
corvette study 01
GM Chairman wants to see models on sale ahead...
Lutz confirms Chevrolet Orlando may get Volt...
2010 SEMA Preview: 2011 Corvette Z06X Track...
Video: Chevrolet Talks About The Camaro SSX...
Chevrolet MiRay Concept: 2011 Seoul Motor Show
Corvettes of the past have taken inspiration from water animals like sharks and stingrays but Luccion’s design is based around a land animal. Some unique elements borrowed from nature is the curvature of a Cheetah’s back, which can be seen in the profile of the car, as well as the animal's fangs, translated into the concept’s front bumper.
Ivan Luccion is a U.S.-based designer and recently graduated from Brigham Young University after completing a degree in Industrial Design.
Via: AutoMotto
Have an opinion?
Raptor Posted: 4/13/2008 10:51am PDT
lexlife Posted: 4/13/2008 10:56am PDT
javier Posted: 4/13/2008 11:40am PDT
94 Taurus owner Posted: 4/13/2008 12:00pm PDT
ohmy Posted: 4/13/2008 2:27pm PDT
MyWheelsOnWalls.com Posted: 4/13/2008 3:50pm PDT
Question, why do we associate rear engine with higher cost/luxury item? I find it hard to believe just by putting the engine in the back manufacturing costs go up. Besides is'nt the 599 more money than any of its rivals, hmmmm!
Layne Posted: 4/13/2008 4:02pm PDT
Wizards Lore Posted: 4/13/2008 6:10pm PDT
MyWheelsOnWalls Posted: 4/13/2008 7:12pm PDT
Do you remember the dinosaurs?
Chris Posted: 4/13/2008 9:11pm PDT
MyWheelsOnWalls.com Posted: 4/13/2008 10:13pm PDT
One can only hope for sooner than two or three generations down the road.
Please GOD have the designers at Cadillac call Chevrolet and teach them how the flaps on the box works so they can look out side to.
Wizards Lore Posted: 4/13/2008 11:16pm PDT
MyWheelsOnWalls Posted: 4/13/2008 11:35pm PDT
It just time to move on or follow Jaguars previous path. Also dont get me started on Mustangs, solid beam rear suspension! I mean come on an independent rear suspension will never take off, who would pay for the benefits of that.
Wizards Lore Posted: 4/14/2008 7:19am PDT
And the Mustangs rear suspension is the same as the one used on the Falcon here in Australia.....still about 25 years behind the norm....
chris Posted: 4/14/2008 7:46am PDT
this isnt a corvette. if you look at the current generation corvette, they could put the engine in the back by moving the passenger cabin up a foot at the most.
something radical like this isnt a corvette. I'm sorry. you'll lose everyone that the corvette appeals to, not because of the mid engine but because the design is not american at all. at least not chevy anyways.
this basically looks like some one took the shelby concept we just saw a couple weeks ago and put a corvette badge on it.
a mid engine car doesnt have to look italian.........................
Gus Posted: 4/14/2008 9:56am PDT
But, there are a lot of people who balk at anything other than a RWD, front engined V8. Kind of like the Porsche guys and their rear mounted six...
chris Posted: 4/14/2008 10:45am PDT
But in the end I really do see the vette getting ever smaller and smaller V8's with turbo's.... which would be nice. I've already said it but I'll say it again. There's no need for this continual "dropping of cylinders"... lets just drop the displacements.. and keep things as they are. I4's for small cars, V6's for mids, and V8's for your large cars, trucks, SUVs, and muscle cars.
If the 2020 Vette needs to get 30 mpg to keep CAFE happy, then why cant it have a 3L V8 with twin turbos? should be able to get a solid 450 hp out of that sucker, with VVT, VIT, forced induction... etc..
Gus Posted: 4/14/2008 5:05pm PDT
You can always hear the Lambos and Ferraris (we have 3 in our apartment complex) when they accelrate up the local main road, sounds like Senna, back from the dead. Good sound...
Wizards Lore Posted: 4/15/2008 3:01am PDT
Layne Posted: 4/15/2008 4:25am PDT
And besides, what exactly is wrong with the formula the Corvette is currently using? Just because it goes about it's business differently than other sports cars means it has to change to conform to what elitists think it "should" be? Why? Does every car have to follow the same design philosophy? Get off you high horses, and stop dogging the Corvette for being "last century". Don't buy one, and instead go buy your sports car of choice. It's as simple as that.
Oh and one more thing; I can see Corvettes being forced to go to smaller engines for economy reasons, but currently, there is absolutely nothing wrong with the LS series engines that have been used in Corvettes for years. They're light as hell, very compact, cheap to produce, reliable, make gobs of power with simple mods, get extremely good mileage, sound fantastic, and as a bonus they even look good aesthetically speaking. So remind me again what's wrong with pushrods? Oh ya, they're "old". So it may be one of the best engine designs in production, but it contains elements that aren't attractive to techno geeks, therefore it must be crap. *Sigh* If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
And just so you know, I'm not a Corvette fanboy. They're great cars, but not entirely to my taste. Personally I actually prefer Japanese tuners and European sports cars. I just can't stand all this senseless, ignorant hate that seems to float around Corvettes.
/Rant.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!