: 3/25/2008 5:20pm PDT

    @Knight3058: Sounds expensive (exorbitant)

    Seriously though, it does look just a tad on the complicated side. I wouldn't like my chances of attemting to fix one that went wrong, and I am sure there is lots to go wrong.

    It is good to be entering a time when people are attempting o push the boundaries of what is possible, but in a different direction. As I have said in the other thread, anything that helps save waste and maintains performance at the same time is alright in my book.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. Ivan Posted: 3/25/2008 6:45pm PDT

    I am sure if you would apply forced induction/injection for individual cylinder
    on regular 4 stroke engine, it will be very efficient (yet complicated). That's where
    engines are moving now anyway, not sure how 2-stroke helps here, more torque
    at lower RPMs?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. aivi Posted: 3/27/2008 9:48am PDT

    Patent of Ukraine № 41715A, 06.05.2001, author and patentee Andrey Ilchouk, at Ricardo plagiarism!!!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. peste Posted: 3/27/2008 1:19pm PDT

    This system is going to require a control system which will be an incredible pain in the ass to design and implement for durable operation
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  8. aivi Posted: 3/28/2008 4:45am PDT

    It is simple. But Ricardo does his difficult method. I know how to do it is better.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Contribute
Send us a tip Comment Contact the editor
Follow Us

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Research New Cars

Go!


More from High Gear Media

 
 
MotorAuthority
  • Follow Us
  • Twiiter
  • Facebook
 
 
© 2013 MotorAuthority. All Rights Reserved. MotorAuthority is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.